40m QIL Cryo_Lab CTN SUS_Lab TCS_Lab OMC_Lab CRIME_Lab FEA ENG_Labs OptContFac Mariner WBEEShop
  40m Log, Page 176 of 339  Not logged in ELOG logo
ID Date Author Type Categoryup Subject
  6767   Wed Jun 6 15:16:00 2012 yutaUpdateIOOMC WFS offsets adjusted

MC reflection (C1:IOO-MC_RFPD_INMON) got worse when WFS servos were on. After aligning MC optics, it will be ~0.5 but if I turned on WFS, it became ~0.8.
I measured the beam spot positions on MC optics. They seemed like the same from the measurement yesterday.

# filename      MC1pit  MC2pit  MC3pit  MC1yaw  MC2yaw  MC3yaw  (spot positions in mm)
./dataMCdecenter/MCdecenter201206052111.dat     3.234388        4.234564        2.654212        -6.656221       -0.677541       4.506170       
./dataMCdecenter/MCdecenter201206061420.dat     3.300867        4.567555        2.692971        -6.484464       -1.705443       4.423250

So, I ran /opt/rtcds/caltech/c1/scripts/MC/WFS/WFS_FilterBank_offsets to adjust the WFS offsets.

C1:IOO-MC_RFPD_INMON is now ~ 0.5 and  C1:IOO-MC_TRANS_SUM is now ~ 2.7e3 with WFS on.

  6770   Wed Jun 6 19:46:46 2012 SureshSummaryIOOTip-tilt assembly: current status and work remaining

 

Recent History

The lower blades which I had given to the Physics Workshop for making a vacuum relief hole (using a sinker-EDM process) came back about ten days ago.   Merih Eken <meken@caltech.edu>,  the supervisor at the Physics Dept workshop, handled this matter for us.  The blades were sent to a local EDM machineshop and returned in about three working days ( a weekend intervened). 

IMG_0685.JPG  IMG_0687.JPG

Bob cleaned and handed them over to me yesterday evening.  

Current status

Today I have reassembled the four tip-tilts.  I have repacked them in clean bags (double bagged) shifted them to Clean Optics Cabinet (near the ETMX chamber).  The four tip-tilts are in the bottom-most shelf in the cabinet.  There are also some tip-tilt spares in a separate envelope.

Note:  The mirror holder is now held tightly by the eddy current dampers.  This was done for safety of the wires during transportation from LHO.  The eddy current damper in the front of the mirror has to be retracted to allow the mirror holder to swing free.  It has be to about 1mm away from the suspended mirror holder

Work Remaining

1) We need to install the quadrapus cables.  The connector placement on the BOSEM side will have some issues.  It is best to loosen the BOSEM seating as well as the connector seating screws and then push the cable connector into place.  Caution:  when the connector seating screws on the BOSEM are loosened the flexible ckt could be damaged by the loose connector.

2) Insert the mirrors into the mirror holders and balance the suspension such that the mirror's hang vertical and do not have a large yaw offset.

3) Adjust the wire suspension point height so that the flags are in the center of the BOSEM aperture.  Else they will strike against the

4) We need to adjust the position of the BOSEMs such that the shadow sensor signals are at 50%.  This ensures that all the magnets hang at an appropriate distance from their respective coils.

5) To do (3) we need to set up a shadow sensor read-out set-up for one tip-tilt (four sensors)

 

Attachment 2: IMG_0687.JPG
IMG_0687.JPG
  6791   Mon Jun 11 09:37:16 2012 steveUpdateIOOPMC locked

Quote:

Quote:

IOO Angle & IOO Position QPDs centered.

 PMC trend of 400 and 1200 days

The Innolight 2W based PSL- IOO was implemented in the ~ summer of 2010

 The PMC was locked and the MC followed intantly

Attachment 1: PMClocked.png
PMClocked.png
  6868   Mon Jun 25 15:07:49 2012 yutaUpdateIOOMC beam spot trend

I adjusted MC WFS offsets using /opt/rtcds/caltech/c1/scripts/MC/WFS/WFS_FilterBank_offsets.
Beam spot positions on MC mirrors came back to where it was past few weeks. See the trend below. Trend sometimes shows huge jump, but it's just a bad measurement caused by unlock of MC during the measurement.

I ran /opt/rtcds/caltech/c1/scripts/ASS/MC/mcassMCdecenter to measure beam spot whenever I feel like it (see elog #6727).
Beam spot doesn't move so much (~0.2 mm in standard deviation), which means incident beam from PSL table is quite stable.


MCdecenter.png

  6870   Mon Jun 25 16:21:10 2012 KojiSummaryIOOSelection of motorized mirror mounts

I am considering to have 3 to 6 motorized optical mounts at the PSL and end tables for remote beam steering.

Question 1:

Was there any issue on the PI 3-axis PZT on the PSL?
Why was it disabled (even before the PSL upgrade)?


Question 2:

Do we need two mount at a place? Or we do have one instead?

- Comparing the distance of the steering mirrors and that from the steering mirror to the cavity waist, induced shift
is mostly cancelled by angle adjustemnts of a either of the mounts.
i.e. Induced misalignments by the steering mirrors are nearly degenerated.

We need to move two steering mirrors only for the initial installation, but any drift felt by a cavity can be compensated by a single mirror.

Question 3:
Do we like PI-style 2 or 3 axis PZT mount with analog inputs on the HV amp?
Or do we like "Newport Agilis" style controller with USB connection?

Any opinion?

  6875   Tue Jun 26 22:37:43 2012 yutaUpdateIOOenergized OMC stages

[Koji, Yuta]

We checked that PZTs between SRM and OMC (called OMC stage 1 and 2) is working.
Now we need them to be EPICS channels because they are not connected to digital world right now.

