ID |
Date |
Author |
Type |
Category |
Subject |
8418
|
Fri Apr 5 01:28:56 2013 |
Manasa | Update | 40m Upgrading | Endtable upgrade for auxiliary green laser : populating the table |
I started populating the end table; the TRY path to start with. I found that I need to redo the cables/electronics layout around the table as we have only one cable feedthrough hole with the new box right now. I need another hand with this and will have Annalisa help me tomorrow.
P.S. I misaligned PRM and restored ETMY to get TRY flashes. I tweaked ETMY to see strong TEM00 flashes.
Old slider positions on medm screen in case we need to restore them:
TT1 TT2 ITMY ETMY
P -1.3586 0.8443 0.9114 -3.7693
Y 0.3049 1.1507 -0.2823 -0.2761
|
8419
|
Sat Apr 6 09:21:36 2013 |
rana | Update | 40m Upgrading | Not a fan of the new plastic box yet |
1) We still need to drill and install the thumbscrew latches which secure the lids to the table. We cannot use the tables as an acoustic enclosure with loose lids.
2) For the camera issue, the idea is to put the longpass filters on the front of the cameras: then they are only sensitive to light with wavelength > 800 nm.
3) Whenever any interferometer work is happening the light switches must be in the positions which have been marked on them (and which most everyone ignores foolishly). We have never been insensitive to the room lights; the black table enclosures just give us a false sense of security. Room lights impact the interferometer noise. |
8420
|
Sun Apr 7 20:49:19 2013 |
Zach | Update | General | Restarted elog |
with the script, as it was down. |
8421
|
Mon Apr 8 08:05:41 2013 |
Steve | Update | PSL | PMC locked |
The PMC locked manually. MC grabbed lock instantaniously |
8422
|
Mon Apr 8 10:19:46 2013 |
Jenne | Update | PSL | LSC left enabled |
Note: The TRY PD isn't installed and normalized properly yet, so the IFO OVERVIEW screen indicates lock for the Yarm constantly, which is not true. Hopefully in the next day or so the screen will be back to telling the truth.
Also, the LSC Locking was left ENABLED (presumably over the weekend). This is not so good. It can kick optics around, so we should all take a look when we walk through the control room, and if no one is locking, please disable the LSC master switch. |
8423
|
Mon Apr 8 16:37:26 2013 |
Steve | Update | 40m Upgrading | ETMY enclosure wall transmission |
Enclosure cover #1 transmission measured in 1064 nm, 156 mW, P polarization and beam size ~ 1 mm
As condition: fully assembled, protective layer removed, tinted- adhesive activated on yellow acrylic on top of each other.
T = 1.2 % in 20 minutes exposure test. This agrees with the test measurement of 6-18-2012
There is a reflected 2-3 cm circular glare that is barely visible on sensor card. It is well below 1 mW level
As we are installing the NPRO with ~350 mW of power we have to address what additional shield should be installed.
The June 2012 test with 1W power burned through of the 3 layer IR coated films in 3-4 hours.
We 'll use Aluminum shields in the high power path till we come up with better solution. |
8424
|
Mon Apr 8 22:43:44 2013 |
rana | Update | PSL | MC locking troubles: MC/FSS servo unstable |
The MC seemed to be losing lock recently quite a bit. I noticed that the PC Drive RMS signal was red.
This means that the high frequency drive to the Pockels cell was too high by a factor of 2-3 and sometimes saturating and breaking the lock.
I fiddled with the gains on the FSS screen until this value went down. It looks like there is some kind of high Q oscillation; it takes a couple minutes for the PC Drive RMS to settle to its new position after changing the gains.
The attached trend plot show the last 2 hours. The mean is now back to ~1 V and seems OK. We should really examine the FSS or MC error point spectra with the RF analyzer while exploring this gain space. |
Attachment 1: Untitled.png
|
|
8425
|
Tue Apr 9 00:15:18 2013 |
Manasa | Update | 40m Upgrading | Endtable upgrade for auxiliary green laser : populating the table |
[Den, Annalisa, Manasa]
The Alberto laser was moved from the PSL table. The height of the heat sink rendered a beam height of only 3 inches. I did not want to deal with changing beam height at the table. So, we went ahead and used the old heat sink. I used the beam scan to make measurements of the beam width to match my mode-matching calculations and found some mismatch with the measurements done earlier. So I will measure the beam width again before alignment.
I will also have to change the layout because of the supporting posts that have come up with the new box. Annalisa is doing a COMSOL model to check what the thickness of these supporting posts should be so that the box stays stiff. |
8427
|
Tue Apr 9 00:32:57 2013 |
Manasa | Update | 40m Upgrading | Endtable upgrade for auxiliary green laser : TRY temporarily in place |
The TRY path on the end table is temporarily in place to help IFO locking.
The Y arm transmission was steered to get TRY back on the PD and the camera. I found that TRY is a couple of inches off in yaw at the end table (comparing to the CAD layout and the earlier layout) and I believe it is because of the changes in input pointing.
I've used a Y1 mirror to steer the Y transmission to an R98% BS. The reflected beam falls on PDA520 and the transmitted beam is steered to the camera. The earlier normalization of TRY is no more valid as the power distribution at the PD has changed. |
8428
|
Tue Apr 9 01:46:40 2013 |
Zach | Update | General | Restarted elog |
Again.
Quote: |
with the script, as it was down.
|
|
8429
|
Tue Apr 9 07:48:10 2013 |
Steve | Update | PSL | PMC locked |
Quote: |
The PMC locked manually. MC grabbed lock instantaniously
|
PMC locked |
Attachment 1: pmc10d.png
|
|
8430
|
Tue Apr 9 08:37:54 2013 |
Steve | Update | 40m Upgrading | Endtable upgrade for auxiliary green laser : TRY temporarily in place |
Quote: |
The TRY path on the end table is temporarily in place to help IFO locking.
The Y arm transmission was steered to get TRY back on the PD and the camera. I found that TRY is a couple of inches off in yaw at the end table (comparing to the CAD layout and the earlier layout) and I believe it is because of the changes in input pointing.
I've used a Y1 mirror to steer the Y transmission to an R98% BS. The reflected beam falls on PDA520 and the transmitted beam is steered to the camera. The earlier normalization of TRY is no more valid as the power distribution at the PD has changed.
|
Temporary acrylic wind guard added between enclosure and ETMY transmission window to help IFO locking |
8431
|
Tue Apr 9 14:55:13 2013 |
Jamie | Update | CDS | overbooked test points cause of DAQ problems |
Folks were complaining that they were getting zeros whenever they tried to open fast channels in DTT or Dataviewer. It turned out that the problem was that all available test points were in use in the c1lsc model:

There is a limit to how many test points can be open to a single model (in point of fact I think the limit is on the data rate from the model to the frame builder, not the actual number of open test points). In any event, they was all used up. The grid at the bottom right of the C1LSC GDS screen was all full of non-zeros, and the FE TRATE number was red, indicating that the data rate from this model had surpassed threshold.
The result of this overbooking is that any new test points just get zeros. This is a pretty dumb failure mode (ideally one would not be able to request the TP at all with an appropriate error message), but it is what it is. This usually means that there are too many dtt/dataviewers left with open connections.
We tried killing all the open processes that we could find that might be holding open test points, but that didn't seem to clear them up. Stuck open test points is another known problem. Referencing the solution in #6968 I opened the diag shell and killed all test points everywhere:
controls@pianosa:~ 0$ diag -l -z
Set new test FFT
NDS version = 12
supported capabilities: testing testpoints awg
diag> tp clear * *
test point cleared
diag> quit
EXIT KERNEL
controls@pianosa:~ 0$
|
8432
|
Tue Apr 9 21:27:48 2013 |
Jenne | Update | 40m Upgrading | TRY temporarily in place |
Quote: |
I've used a Y1 mirror to steer the Y transmission to an R98% BS. The reflected beam falls on PDA520 and the transmitted beam is steered to the camera. The earlier normalization of TRY is no more valid as the power distribution at the PD has changed.
|
To take this into account, last night, I reduced the TRY gain by a factor of 2. This is not exactly correct - when the layout is finalized we need to figure out what the pickoff situation used to be (we think, based on the Xend, that it could have been 0.5*0.9), and do the correct normalization. |
8433
|
Wed Apr 10 01:10:22 2013 |
Jenne | Update | Locking | Configure screen and scripts updated |
I have gone through the different individual degrees of freedom on the IFO_CONFIGURE screen (I haven't done anything to the full IFO yet), and updated the burt snapshot request files to include all of the trigger thresholds (the DoF triggers were there, but the FM triggers and the FM mask - which filter modules to trigger - were not). I also made all of the restore scripts (which does the burt restore for all those settings) the same. They were widely different, rather than just different optics chosen for misaligning and restoring.
Before doing any of this work, I moved the whole folder ..../caltech/c1/burt/c1ifoconfigure to ..../caltech/c1/burt/c1ifoconfigure_OLD_but_SAVE , so we can go back and look at the past settings, if we need to.
I also changed the "C1save{DoF}" scripts to ask for keyboard input, and then added them as options to the CONFIGURE screen. The keyboard input is so that people randomly pushing the buttons don't overwrite our saved burt files. Here's the secret: It asks if you are REALLY sure you want to save the configuration. If you are, type the word "really", then hit enter (as in yes, I am really sure). Any other answer, and the script will tell you that it is quitting without saving.
I have also removed the "PRM" option, since we really only want the "PRMsb" for almost all purposes.
Also, I removed access to the very, very old text file about how to lock from the screen. That information is now on the wiki: https://wiki-40m.ligo.caltech.edu/How_To/Lock_the_Interferometer
I have noted in the drop-down menus that the "align" functions are not yet working. I know that Den has gotten at least one of the arms' ASSes working today, so once those scripts are ready, we can call them from the configure screen.
Anyhow, the IFO_CONFIGURE screen should be back to being useful! |
8435
|
Wed Apr 10 07:37:33 2013 |
Steve | Update | PSL | PMC locked |
Quote: |
Quote: |
The PMC locked manually. MC grabbed lock instantaniously
|
PMC locked
|
PMC locked. |
Attachment 1: pmc4d.png
|
|
8436
|
Wed Apr 10 14:25:04 2013 |
Manasa | Update | 40m Upgrading | Endtable upgrade for auxiliary green laser : LWE Alberto laser beam profile |
I measured the beam profile of the Alberto laser (that will be the ETMY end laser) as I found the data inconsistent with the measurements done earlier.
Method
The laser was set to nominal current (ADJ =0) and the output measured 330mW. I used a 99% BS and measured the beam profile of the transmitted light at several points along propagation using Beamscan. I am attaching the data and matlab script for the fit for future reference.