Background:
  For the IFO alignment, what we have been doing for last 2weeks is,

1. Align Y arm to Y end green and maximize green transmission
2. Use PZT2 to maximize TRY (PZT1 is not functioning well. PZT1 Y do a little, but X totally does nothing.)
3. Align BS and X arm to maximize TRX
4. Tune BS and ITMX so that reflection from both arms overlap at AS
5. Align X end green to that we can see bright(~250 uW) TEM00 at transmission

  However, we found that something (Y arm axis or Y end green?) has drifted horizontally and can't make Y green transmission and TRY high level at same time. Because PZT1 is not functioning well, it is hard to compensate beam translation.
  So, now what we have to do is to align Y arm to IR incident beam. That means, we either have to realign Y end green or forget about maximizing green transmission. I think I will leave green as it is for a while because calibration of the beatbox is going on and I want to proceed to PRC.
  Anyway, if we align IFO to the IR incident beam, we see clipping in the AS port. From the contrast measurement last night, we thought clipping comes from somewhere between BS and AS port. So, we need PZTs between BS and AS port working.

What we did:
  1. Turned on 24P 24N power supplies(Sorensen DCS33-33E) in AUX_OMC_SOUTH rack to supply power to AUX_OMC_NORTH rack. 18P 18N cables to OMC_NORTH was unplugged and used by the beatbox, so we reconnected them.

  2. Turned on KEPCO high voltage power supply to supply 150 V to the PZT driver, but it was not functioning well. So, we currently use Aligent HP 6209B instead. Its on the OMC_NORTH rack.

  3. PZT driver output to OMC stage 1 was unplugged. So, we plugged them.

  4. Opened PZT driver (LIGO-D060287), put some signal from Piezo_Drive_in(J4 in schematic), and checked beamspot at AS port is moving. The gain from Piezo_Drive_in to the output (hv_out) was ~20.

  5. We could avoid clipping by putting some offset to OMC stage 2 (or 1) in yaw. That means, the clipping comes from after OMC stage 2.

Conclusion:
  If we can control OMC stage 1 and 2, we can avoid clipping. So, we want them to be EPICS channels.

  6876   Wed Jun 27 03:43:52 2012 yutaSummaryIOOhow to improve mode matching to arms

From the mode scan measurements of the arms(elog #6859), ~6% of mode-mismatch comes from 2nd-order mode. That means we have longitudinal mismatch.

Suppose every mirrors are well positioned and well polished with designed RoC, except for the MMT1-MMT2 length. To get ~6% of mode-mismatch, MMT1-MMT2 length should be ~28cm longer (or ~26cm shorter) than designed value.
I don't know whether this is possible or not, but if they are actually longer(or shorter), we should fix it on the next vent.
I found some related elog on MMT (see #3088).

modematchMCtoARM_design.pngmodematchMCtoARM_MMT1MMT2longer.png


RoC and length parameters I used is below. They maybe wrong because I just guessed them. Please tell me the actual values.
Mirror thickness and effect of the incident angle is not considered yet.

== RoCs ==
MC2 19.965 m (???)
PRM 115.5 m (not used in calculation; just used to guess MC parameters)
ITM flat
ETM 57.37 m

== Lengths ==
MC round trip 27.084 m (???)
MC1 - MC3  0.18 m (???)
MC3 - MMT1 0.884+1.0442 m
MMT1 - MMT2 1.876 m
MMT2 - PRM 2.0079+0.4956 m
PRM - ITM 4.4433+2.2738 m
ITM - ETM 39 m

  6877   Wed Jun 27 10:27:09 2012 ranaSummaryIOOhow to improve mode matching to arms

The MC waist is correct as is the arm RoCs. Most likely the error is in the telescope length or its distance from the MC. Jenne probably has all the numbers and can give us a surface plot showing how the MM degrades as a function of those two parameters.

  6884   Wed Jun 27 16:23:12 2012 yutaUpdateIOOAS and REFL on AP table aligned

I touched steering mirrors for AS and REFL at AP table.
AS beam and REFL beam now hits cameras at center and their respective PDs.

What I did:
  1. Aligned Y arm and X arm.

  2. Locked FPMI and aligned BS + X arm by minimizing ASDC (DC output of the AS55 PD, C1:LSC-ASDC_OUT reached ~ -1.43).

  3. Put -2V offset to the OMC stage 2 in yaw to avoid AS clipping. The offset is currently given by SRS DS345 on AUX_OMC_NORTH rack.

  4. Misaligned ETMs, locked MI in the bright fringe. Maximized ASDC (C1:LSC-ASDC_OUT reached ~ 1.22) by aligning 2 mirrors right after the vacuum chamber. This also centered beam spot on the AS camera.

  5. Locked MI in the dark fringe. Maximized REFLDC (DC output of the REFL55 PD, C1:LSC-REFLDC_OUT reached ~ 2.5) by aligning 2 mirrors after the vacuum chamber. Beam spot on the REFL camera was centered, too.

  6892   Fri Jun 29 02:17:40 2012 yutaUpdateIOOprep for the vent - beam attenuating

[Koji, Jamie, Yuta]

We attenuated the incident beam (1.2 W -> 11 mW) to the vacuum chamber to be ready for the vent.
The beam spot on the MC mirrors didn't changed significantly, which means the incident beam was not shifted so much.

What we did:
 1. Installed HWP, PBS(*) and another HWP between the steering mirrors on PSL table for attenuating the beam. We didn't touched steering mirrors(**), so the incident beam to the IFO should be recovered easily, by just taking HWPs and PBS away. The power to the MC was reduced from 1.2 W to 11 mW.

(*) We stole PBSO from the AS AUX laser setup.
(**) Actually, we accidentally touched one of the steering mirrors, but we recovered them. We did the recovery tweaking the touched nob and minimizing the MC reflection. We confirmed the incident beam was recovered by measuring MC beamspot positions(below).

 2. Aligned PBS by minimizing MC reflection, adjusted first HWP so that the incident beam will be ~10 mW, and adjusted last HWP to minimize MC reflection (make the incident beam to the MC be p-polarization).

 3. To do the alignment and adjusting, we put 100% reflection mirror (instead of 10% BS) for the MC reflection PD to increase the power to the PD. That means, we don't have MC WFS right now.