|
Attachment 2: beam_waist.zip
|
8438
|
Thu Apr 11 02:00:21 2013 |
Jenne | Update | Locking | TRY gone??? |
TRY signals are all gone! Both the PD and the camera show no signal. I went down there to turn off the lights, and look to see what was up, and I don't see any obvious things blocking the beam path on the table. However, Steve has experimentally bungeed the lids down, so I didn't open the box to really look to see what the story is.
Absent TRY, I redid the IFO alignment. Yarm locked, so I assumed it was close enough. I redid Xarm alignment pretty significantly. Transmission was ~0.5, which I got up to ~0.85 (which isn't too bad, since the PMC transmission is 0.74 instead of the usual 0.83). I then aligned MICH, and PRM. After fixing up the BS alignment, the POP beam wasn't hitting the POP PD in the center any more. I centered the beam on the PD, although as Gabriele pointed out to me a week or two ago, we really need to put a lens in front of POP, since the beam is so big. We're never getting the full beam when the cavity flashes, which is not so good.
Den is still working on locking, so I'll let him write the main locking report for the night.
We see that the PRC carrier lock seems to be more stable when we lock MICH with +1 for ITMY and -1 for ITMX, and PRCL with -1 for both ITMs. This indicates that we need to revisit the systematic problem with using the PRM oplev to balance the coils, since that oplev has a relatively wide opening angle. I am working on how to do this. |
8439
|
Thu Apr 11 02:49:18 2013 |
Den | Update | Locking | PRCL on carrier |
Jenne, Den
We suspect PRM shows significant length to angle coupling due to large oplev beam angle in yaw. Tonight we locked PRCL with ITMs.
We could lock PRCL on carrier to power recycling gain of 15. Lock continued for a few hours but power rin RMS was 0.15.
We triggered and normalized on POP_DC. MICH gain was -1 (filters FM3-5), PRCL gain was -8 (filters FM2,4,5,6,9).
MC_L was OFF during locking.
|
Attachment 1: pop_rin.pdf
|
|
Attachment 2: power.png
|
|
8440
|
Thu Apr 11 03:23:12 2013 |
Den | Update | General | MCL threshold |
MC down script is too slow to block MC_L when the cavity goes out of lock. As a result the loop strongly kicks MC2. We decided to make a threshold inside MCS model on MC TRANS that will block MC_L during lock loss. This is a lower threshold. Upper threshold can be slow and is implemented inside MC up script.
Fast threshold can be set inside MC2 POS. I did not correct MC2 top level medm screen as it is the same for all core optics.
Note: Fast trigger will also block ALS signal if MC loose lock. |
8442
|
Thu Apr 11 03:38:40 2013 |
Den | Update | Locking | angular motion |
Spectra of BS, PRM, ITMX, ITMY are attached with oplevs ON and OFF (in units of urad). Loops reduce RMS from ~2urad to ~0.3urad but phase margin should be increased. REF traces show loop OFF. <-- really?
Note how PRM pitch and yaw spectra are different in the frequency range 0.5 - 7 Hz; yaw is factor of 50 larger then pitch at 2 Hz. |
Attachment 1: oplevs.pdf
|
|
8443
|
Thu Apr 11 10:15:55 2013 |
Steve | Update | Locking | PRM yaw oplev transferfunction |
See Feb 2012 PRM yaw transferfunctions, also check Valera's modified side sensor may effect yaw motion
|
8444
|
Thu Apr 11 11:58:21 2013 |
Jenne | Update | Computers | LSC whitening c-code ready |
The big hold-up with getting the LSC whitening triggering ready has been a problem with running the c-code on the front end models. That problem has now been solved (Thanks Alex!), so I can move forward.
The background:
We want the RFPD whitening filters to be OFF while in acquisition mode, but after we lock, we want to turn the analog whitening (and the digital compensation) ON. The difference between this and the other DoF and filter module triggers is that we must parse the input matrix to see which PD is being used for locking at that time. It is the c-code that parses this matrix that has been causing trouble. I have been testing this code on the c1tst.mdl, which runs on the Y-end computer. Every time I tried to compile and run the c1tst model, the entire Y-end computer would crash.
The solution:
Alex came over to look at things with Jamie and me. In the 2.5 version of the RCG (which we are still using), there is an optimization flag "-O3" in the make file. This optimization, while it can make models run a little faster, has been known in the past to cause problems. Here at the 40m, our make files had an if-statement, so that the c1pem model would compile using the "-O" optimization flag instead, so clearly we had seen the problem here before, probably when Masha was here and running the neural network code on the pem model. In the RCG 2.6 release, all models are compiled using the "-O" flag. We tried compiling the c1tst model with this "-O" optimization, and the model started and the computer is just fine. This solved the problem.
Since we are going to upgrade to RCG 2.6 in the near-ish future anyway, Alex changed our make files so that all models will now compile with the "-O" flag. We should monitor other models when we recompile them, to make sure none of them start running long with the different optimization.
The future:
Implement LSC whitening triggering! |
8445
|
Thu Apr 11 16:29:23 2013 |
Albert | Update | optical tables | Optical Table Toolboxes Update |
Quote: |
There are some tips for how to appy nail polish on YouTube from MKNails and MissJenFABULOUS. Their tips on how to prepare the site for a strong bonding strength are probably helpful for our gold/nickel coated tools. For chrome tools we may need to abrade the surface with a stone or fine sandpaper for it to take the layer better. IF the YouTube videos don't do it for you, then I suggest contacting Tom Evans at LLO to find out what kind of nail polish he uses.
|
This is the tentative box placement per optical table. The toolboxes are going to be color-coded by a combination of two colors (the order won't matter). The side of each toolbox will have a little panel to let you know which box corresponds to which set of colors.
On the diagram, the set of colors is simply the color of the box border and the color of the text.
If anyone has a problem with any of the colors or the box placement let me know before they are installed and become an annoyance:

Box Placements:
ETMY: Box will be attached to the underside of the table by magnets. The box will be on the north side of the optical table.
POY: Box will be attached to the side of the optical table by magnets. The box will be on the west side of the optical table.
BSPRM: Box will be attached to the side of the optical table by magnets. The box will be on the west side of the optical table.
AS: Box will be attached to the side of the optical table by magnets. The box will be on the north side of the optical table.
PSL1: Box will be inside the optical table, in the northeast corner.
PSL2: Box will be inside the optical table, in the southwest corner.
POX: Box will be attached to the side of the optical table by magnets. The box will be on the south side of the optical table.
MC2: Box will be attached to the side of the optical table by magnets. The box will be on the south side of the optical table.
ETMX: Box will be attached to the side of the optical table by magnets. The box will be on the east side of the optical table. |
8446
|
Fri Apr 12 02:56:34 2013 |
Den | Update | Locking | prcl angular motion |
I compared PCRL and XARM angular motions by misaligning the cavities and measuring power RIN. Divergence angles for both cavities I calculated to be 100 urad.
XARM pointing noise sums from input steering TTs, PR2 and PR3 TTs, BS, ITMX, ETMY.
PRCL noise - from input TT, PRM, PR2 and PR3 TT, BS, ITMX, ITMY.
I would expect these noises to be the same as angular motion of different optics measured by oplves is simular. We do not have oplves on TT but they are present in both passes.
I measured RIN and converted to angle. Sharp 1 Hz resonance at XARM pointing spectrum is due to EMTX, it is not seen by PRCL. Other then that XARM is much quiter, especially at 3 - 30 Hz.
As PRM is the main difference in two passes, I checked its spectrum. When PRCL was locked I excited PRM in pitch and yaw. I could see this excitation at RIN only when the peak was 100 times higher then background seismic noise measured by oplev.

|
Attachment 2: oplev_exc.pdf
|
|
8447
|
Fri Apr 12 09:20:32 2013 |
rana | Update | Locking | prcl angular motion |
How is the cavity g-factor accounted for in this calculation? |
8449
|
Fri Apr 12 13:21:34 2013 |
Den | Update | Locking | prcl angular motion |
Quote: |
How is the cavity g-factor accounted for in this calculation?
|
I assume that pointing noise and dc misalignment couples 00 to 01 by a factor theta / theta_cavity
Inside the cavity 01 is suppressed by 2/pi*F*sin(arccos(sqrt(g_cav))).
For the XARM this number is 116 taking g-factor to be 0.32. So all pointing noise couples to power RIN.
Suppression factor inside PRC is 6.5 for g-factor 0.97. This means that 85% of jitter couples to RIN, I accounted for this factor while converting RIN to angle.
I did not consider translational motion of the beam. But still PRC RIN can not be explained by oples readings as we can see exciting optics in pitch and yaw. I suspect this RIN is due to PR3, as it can create stronger motion in yaw than in pitch due to incident angle and translational motion of the mirror. I do not have a number yet. |
8450
|
Sat Apr 13 03:45:51 2013 |
rana | Update | Locking | prcl angular motion |
Maybe its equivalent, but I would have assumed that the input beam is fixed and then calculate the cavity axis rotation and translation. If its small, then the modal expansion is OK. Otherwise, the overlap integral can be used.
For the ETM motion, its a purely translation effect, whereas its tilt for the ITM. For the PRM, it is also a mostly translation effect as calculated at the PRC waist position (ITM face). |
8451
|
Sat Apr 13 23:11:04 2013 |
Den | Update | Locking | prcl angular motion |
Quote: |
For the PRM, it is also a mostly translation effect as calculated at the PRC waist position (ITM face).
|
I made another estimation assuming that PRCL RIN is caused by translation of the cavity axis:
- calibrated RIN to translation, beam waist = 4mm
- measured PRM yaw motion using oplev
- estimated PR3 TT yaw motion: measured BS yaw spectrum with oplev OFF, divided it by pendulum TF with f0=0.9 Hz, Q=100 (BS TF), multiplied it by pendulum TF with f0 = 1.5 Hz, Q = 2 (TT TF with eddy current damping), accounted for BS local damping that reduces Q down to 10.
PRM and TT angular motion to cavity axis translation I estimated as 0.11 mm/urad and 0.22 mm/urad assuming that TTs are flat. We can make a more detailed analysis to account for curvature.
I think beam motion is caused by PR3 and PR2 TT angular motion. I guess yaw motion is larger because horizontal g-factor is closer to unity then vertical. |
Attachment 1: pointing.pdf
|
|
8452
|
Sun Apr 14 15:03:17 2013 |
Manasa | Update | Locking | Fixing - progress |
Quote: |
TRY signals are all gone! Both the PD and the camera show no signal. I went down there to turn off the lights, and look to see what was up, and I don't see any obvious things blocking the beam path on the table. However, Steve has experimentally bungeed the lids down, so I didn't open the box to really look to see what the story is.
Absent TRY, I redid the IFO alignment. Yarm locked, so I assumed it was close enough. I redid Xarm alignment pretty significantly. Transmission was ~0.5, which I got up to ~0.85 (which isn't too bad, since the PMC transmission is 0.74 instead of the usual 0.83). I then aligned MICH, and PRM. After fixing up the BS alignment, the POP beam wasn't hitting the POP PD in the center any more. I centered the beam on the PD, although as Gabriele pointed out to me a week or two ago, we really need to put a lens in front of POP, since the beam is so big. We're never getting the full beam when the cavity flashes, which is not so good.
Den is still working on locking, so I'll let him write the main locking report for the night.
We see that the PRC carrier lock seems to be more stable when we lock MICH with +1 for ITMY and -1 for ITMX, and PRCL with -1 for both ITMs. This indicates that we need to revisit the systematic problem with using the PRM oplev to balance the coils, since that oplev has a relatively wide opening angle. I am working on how to do this.
|
I'm fixing the TRY path.
I misaligned PRM and restored ETMY; but did not see the Y arm flashing. I am going ahead and moving the optics to get Y arm flashing again.
The slider values on the medm screen before touching any of them (for the record):
tt1 tt2 itmy etmy
p -1.3886 0.8443 0.9320 -3.2583
y 0.3249 1.1407 -0.2849 -0.2751 |
8453
|
Sun Apr 14 17:30:14 2013 |
Manasa | Update | Locking | Fixed |
TRY path fixed and ready for normalization.
I used 2" BS at R=50 and R=98 to reflect the Y arm transmission at QPD-Y and TRY PD respectively. The residual beam transmitted by the BS is now steered by a Y1mirror to the camera. With Y arm locked, transmission currently measures 40mW against the expected 70mW. TRY shows 0.45 counts in dataviewer. |
8454
|
Sun Apr 14 17:56:03 2013 |
rana | Update | Locking | prcl angular motion |
Quote: |
Quote: |
For the PRM, it is also a mostly translation effect as calculated at the PRC waist position (ITM face).
|
I made another estimation assuming that PRCL RIN is caused by translation of the cavity axis:
- calibrated RIN to translation, beam waist = 4mm
|
In order to get translation to RIN, we need to know the offset of the input beam from the cavity axis...
This should be possible to calibrate by putting a pitch and yaw excitation lines into the PRM and measuring the RIN.
See secret document from Koji. |
8455
|
Sun Apr 14 23:20:42 2013 |
Den | Update | Locking | Fixed |
Quote: |
TRY path fixed and ready for normalization.
I used 2" BS at R=50 and R=98 to reflect the Y arm transmission at QPD-Y and TRY PD respectively. The residual beam transmitted by the BS is now steered by a Y1mirror to the camera. With Y arm locked, transmission currently measures 40mW against the expected 70mW. TRY shows 0.45 counts in dataviewer.
|
I think it is too much. Incident power to IFO is 1.3 W. Even if we assume no losses and pick-offs on the path to the arms, we should get ~100 uW out of the cavity. I measured X and Y arms transmission to be 60 uW. Did you disable triggering during your measurement? |
8456
|
Mon Apr 15 16:10:52 2013 |
Den | Update | PEM | seismometer isolation kit |
We got granite bases today from the manufacturer. We plan to set them up on Wednesday, 8 am. Please note, there will be an installation mess at Xend, Yend and corner during ~4 hours. Let us know if you have any objections to do this at this particular time.
Installation locations are specified in elog 8270, scheme attached is valid except for Xend. Instrument will be installed on the place of nitrogen containers.
( next to the wall at corner sout-east of the south end ) |
8457
|
Mon Apr 15 17:44:28 2013 |
Albert | Update | optical tables | Optical Table Toolboxes Update |
I decided to go see what the electrical tape looks like on the other tools.
These are the tools I felt were necessary to label with tape: (the others don't seem to be terribly important in terms of not interchanging between boxes)

On another note I'm not sure why electrical tape can't be used on the Allen Wrenches too.
I also plan on ordering smaller flash lights for each table (this one is bulky and unwieldy), and filling in the gaps of the Allen Wrench sets as soon as I get the go-ahead. |
8458
|
Wed Apr 17 02:20:13 2013 |
Manasa | Update | 40m Upgrading | Endtable upgrade for auxiliary green laser : progress |
Assembly progress:
1. ETMY oplev setup has been put together. Because of the shift in the TRY path, I had to modify the oplev path on the table as well.

2. Green laser setup coming together:
(i) Used a HWP after the NPRO to convert s-polarization to p-polarization. (Verified by introducing a PBS after the HWP and then removed later).
(ii) Lens focuses the beam into the Faraday.
(iii) Used steering mirrors to align the beam to the faraday. With 320mW before the Faraday, I was able to get 240mW after the output aperture. The spec sheet for the faraday specifies a 93% transmission; but what I measure is only 75%.