 4. Tweaked MC servo gains to that we can lock MC in low power mode. It is quite stable right now. We didn't lose lock during beam spot measurement.

 5. Measured beam spot positions on the MC mirrors and convinced that the incident beam was not shifted so much (below). They look like they moved ~0.2 mm, but it is with in the error of the MC beam spot measurement.

# filename      MC1pit  MC2pit  MC3pit  MC1yaw  MC2yaw  MC3yaw  (spot positions in mm)
./dataMCdecenter/MCdecenter201206281154.dat     3.193965        4.247243        2.386126        -6.639432       -0.574460       4.815078    this noon
./dataMCdecenter/MCdecenter201206282245.dat     3.090762        4.140716        2.459465        -6.792872       -0.651146       4.868740    after recovered steering mirrors
./dataMCdecenter/MCdecenter201206290135.dat     2.914584        4.240889        2.149244        -7.117336       -1.494540       4.955329    after beam attenuation

 6. Rewrote matlab code sensemcass.m to python script sensemcass.py. This script is to calculate beam spot positions from the measurement data(see elog #6727). I think we should make senseMCdecenter script better, too, since it takes so much time and can't stop and resume the measurement if MC is unlocked.

  6898   Sat Jun 30 18:31:38 2012 steveUpdateIOOinput telescope beam clipping on Faraday

  We could set up a simple pick  off after the Faraday  and bring it  out the north window of IOO chamber. No monitor needed, just take the cover off when you want to see it.

Most people have no idea how to get the MC through the F

  6899   Sun Jul 1 13:20:09 2012 yutaUpdateIOOMC in low power

I modified autolocker for MC in low power mode (/opt/rtcds/caltech/c1/scripts/MC/autolockMCmain40m_low_power) to make it work with the current directory structure.
autolockMCmain40m_low_power currently runs on op340m and it is in crontab.

34 * * * *  /opt/rtcds/caltech/c1/scripts/general/scripto_cron /opt/rtcds/caltech/c1/scripts/MC/autolockMCmain40m_low_power >/cvs/cds/caltech/logs/scripts/mclock.cronlog 2>&1


MC intra-cavity power:
  Currently, incident beam to the MC measured at PSL table is ~15 mW. Reflected power from MC (C1:IOO-MC_RFPD_DCMON) is 0.94 when MC unlocked, and is 0.088 when locked.
  That means, considering MC1/3 power transmission is 2000ppm (calculated finnesse=1570), intra-cavity power in MC is ~7 W.

  15 mW * (0.94-0.088)/0.94 / 2000ppm = 7 W

  We can increase the power by factor of ~2, if needed.


MC beam spot positions:

  I aligned MC to maximize transmission (C1:IOO-MC_TRANS_SUM_ERR), and measured the MC beam spot posisions in atm, low power.

# filename    MC1pit    MC2pit    MC3pit    MC1yaw    MC2yaw    MC3yaw    (spot positions in mm)
./dataMCdecenter/MCdecenter201206290135.dat    2.914584    4.240889    2.149244    -7.117336    -1.494540    4.955329    before vent
./dataMCdecenter/MCdecenter201207011253.dat    3.294659    3.416584    2.620511    -6.691800    -3.164084    4.806517    after vent

  They look the same within the error of the measurement, except for the spot positions on MC2, which we don't care.


Autolocker should be refined:
  To make autolockMCmain40m_low_power, I copied autolockMCmain40m and just changed

- lockthresh from 500 to 100
- use mcdown_low_power instead of mcdown
- use mcup_low_power instead of mcup

  The difference between mcdown_low_power and mcdown should be only

- ezcawrite C1:IOO-MC_REFL_GAIN 31 for lowpower, 9 for usual
- ezcawrite C1:IOO-MC_VCO_GAIN 10 for lowpower, -5 for usual

  The difference between mcup_low_power and mcup should be only

- ezcawrite C1:IOO-MC_REFL_GAIN 31 for lowpower, 12 for usual
- ezcawrite C1:IOO-MC_VCO_GAIN 31 for lowpower, 25 for usual

  Currently, they are not like that. Somebody good at shell scripts should combine them and make it into one code with an option something like usual/low-power.

  6910   Tue Jul 3 20:51:06 2012 yutaUpdateIOOMC in vacuum is back

MC came back to the state as it was before the vent.

What I did:
  1. Removed beam attenuating setup on PSL table(see elog #6892).

  2. Removed 100% reflection mirror before the MC reflection PD and put 10% BS back, so that we can have MC WFS. Also, I changed C1:IOO-MC_RFPD_DCMON.HOPR to 5.

  3. Removed autolockMCmain40m_low_power from crontab on op340m, and put autolockMCmain40m again.

  4. Aligned MC and ran /opt/rtcds/caltech/c1/scripts/MC/WFS/WFS_FilterBank_offsets to adjust WFS offsets.

  5. Measured beam spot positions. They looked same as before the vent.

# filename    MC1pit    MC2pit    MC3pit    MC1yaw    MC2yaw    MC3yaw    (spot positions in mm)
./dataMCdecenter/MCdecenter201206290135.dat    2.914584    4.240889    2.149244    -7.117336    -1.494540    4.955329    before vent
./dataMCdecenter/MCdecenter201207011253.dat    3.294659    3.416584    2.620511    -6.691800    -3.164084    4.806517    after vent
./dataMCdecenter/MCdecenter201207032009.dat    3.737099    3.994597    3.087857    -6.442053    -0.992543    4.714607    after pumping (now)

  6. I also turned on high voltage power supplies for input and output PZTs

  7. Below is captured Sensoray images of the current state.
ALL_1025408289.bmp


Next:
  I will go on to check if IFO works as it was before or not, but I think we should center MC beam spot positions and see if we can avoid clipping in the near future.

  6982   Wed Jul 18 00:36:22 2012 JenneUpdateIOOWFS oscillating

I was trying to lock and look at the ASS for the Yarm, but the transmitted power was oscillating very near 1Hz.  Eventually I looked at the mode cleaner, and it was also moving around at a similar frequency.  I took spectra of the ETMY SUS damping feedback signals, and they (POS, PIT, YAW) saw this 1Hz motion too (see attached plots...same data, one is a zoom around 1Hz).