|
8459
|
Thu Apr 18 02:24:58 2013 |
Den | Update | ASC | dither alignment of yarm |
I modified our existing c1ass model to include alignment of input steering TT1 and TT2 for YARM and BS for XARM. Corresponding medm screens are also created.
Dithering:
ETM_PIT: frequency = 6 Hz, amplitude = 100 cnts
ETM_YAW: 8 Hz, 400 cnts
ITM_PIT: 11 Hz, 800 cnts
ITM_YAW: 14 Hz, 1200 cnts
These values were chosen by looking at cavity transmission and length signals - excitation peaks should be high enough but do not shake the optics too much.
Demodulation:
LO for each degree of freedom is mixed with cavity length and transmission signals that are first bandpassed at LO frequency. After mixing low-pass filter is applied. Phase rotation is chosen to minimize Q component
ETM_PIT_LENGTH |
0 |
ETM_YAW_LENGTH |
20 |
ITM_PIT_LENGTH |
0 |
ITM_YAW_LENGTH |
-25 |
ETM_PIT_TRANS |
-5 |
ETM_YAW_TRANS |
10 |
ITM_PIT_TRANS |
10 |
ITM_YAW_TRANS |
-30 |
Sensing matrix:
8 * 8 matrix was measured by providing excitation at 0.03 Hz to optics and measuring the response in the demodulated signals. Excitation amplitude was different for each optics to create cavity transmission fluctuations of 25%
-0.0373333 |
-0.010202 |
-0.018368 |
0.0042552 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0.0432509 |
-0.209207 |
0.0139471 |
0.0780632 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0.0483903 |
-0.0077304 |
0.00917147 |
0.000860323 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
-0.0751211 |
0.699778 |
-0.0115889 |
-0.09944 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0.356164 |
0.121226 |
0.0690162 |
-0.0183074 |
-59.52 |
-21.9863 |
-30.9437 |
13.5582 |
-0.141744 |
1.15369 |
-0.0100607 |
-0.12914 |
-18.8434 |
-105.828 |
-48.213 |
14.8612 |
-0.0446516 |
0.00682156 |
-0.0204571 |
-0.00207764 |
21.3057 |
-1.66971 |
22.1538 |
3.93419 |
0.0278091 |
-0.205367 |
0.0114271 |
0.0648548 |
-4.66919 |
97.9043 |
-6.26847 |
-95.9963 |
Though coherence was > 0.95 during the measurement for each element (except for TT -> Length signals), after inverting and putting it to control servo, loops started to fight each other. So I decided to try a simple diagonal matrix:
TT1_PIT -> ETM_PIT_TRANS, TT1_YAW -> ETM_YAW_TRANS, TT2_PIT -> ITM_PIT_TRANS, TT2_YAW -> ITM_YAW_TRANS,
ITM_PIT -> ETM_PIT_LENGTH, ITM_YAW -> ETM_YAW_LENGTH, ETM_PIT -> ITM_PIT_LENGTH, ETM_YAW -> ITM_YAW_LENGTH
And this matrix worked much better.
Control loops:
8 loops are running at the same time. UGF for input steering loops is 20 mHz, for cavity axis loops - 80 mHz. Slower loop is stronger at low frequencies so that cavity axis servo follows input steering alignment.

Results:
When I started experiment the cavity was misaligned, transmission was ~0.4. Servo was able to align the cavity in ~30 seconds. This time depends on mirrors misalignment as well as input optics and cavity axis misalignment relative to each other.
When servo converged I disturbed ETMY, ITMY, TT1 and TT2. Servo was able to compensate for this.

Excitation lines seen by transmission and length of the cavity are suppressed as shown on the attached as pdf figures.
Note:
Though the servo is able to align the cavity during my tests, this does not mean it will work perfectly any time. So please, if you lock, try to use the servo for alignment. If something goes wrong we'll fix it. This is better then to align IFO by hands every time. |
Attachment 3: YARM_CTRL_DITHER.pdf
|
|
Attachment 4: TRY_DITHER.pdf
|
|
8460
|
Thu Apr 18 02:51:52 2013 |
Den | Update | PSL | FSS slow servo |
Today Rana pointed out that our FSS slow servo is malfunctioning. It has been for a while that our laser temperature control voltage drifted from 0 to 10.
I looked at FSSSlowServo script that runs at op340m and controls the servo. Script disables the servo when MC transmission is less then FSS_LOCKEDLEVEL. But his value was set to 0.2 probably till reference cavity time.
This means that slow servo was not disabled when MC was unlocked. I changed this value to 7000.
Also I increased integral gain from 0.0350 to 0.215 such that fast control is always in the range 4.5 - 5.5 |
8461
|
Thu Apr 18 15:08:14 2013 |
Steve | Update | PEM | seismometer isolation kit in place |
Quote: |
We got granite bases today from the manufacturer. We plan to set them up on Wednesday, 8 am. Please note, there will be an installation mess at Xend, Yend and corner during ~4 hours. Let us know if you have any objections to do this at this particular time.
Installation locations are specified in elog 8270, scheme attached is valid except for Xend. Instrument will be installed on the place of nitrogen containers.
( next to the wall at corner sout-east of the south end )
|
The carpenter shop finished the installation of the 3 granite bases.Rapid Set Cement All high strength non-shrink grout was used.
Compressive strength 3000 PSI at 1 hour and 9000 PSI at day 28 The janitor is still cleaning up after them at the south end.
The soft silicon gas kits are working well with the SS can. Den is making the adaptor plate drawing for the feedthrough. |
Attachment 1: grouting1.jpg
|
|
Attachment 2: grouting2.jpg
|
|
Attachment 3: grouting3.jpg
|
|
Attachment 4: grouting4.png
|
|
8462
|
Thu Apr 18 19:54:11 2013 |
Jenne | Update | LSC | LSC whitening triggering working |
I have implemented automatic triggered switching of the analog whitening (and digital dewhitening).
The trigger is the same as the degree of freedom trigger. On the LSC RFPD screen there is a space to enter the amount of time (in seconds) you would like to wait between receiving a trigger and actually having the whitening filter switch.
The trigger logic is as follows:
* For each column of the LSC input matrix (e.g. AS11 I), check if there is a non-zero element. If there is a non-zero element (indicating that we are using that PD as the error signal for a degree of freedom), check if the corresponding DoF has been triggered. Repeat for all columns of the matrix.
* If either the I or the Q signal from a single PD is being used, send a trigger in the direction of the PD signal conditioning / phase rotation blocks. (Since the whitening happens before the phase rotation, we want to have the whitening state be the same for both the I and Q signals coming from the demod boards.
* Before actually changing the whitening state, wait for the amount of time indicated on the RFPD overview screen.
* Switch the digital dewhitening. If the digital dewhitening is on, send a bit over to the binary I/O to switch the analog whitening on.