As a first place to start, I turned off the WFS, which immediately stopped the MC oscillation.  Turning the WFS back on, the oscillation didn't come back.  I'm not sure what happened to make the WFS bad, but I perhaps had the ASS dither lines on (I've had them on and off, so I'm not sure), although turning off the dither lines didn't make the WFS any better.

As an aside, the MC refl with the WFS off was ~1.5, rather than the ~0.5 with the WFS on, which means that the PSL beam and the MC axis are not well matched.

Attachment 1: Yarm_oscillating_1Hz_while_WFS_crazy_full_17July2012.pdf
Yarm_oscillating_1Hz_while_WFS_crazy_full_17July2012.pdf
Attachment 2: Yarm_oscillating_1Hz_while_WFS_crazy_17July2012.pdf
Yarm_oscillating_1Hz_while_WFS_crazy_17July2012.pdf
  6989   Wed Jul 18 14:25:44 2012 JenneUpdateIOOMC spot position measurements

The script ....../scripts/ASS/MC/mcassMCdecenter  takes ~17 minutes to run.  The biggest time sink is measuring a no-offset-added-to-coil-gains set, in between each measurement set with the coil gain offsets.  This is useful to confirm that the nominal place hasn't changed over the time of the measurement, but maybe we don't need it.  I'm leaving it for now, but if we want to make this faster, that's one of the first things to look at.

Today's measurement:

spot positions in mm (MC1,2,3 pit MC1,2,3 yaw):
[3.5716862287669224, 3.937869278443594, 2.9038058599576595, -6.511822708584913, -0.90364583591421999, 4.8221820002404279]

There doesn't seem to be any spot measurement stuff for any other optics, so I'm going to try to replicate the MC spot measuring script for the Michelson to start.

  6992   Thu Jul 19 02:32:45 2012 JenneUpdateIOOWFS don't come on automatically??

The MC unlocked ~20 min ago, correlated with 2 consecutive earthquakes in Mexico.  The MC came back fine after a few minutes, but the WFS never engaged.  I turned them on by hand.  I think that Yuta mentioned once that he also had to turn the WFS on by hand.  There may be a problem in the unlock/relock catching that needs to be looked at, to make sure the WFS come back on automatically.

Also, someone (Masha and I) should look at the seismic BLRMS.  I have suspected for a few days that they're not telling us everything that we want to know.  Usually, if there's an earthquake close enough / big enough that it pops the MC out of lock, it is clear from the BLRMS that that's what happened, but right now it doesn't look like much of anything....just kind of flat for hours.

  7003   Mon Jul 23 17:39:34 2012 JenneUpdateIOOMC_F vs. MC_L

[Rana, Jenne]

We looked at the different outputs of the MC servo board to make sure they make some kind of sense.  As per my elog 6625, the names of the channels were wrong, but we wanted to confirm that we have something sensible.

Currently, OUT1 of the servo board is called "MC_F" and the SERVO out is called "MC_SERVO".  We looked at the spectrum of each, and the transfer function between them.

You can see that in addition to a 2kHz pole, MC_L also seems to have a 10-100 zero-pole pair.

 

Also, while cleaning things up in the models, I fixed the names of these MCL/MCF channels.  OUT1 is now called MC_L, and is connected to ADC0_0, and SERVO is called MC_F and is connected to ADC0_6.  Both MC_L and MC_F go to the RFM, and thence on to the OAF.  MC_L (which used to be mis-named MC_F) still goes both to the MCS model for actuation on MC2, and to the OAF for MC-OAF-ing.  Right now MC_F is unused in the OAF model, but we can change that later if we want.

 

Attachment 1: MCF_vs_MCL_23July2012.pdf
MCF_vs_MCL_23July2012.pdf
  7035   Thu Jul 26 02:44:17 2012 JenneUpdateIOOCentering the MCR camera

[Yaakov, Jenne]

The short version:

Rana and Koji pointed out to us that the MCR camera view was still not good.  There were 2 problems:

(1) Diagonal stripes through the beam spot.  Yuta and I saw this a week or 2 before he left, but we were bad and didn't elog it, and didn't investigate.  Bad grad students.

(2) Clipping of the left side of the beam (as seen on the monitors).  This wasn't noticed until Yaakov's earlier camera work, since the clipped part of the beam wasn't on the monitor.

The fix for #1 was to partially close the iris which is the first "optic" the beam sees on the AP table after leaving the vacuum. 

The "fix" for #2 was that the wrong beam has been going to the camera for an unknown length of time.  We picked the correct beam, and all is well again.

We moved the 10% BS that splits the main beam into the (MC REFL PD) path and the (MCR camera + WFS) path.  It looked like the transmission through there was close to the edge of the BS.  We didn't think that this was causing the clipping that we saw on the camera (since when we stepped MC1 in Yaw, the beam spot had to move a lot before we saw any clipping), but it seemed like a good idea to make the beam not near the edge of the optic, especially since, being a 2" optic, there was plenty of room, and we were only using ~half of the optic.  We didn't touch anything else in the WFS path, since that looks at the transmission through this BS, but we had to realign the beam onto MC REFL.

The long version:

(1)  The fix for #1 was to partially close the iris which is the first "optic" the beam sees on the AP table after leaving the vacuum.  It looks like that's why the iris was there in the first place.  When we found it this evening, the iris was totally open, so my current theory is that someone was on the AP table doing something, and accidentally bumped the handle for the iris, then left it completely open when they realized that they had touched it.  I think Steve had been doing something on the AP table around then, but since Yuta and I didn't elog our observation (bad grad students!), I can't correlate it with any of Steve's elogs. We were not able to find exactly where this "glow" that the iris is used to obscure comes from, but we traced it as far as the viewport, so there's something going on inside.

(2)  The "fix" for #2 was that the wrong beam has been going to the camera for an unknown length of time.  We picked the correct beam, and all is well again. 

We spent a long time trying to figure out what was going on here.  Eventually, we moved the camera around to different places (i.e. right before the MC REFL PD, with some ND filters, and then we used a window to pick off a piece of the beam right as it comes out of the vacuum before going through the iris, put some ND filters, then the camera).  We thought that right before the MC REFL PD was also being clipped, indicating that the clipping was happening in the vacuum (since the only common things between the MC REFL PD path and the camera path are the iris, which we had removed completely, and a 2" 10% beam splitter.  However, when we looked at a pickoff of the main beam before any beamsplitters, we didn't see any evidence of clipping.  I think that when we had the camera by MC REFL, we could have been clipping on the ND filters that I had placed there.  I didn't think to check that at the time, and it was kind of a pain to mush the camera into the space, so we didn't repeat that.  Then we went back to the nominal MCR camera place to look around.  We discovered that the Y1 which splits the camera path from the WFS path has a ghost beam which is clipping on the top right side (as you look at the face of the optic) of the optic, and this is the beam that was going to the camera (it's a Y1 since we only want a teensy bit of light to go to the camera, the rest goes to the WFS).  There is another beam which is the main beam, going through the center of the optic, which is the one which also reflects and heads to the WFS.  This is the beam which we should have on the camera.  Yaakov put the camera back in it's usual place, and put the correct beam onto the center of the camera.  We did a check to make sure that the main beam isn't clipping, and when I step MC1 yaw, the beam must move ~1.5mm before we start to see any clipping on the very edge of the beam.  To see / measure this, we removed the optic which directs the beam to the camera, and taped an IR card to the inside of the black box.  This is ~about the same distance as to the nominal camera position, which means that the beam would have to move by 1.5mm on the camera to see any clipping.  The MC REFL PD is even farther from MC1 than our IR card, so the beam has to fall off the PD before we see the clipping.  Thus, I'm not worried about any clipping for this main beam.  Moral of the story, if you made it this far:  There wasn't any clipping on any beams going to either the WFS or the MC REFL PD, only the beam going to the camera.

  7069   Wed Aug 1 15:02:29 2012 JenneUpdateIOOIP POS QPD centered

Jamie went out to look at IP POS, and the beam was *way* off.  Even though our alignment is still rough, we're kind of close right now, so Jamie put the beam back on the QPD, but we need to recenter IPPOS after we get good alignment.

  7070   Wed Aug 1 15:14:20 2012 JenneUpdateIOOPSL Pointing QPD signals lost in late-June 2012

I was looking into why we don't have any light on the PSL pointing QPDs, and it turns out that it has been this way since ~June 29th 2012.  I need to look back in the elog to see what was going on on the PSL table that day, but I suspect it has something to do with Yuta and I, working on the beat setup, since this is all very near that area.

Attached is a plot of the loss of signal on the QPDs.

UPDATE:

 We lost IP POS on the same day as we lost the PSL pointing.  See 2nd attachment.  The _S_Calc is the sum, and it almost looks like the light got near the edge of the diode and just kept falling off until it was gone.  The sum started getting lower on May 16th, and then was gone on June 29th.

So far I've gone back as far as Jan 2012, but I still haven't found any data where we *did* have light on IP ANG.  Sad.

UPDATE, UPDATE (like P.P.S.):  June 29th was the day of the vent...see elog 6895.

Attachment 1: IOO_QPDs_lost_midJune2012.png
IOO_QPDs_lost_midJune2012.png
Attachment 2: IP_QPDs_lost_midJune2012.png
IP_QPDs_lost_midJune2012.png
  7088   Mon Aug 6 09:46:31 2012 steveUpdateIOOpoweroutage turns laser off

. Power outage turned off the PSL Innolight laser on Sunday afternoon.  It  was turned back on and  locked happily right on. The green lasers were not effected.

 

CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY

                 FACILITIES MANAGEMENT

            UTILITY & SERVICE INTERRUPTION

 

**PLEASE POST**

 

Building:         CAMPUS WIDE     

 

Date:             SUNDAY, AUGUST 6, 2012          

 

Time:             3:41 PM          

 

Interruption:     ELECTRICAL POWER DISTRIBUTION

  

Contact:          MIKE ANCHONDO, X-4999, OR TOM BRENNAN, X-4984      

 

* THIS PAST SUNDAY AFTERNOON ABOUT 3:40 PM, PASADENA WATER AND POWER

 EXPERIENCED A FAULT ON THEIR POWER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM.  THIS CAUSED

  A SEVERE VOLTAGE SAG WHICH AFFECTED THE CALTECH CAMPUS. THE FAULT WAS

  NOT ON A CALTECH CIRCUIT.

 

(If there is a problem with this Interruption, please notify

the Service Center X-4717 or the above Contact as soon as possible.

If no response is received we will proceed with the interruption.)

        

                        Jerry Thompson,

                        Interim Director of Campus Operations & Maintenance

 

 

  7121   Wed Aug 8 18:01:58 2012 JenneUpdateIOOMC autolocker threshold changed

Jan and Manasa are going to elog about their work later, but it involved putting a BS/window/some kind of pick off in front of the MC Trans QPD, so the total light on the MC Trans QPD is now ~16000 rather than ~26000 counts.  I changed the threshold in the MC autolocker to 5000, so now the MC Trans PD must see at least 5000 counts before the autolocker will engage the boosts, WFS, etc.  Actually, this threshold I believe should have been some several thousand value, but when I went in there, it was set to 500 counts, for low power MC mode during a vent.  It had never gotten put back after the vent to some higher, nominal value.

  7122   Wed Aug 8 19:54:06 2012 ManasaConfigurationIOOMC trans optics configured

Jan and I wanted to measure the ringdown at the IMC. Since the QPD at the MC trans is not fast enough for ringdown measurements, we decided to install a pickoff to include a faster PD while not disturbing much of the current MC trans configuration. The initial configuration had very little space to accommodate the pickoff. So the collimating lens along with the QPD were moved 2 inches closer to the incoming beam. A 50-50 BS was put in front of the QPD and the steering mirror was moved behind to reflect MC trans output to the new PD. The current configuration is shown below with the MC autolocker threshold mentioned in Jenne's elog

Pic1.png

The hunt for a faster PD wasn't satisfactory and we found a couple of PDs that were good for measurements actually didn't work after installing them. The one currently installed is also not satisfactorily fast enough for ringdown measurements. We'll hunt for faster PDs at Bridge tomorrow and replace PDA400. Also the IMC unlocked from time to time....may be we were noisy and didn't master the 'interferometer walk' very well.