This required changing the LSC RF_PD library part so that you can send the trigger to the filter bank from outside that part.. This part is in use by all LSC models, so I'll make sure the LLO people are aware of this change before I commit it to the svn.

While I was working on the LSC model, I also put in a wait between the time that the filter module trigger is received, and when it actually switches the filter modules. So far, this time is defined for a whole filter bank (so all filters for a given DoF still switch at the same time). If I need to go back and make the timing individual for each filter module, I can do that. This new EPICS variable (the WAIT) defaults to zero seconds, so the functionality will not change for anyone who uses this part.

These changes also require 2 pieces of c-code: {userapps}/cds/common/src/wait.c and {userapps}/isc/c1/src/inmtrxparse.c |
8463
|
Thu Apr 18 21:12:56 2013 |
Manasa | Update | Locking | Fixed |
[Den, Manasa]
TRY & TRX power measurement was redone.
TRY measures 66uW and 0.8counts on dataviewer.
TRX measures 70.4uW and 0.84counts on dataviewer.
___________________________
Detector Power
-------------------------------------------------
QPD-Y 33uW (50%)
TRY-PD 29.8uW (49%)
Y-Camera 1%
QPD-X 35.2uW (50%)
TRX-PD 25.1uW (90%)
X-Camera 10%
____________________________ |
8464
|
Fri Apr 19 04:20:41 2013 |
Den | Update | Locking | PRMI on sidebands |
Tonight PRMI was locked on REFL55 I&Q for PRCL and MICH with POP110I as a trigger and power normalizer.
I could see power fluctuations and beam motion on the POP camera very much the same as for carrier. The difference is that carrier stays for hours while sidebands for a few minutes.
POP110:
I&Q analog gains were set to 15 dB. Relative phase was set to 25 degrees by looking at I and Q components when the cavity goes through the resonance. Q should be 0.

REFL55:
Phase rotation was measured by exciting PRM at 20 Hz and minimizing this line at REFL55_Q. I stopped at 33 degrees.
RIN:
I compared power fluctuations of PRCL when it was locked on carrier (POP_DC) and on sidebands (POP110_I).