 

 

  7126   Wed Aug 8 22:12:30 2012 ranaConfigurationIOOMC trans optics configured

  The PDA255 is a good ringdown detector - Steve can find one in the 40m if you ask him nicely.

  7127   Wed Aug 8 22:17:43 2012 ManasaConfigurationIOOMC trans optics configured

Quote:

  The PDA255 is a good ringdown detector - Steve can find one in the 40m if you ask him nicely.

 We found a PDA255 but it doesn't seem to work. I am not sure if that is one you are mentioning...but I'll ask Steve tomorrow!

  7140   Fri Aug 10 09:54:51 2012 ManasaConfigurationIOOMC trans optics configured

Quote:

Quote:

  The PDA255 is a good ringdown detector - Steve can find one in the 40m if you ask him nicely.

 We found a PDA255 but it doesn't seem to work. I am not sure if that is one you are mentioning...but I'll ask Steve tomorrow!

 I double checked the PDA255 found at the 40m and it is broken/bad. Also there was no success hunting PDs at Bridge. So the MC trans is still in the same configuration. Nothing has changed. I'll try doing ringdown measurements with PDA400 today.

  7142   Fri Aug 10 11:05:33 2012 jamieConfigurationIOOMC trans optics configured

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

  The PDA255 is a good ringdown detector - Steve can find one in the 40m if you ask him nicely.

 We found a PDA255 but it doesn't seem to work. I am not sure if that is one you are mentioning...but I'll ask Steve tomorrow!

 I double checked the PDA255 found at the 40m and it is broken/bad. Also there was no success hunting PDs at Bridge. So the MC trans is still in the same configuration. Nothing has changed. I'll try doing ringdown measurements with PDA400 today.

Can you explain more what "broken/bad" means?  Is there no signal?  Is it noisy?  Glitch?  etc.

  7144   Fri Aug 10 15:05:52 2012 ManasaConfigurationIOOMC trans optics configured

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

  The PDA255 is a good ringdown detector - Steve can find one in the 40m if you ask him nicely.

 We found a PDA255 but it doesn't seem to work. I am not sure if that is one you are mentioning...but I'll ask Steve tomorrow!

 I double checked the PDA255 found at the 40m and it is broken/bad. Also there was no success hunting PDs at Bridge. So the MC trans is still in the same configuration. Nothing has changed. I'll try doing ringdown measurements with PDA400 today.

Can you explain more what "broken/bad" means?  Is there no signal?  Is it noisy?  Glitch?  etc.

 The PD saturates the oscilloscope just by switching on the power; with no real signal at all. But Steve helped locating a PD that is not being used at the AP table. So I will check it and replace the current one if it works!

  7159   Mon Aug 13 12:17:41 2012 ManasaConfigurationIOOPD from AP table removed

The PD (pda255) at the AP table, close to the MC refl , which Steve mentioned to be not in use, has been removed from the table for testing.

  7172   Tue Aug 14 08:43:42 2012 SteveUpdateIOOlaser off and on

The janitor accidentally hit the laser emergency kill switch at room 103  entry door. It did shut down the PSL laser. The laser was turned back on.

Attachment 1: 1day.png
1day.png
  7196   Wed Aug 15 17:17:58 2012 Manasa, JanUpdateIOORingdown measurements

Finally ringdown at IMC conquered and oopsie that came out so clean!

The finesse of the cavity from the current ringdown measurement, F= 453, differs from the measurements made in the document dated 10/1/02 on dcc...not sure if things have changed since then.

While I thought that the bumps observed at the end of the ringdown might be because of the cavity trying to lock itself, Jan commented that they have always existed in these measurements and their source is not known yet.

Ringdown_815.jpg

  7198   Wed Aug 15 18:56:46 2012 YoichiUpdateIOOMC Servo Transfer Function Measurements

 I started working on the characterization of the MC servo.

The current MC servo topology is shown in the figure attached along with a simplified schematic diagram of the MC board. 

A usual way to measure the open loop gain of this servo is to inject a signal from, say, EXCA of the MC board and measure the transfer function from TP2A to TP1A. It works OK at frequencies around the UGF. The second attachment is the OPLTF measured in this way with the Agilent 4395A. The UGF is about 100kHz with the phase margin of 40 to 50 deg. 

Now we have two issues here. First, I expected the UGF to be more than 100kHz, like 300kHz or so. The phase babble is peaked around 100kHz. According to our old measurement (http://nodus.ligo.caltech.edu:8080/40m/1431) the phase babble peak was at a much higher frequency when the FSS was using the reference cavity. One reason could be that the MC is located much farther from the laser than the reference cavity, so that there is some phase lag caused by the time delay. I will make a model of the MC servo system later to check this theory.

The second issue is that, as you can see in the plot, the OPLTF measurement becomes noisy at lower frequencies. With 4395A, which has the minimum IFBW of 2Hz, OPLTF measurement below 10kHz was impossible with the traditional method. We could use SR785 with a long averaging time to improve the SNR, but it requires a patience which I don't have.

The measurement becomes difficult at low frequencies because the loop gain is too high. When the open loop gain (G) is high, the injected signal (x) from EXCA is immediately suppressed by a factor of 1/(1+G) at TP2A. This makes the injected signal hidden in other noises at TP2A.

How do we solve this problem ? Let's consider a simple servo model shown in the third attachment. A traditional OPLTF measurement is done by injecting a signal from EXC port and measuring the TF from TP2 to TP1. The problem was that at TP2, the signal is attenuated by 1/(1+G1*G2), which is too much when G (=G1*G2) is large. However, at TP3, the attenuated signal is amplified by G1. So the injected signal x becomes x*G1/(1+G) at TP3. If G1's contribution to the overall gain G is large enough,  the signal at TP3 is not so small. Then we can easily measure G2 using TP3 and TP1. In a typical situation, G1 is the transfer function of the electric circuits, which we can know either from standalone measurements or from model calculations, and G2 is an interferometer response, which we want to measure. So, by combining the knowledge of G1 and the measurement of G2, we can obtain the overall loop gain G even at lower frequencies.

 The final attachment shows an example of the measurement of G2. In our case, this is the transfer function from MC_Out_Mon to Q-Mon (see the first attachment) . G1 is the transfer function of the MC board. Since G1 is large at low frequencies, we can measure G2 down to 100Hz with a reasonable integration time (10000 cycles per point).

Last night, I took a bunch of TFs with this method. Now I'm analyzing the data to recover the overall gain G. I will post the results later.

Attachment 1: MC-Diagram.png
MC-Diagram.png
Attachment 2: OPLG-10kHz-1MHz.png
OPLG-10kHz-1MHz.png
Attachment 3: SimpleServoDiagram.png
SimpleServoDiagram.png
Attachment 4: OPTG-100Hz-1kHz.png
OPTG-100Hz-1kHz.png
  7199   Wed Aug 15 20:15:51 2012 JanUpdateIOORingdown measurements

Quote:

While I thought that the bumps observed at the end of the ringdown might be because of the cavity trying to lock itself, Jan commented that they have always existed in these measurements and their source is not known yet.

What I meant to say was that in all ringdown measurements that we observed today, the bumps were consistently part the ringdown, and that I have no explanation for the bumps. It should also be mentioned that fitting the bumpy part of the ringdown instead (we used the clean first 10us), the ringdown time is about twice as high. In either case, the ringdown time is significantly smaller than we have seen in documents about previous measurements.

We (basically I) also made one error when producing the plots. The yaxis label of the semi-logarithmic plot should be log(...), not log10(...).

  7200   Wed Aug 15 20:53:48 2012 ManasaUpdateIOORingdown measurements

Quote:

Quote:

While I thought that the bumps observed at the end of the ringdown might be because of the cavity trying to lock itself, Jan commented that they have always existed in these measurements and their source is not known yet.

What I meant to say was that in all ringdown measurements that we observed today, the bumps were consistently part the ringdown, and that I have no explanation for the bumps. It should also be mentioned that fitting the bumpy part of the ringdown instead (we used the clean first 10us), the ringdown time is about twice as high. In either case, the ringdown time is significantly smaller than we have seen in documents about previous measurements.

We (basically I) also made one error when producing the plots. The yaxis label of the semi-logarithmic plot should be log(...), not log10(...).

 I thought about  why we do not find any bumps beyond the exponential fall. Could it be because we neglected fluctuations of voltage in the negative direction and plotted the absolute values?

  7201   Thu Aug 16 01:52:52 2012 YoichiUpdateIOOMC Servo Transfer Function Measurements

Quote:

Last night, I took a bunch of TFs with this method. Now I'm analyzing the data to recover the overall gain G. I will post the results later.

 I calculated the MC open loop transfer function with the combination method. For that, I made a circuit model of the MC board (from the input to the output). The transfer function of this circuit is calculated by SPICE (attachment1). Then it is multiplied by the measured transfer function from the output of the MC board to the input of the MC board (attachment 2) to get the overall transfer function.

The result is shown in the attachment 3. The blue curve is the OPLTF measured with the traditional method. The red curve is the combination method described above. There are some discrepancies between the two curves. The ratio of the two curves (Traditional)/(Combination) is plotted in attachment 4. It seems there is a pole(s) missing from my model of the MC board at around 1MHz. This may come from the omitted op-amps in the MC board model (there are so many op-amps which have flat responses below 1MHz and I omitted most of those). Also the MC board includes many generic filter stages to customize the frequency response. I will open the MC board box to examine what is actually implemented on the board. 

At low frequencies, the two curves are similar but the slope is still different.

I also had to add 83dB of gain to the combined TF to match with the traditional one. I will check where does it come from.

The MC board model (Altium project) is attached as attachment 6. The schematic is attachment 5.

Attachment 1: MC_Board_TF.png
MC_Board_TF.png
Attachment 2: OPTG.png
OPTG.png
Attachment 3: OPLG.png
OPLG.png
Attachment 4: Difference.png
Difference.png
Attachment 5: MC_Board.pdf
MC_Board.pdf
Attachment 6: MC_Board.zip
  7202   Thu Aug 16 05:08:38 2012 YoichiUpdateIOOMC Servo Transfer Function Measurements

Quote:

 Also the MC board includes many generic filter stages to customize the frequency response. I will open the MC board box to examine what is actually implemented on the board. 

 I took out the MC board. Unfortunately, most of the components are surface mounted. So the values of the capacitors are not legible.

I will try my best to guess what is implemented on the board.

Attachment 1: MCBoard1.JPG
MCBoard1.JPG
Attachment 2: MCBoard2.JPG
MCBoard2.JPG
  7205   Thu Aug 16 16:44:55 2012 ManasaConfigurationIOOPD from AP table removed

Quote:

The PD (pda255) at the AP table, close to the MC refl , which Steve mentioned to be not in use, has been removed from the table for testing.

 The PD installed at MC trans to make ringdown measurements has been replaced with the above PDA255. 

  7206   Thu Aug 16 17:28:51 2012 ManasaConfigurationIOOMC trans optics configured

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

  The PDA255 is a good ringdown detector - Steve can find one in the 40m if you ask him nicely.

 We found a PDA255 but it doesn't seem to work. I am not sure if that is one you are mentioning...but I'll ask Steve tomorrow!

 I double checked the PDA255 found at the 40m and it is broken/bad. Also there was no success hunting PDs at Bridge. So the MC trans is still in the same configuration. Nothing has changed. I'll try doing ringdown measurements with PDA400 today.