Time series of POP110_I during one of the locks

POP camera:
|
8465
|
Fri Apr 19 13:28:39 2013 |
Den | Update | ASC | dither alignment of yarm |
I've put 4 scripts into ASS directory for YARM alignment. They should be called from !Scripts YARM button on c1ass main medm screen.
Scripts configure the servo to align the cavity and then save computed offsets. If everything goes right, no tuning of the servo is needed.
Call TRANS MON script to monitor YARM transmission, then "ON" script for aligning the cavity, then "SAVE OFFSETS" and "OFF" for turning the servo off.
ON script:
- sets demodulation gains that I used during OL measuments
- sets LO oscillator frequency and amplitude for each optic
- sets demodulation phase rotation
- sets sensing matrix
- sets servo gains for each degree of freedom
- sets up limits for servo outputs
- gently increases the common gain from 0 to 1
SAVE OFFSETS script:
- holds servo outputs
- sets servo common gain to 0 and clears outputs
- reads old optics DC offsets
- computes new DC offsets
- writes new offsets to C1:SUS-OPTIC_ANGLE_OFFSET channel
- holds off servo outputs
OFF script:
- sets LO amplitudes to 0
- blocks servo outputs
Notes:
SAVE OFFSET script writes DC offsets to C1:OPTIC_ANGLE_OFFSET channel, not to _COMM channel!
LIMITS are set to 500 for cavity axis degrees of freedom and to 0.5 for input steering. Usually servo outputs is ~30% if these numbers. But if something goes wrong, check this for saturation.
DC offsets of all 8 degrees of freedom are written one by one but the whole offset of put at the same time. This works fine so far, but we might change it to ezcastep in future. |
8466
|
Fri Apr 19 15:19:25 2013 |
Jamie | Update | PEM | Trilliums moved from bench to concrete |
I moved the two Trillium seismometers that Den left on the electronics bench out onto the new concrete blocks in the lab that will be their final resting places. I moved one onto the slab at the vertex and the other to the slab at the Y end. I left them both locked and just sitting on the concrete.
The pile of readout electronics that were sitting next to them I moved on to the yellow foam box half way down the MC tube, between the MC tube and the X arm tube. This is obviously not a good place to store them, but I couldn't think of a better place to put them for the moment. |
8467
|
Fri Apr 19 16:58:59 2013 |
Jenne | Update | ASC | Arm A2L measurement scripts 90% working again |
After Den's work with the ASS model this week, all of the channel names were changed (this wasn't pointed out in his elog....grrr), so none of the A2L scripts worked.
They are now back, however there is still some problem with the plotting that I'm not sure I understand yet. So, the measurement works, but I don't think we're saving the results and we certainly aren't plotting them yet.
I wanted to check where the spots are on the mirrors, to make sure Den's stuff is doing what we think it's doing. All of the numbers were within ~1.5mm of center, although Rossa keeps crashing (twice this afternoon?!?), so I can't copy and paste the numbers into the elog.
A near-term goal is to copy over Den's work on the Yarm to the Xarm, so that both arms will auto-align. Also, I need to put the set of alignment scripts in a wrapper, and have that wrapper call-able from the IFO Configure screen.
Also, while thinking about the IFO Configure screen, the "save" scripts weren't working (on Rossa) today, even though I just made them work a week or so ago. Rossa, at least, was unhappy running csh, so I changed the "save" script over to bash. |
8470
|
Mon Apr 22 12:03:58 2013 |
Koji | Update | PSL | PMC aligned too |
PMC aligned. C1:PSL-PMC-PMCTRANSPD improved from 0.72ish to 0.835ish. |
8472
|
Mon Apr 22 17:43:09 2013 |
Steve | Update | 40m Upgrading | ETMY optical table & enclosure is ready for optics |
Quote: |
Quote: |
Enclosure is at the east end. It has it's bottom o-ring in place. It will be ready for optics tomorrow around 5pm
I have to shim out the enclosure, finish leveling the table and cut surgical tubing O-ring for the top.
|
Glued surgical latex tubing with super glue into O-ring shape. The existing in place tubing K-100, OD 0.125" (actual size 0.140"), wall 0.031", ID 0.062".
I have just found out that tolerances on tubing OD are + - 0.026" by the manufacturer. I'm getting larger tubing for better fit.
The table is ready for optics.
Things left to do:
1, finalize o-ring size 2, finish cable feedthrough 3, finalize window connection 4, IR-Thermashield strips for bridge sides 5, replace bridge support post with solid one
|
I'm working on to improve the quality of the enclosure.
The short comings are: more cable feedthroughs needed, latches to anchor top covers air tight and posts to support bending bridges.
Red triangles are compression latches at 10 places to hold the top air tight on surgical tubing
Green lines represent 4 posts of Al 1" OD to support the covers and maximize their eigenfrequencies.
Black crosses are 4 spring loaded push-bottom quick release pins to anchor the top covers to the bridges. This connection will not be air tight.
(quarter-turn wing head fastener have the same problem) I'm thinking of some solution to minimize the leak.
Violet _ steel plate (1" wide, 15" long, 0.125" thick) between the two posts will anchor the quick release pins and make bridge rigid.
Blue rectangle is an other cable feedthrough exiting on the chamber side.
Planning to substitute window with soft - air tight ( Aluminized thin wall hose ) connection to vacuum view port where white circle is representing the Al adaptor ring.
Updated after Wednesday meeting 4-24-2013
|
Attachment 1: more2.jpg
|
|
8473
|
Mon Apr 22 19:48:56 2013 |
Jenne | Update | 40m Upgrading | 4 pins enough? |
Are 4 of these spring loaded pins enough? I'm not sure how one pin can hold 2 lids at each point. It seems like we need 8 pins. |
8474
|
Mon Apr 22 20:17:05 2013 |
Charles | Update | ISS | New Servo w/switching filters |
In my previous post here, a new servo design was discussed. Although the exact design used will depend on the particular noise requirements for the 40m and the Bridge Labs (requirements will be considered separately for each application), I still have to yet to see those formalized. Despite this, I have been simulating an example servo circuit with three switchable stages. The design can be found at: New Servo.
Essentially, this circuit consists of three unity gain buffers that can be switched into different filtering states. Attached is a plot of the transfer function of this particular circuit with successive stages turned on. The curve (0) corresponds to all of the filters being switched off, so the total behavior is that of a unity gain buffer. The curve (1) corresponds to the first stage being turned on with the 2nd and 3rd still acting as unity gain buffers. This first state has a gain of ~80 dB at DC and a pole at ~10 Hz which sets the unity gain crossing at ~100 kHz. The curves (2) and (3) correspond to the second and third stage being turned on, respectively. Each of these stages has a pole at DC (i.e. ~infinite gain) and a zero at 10^4 Hz. For f > 10^4 Hz, these stages have gain ~ 1, as we can see in the transfer function below.
I have also performed some noise analysis of this circuit. Attached are a few plots produced by LISO showing the resistor and op-amp noise separately (it was too cluttered on one plot) at the output node of the servo. Both of these plots have a "Sum Noise" trace, which is the sum for every circuit element and is thus identical between plots. The third noise spectrum included is simply the noise at the output referenced to the input with the previously computed transfer function. I'm not sure if there is a simple method embedded in LISO to reference the noise at the output node to the input, but it should be as simple as numerically dividing the noise spectrum by the transfer function between input and output.
Next, I will be attempting time-dependent simulations of this simple circuit using delayed switches instead of manually controlled ones. |
Attachment 1: Servo_v0.1.png
|
|
Attachment 2: Example_Filter_-_Transfer_Function_(mag).png
|
|
Attachment 3: Example_Filter_-_Transfer_Function_(phase_in_final_state_only).png
|
|
Attachment 4: New_Servo_-_Op-Amp_Noise.jpg
|
|
Attachment 5: New_Servo_-_Resistor_Noise.jpg
|
|
Attachment 6: New_Servo_-_Total_Noise_Input-Referenced.png
|
|
8475
|
Tue Apr 23 15:00:20 2013 |
Jenne | Update | 40m Upgrading | 4 pins enough? |
Quote: |
Are 4 of these spring loaded pins enough? I'm not sure how one pin can hold 2 lids at each point. It seems like we need 8 pins.
|
Steve has explained to me that the pins will go in between the 2 lids, with a big washer, so that one pin holds both lids at the same time. 4 is the right number. |