Can you explain more what "broken/bad" means?  Is there no signal?  Is it noisy?  Glitch?  etc.

 The PD saturates the oscilloscope just by switching on the power; with no real signal at all. But Steve helped locating a PD that is not being used at the AP table. So I will check it and replace the current one if it works!

Koji opened up the PD and found that the screw connecting the PD to the pole was doing an additional job as well; connecting the power cable to the PD output in the inside. The PD is now fixed! Yippie...we have two PDA255 s at 40m now!!

  7239   Tue Aug 21 00:35:25 2012 ranaSummaryIOOVisibilities and Chrome

MC and PMC vis:

MC REFL Unlocked    = 4.4

MC REFL Locked      = 0.67

 1 - Locked/Unlocked = 85%

 

PMC REFL Unlocked   = 0.270

PMC REFL Locked     = 0.013

 1 - Locked/Unlocked = 95%

I checked (by looking through recent trends) that the zero level is zero on both channels. I tried to do a proper mode scan, but we have lost the PSL fast channels during the upgrade sadly. Also, the DC signal for the PMC REFL needs some gain. Unlocked level should be more like 3-5 V.

Also used the instructions from this page to add Google's sources to rosalba's apt-get list and then installed Chrome.

Attachment 1: Untitled.pdf
Untitled.pdf
  7263   Thu Aug 23 22:21:13 2012 ranaConfigurationIOOMCL turned back on

I turned on some filters and gain in the SUS-MC2_MCL filter bank tonight so as suppress the seismic noise influence on MC_F. This may help the MC stay in lock in the daytime.

Koji updated the mcdown and mcup scripts to turn the MCL path on and off and to engage the Boost filters at the right time.

The attached PNG shows the MCL screen with the filters all ON. In this state the crossover frequency is ~45 Hz. MC_F at low frequencies is reduced by more than 10x.

I also think that this may help the X-Arm lock. The number of fringes per second should be 2-3x less.

Attachment 1: mcl-screen.png
mcl-screen.png
Attachment 2: mcf-noise.pdf
mcf-noise.pdf
  7264   Thu Aug 23 22:41:04 2012 KojiUpdateIOOMC Autolocker update

[Koji Rana]

MC Autolocker was updated. (i.e. mcup and mcdown were updated)

mcup:

  • Turn on the MCL input and output switches
  • Change the MCL gain from 0 to -300 with nominal ramp time of 5sec
  • Turn on FM2, FM5, MF7 after a sleep of 5sec. Note: FM1 FM8 FM9 are always on.
  • Set the offset of 42 counts
  • Turn on the offset

# Turn on MCL servo loop
echo mcup: Turning on MCL servo loop...
date
ezcaswitch C1:SUS-MC2_MCL INPUT OUTPUT ON
ezcawrite C1:SUS-MC2_MCL_GAIN -300
sleep 5
ezcaswitch C1:SUS-MC2_MCL FM2 FM5 FM7 ON
# Offset to take off the ADC offset of MC_F
ezcawrite C1:SUS-MC2_MCL_OFFSET 42
ezcaswitch C1:SUS-MC2_MCL OFFSET ON


This offset of 42 count is applied in order to compensate the ADC offset of MC_F channel.
The MCL servo squishes the MC_F signal. i.e. The DC component of MC_F goes to zero.
However, if the ADC of MC_F has an offset, the actual analog MC_F signal, which is fed to FSS BOX,
still keep some offset. This analog offset causes deviation from the operating point of the FSS (i.e. 5V).

mcdown:

  • Basically the revese process of mcup.
  • This script keeps FM1 FM8 FM9 turned on.

# Turn off MCL servo loop
echo mcdown: Turning off MCL servo loop...
date
ezcawrite C1:SUS-MC2_MCL_GAIN 0
ezcaswitch C1:SUS-MC2_MCL INPUT OUTPUT OFFSET FMALL OFF FM1 FM8 FM9 ON
# Remove Offset to take off the ADC offset of MC_F
ezcawrite C1:SUS-MC2_MCL_OFFSET 0

  7268   Fri Aug 24 09:21:45 2012 SteveUpdateIOOMC2 damping restored

Quote:

I turned on some filters and gain in the SUS-MC2_MCL filter bank tonight so as suppress the seismic noise influence on MC_F. This may help the MC stay in lock in the daytime.

Koji updated the mcdown and mcup scripts to turn the MCL path on and off and to engage the Boost filters at the right time.

The attached PNG shows the MCL screen with the filters all ON. In this state the crossover frequency is ~45 Hz. MC_F at low frequencies is reduced by more than 10x.

I also think that this may help the X-Arm lock. The number of fringes per second should be 2-3x less.

 

Attachment 1: 10hrsMC2.png
10hrsMC2.png
  7275   Fri Aug 24 22:01:15 2012 JenneUpdateIOOMC spot position - close

I am getting closer with the MC spot centering.  I had everything but MC1 really great, but then I tweaked MC1's pointing, and things all went to hell. 

I have to go home to let Butter out, but I'll be back tomorrow, and I'll try to get back to where I was in the 2nd to last measurement in the plot below.

I recenterd the WFS after moving the input beam, so that the beam was hitting the WFS at all.

Attachment 1: MCdecenter_24Aug2012.png
MCdecenter_24Aug2012.png
  7276   Sun Aug 26 11:53:09 2012 JenneUpdateIOOMC2 getting kicked up regularly

We need to re-look at this new MC autolocker stuff, and the new MCL filters.

MC2 is getting kicked up (sometimes the watchdog trips, sometimes it just comes close) pretty regularly.  I'm not sure yet what is causing this, but we need to deal with it since it's pretty obnoxious.

  7277   Sun Aug 26 12:26:44 2012 JenneUpdateIOOMC spot position - not done yet

Quote:

I am getting closer with the MC spot centering.  I had everything but MC1 really great, but then I tweaked MC1's pointing, and things all went to hell. 

I have to go home to let Butter out, but I'll be back tomorrow, and I'll try to get back to where I was in the 2nd to last measurement in the plot below.

I recenterd the WFS after moving the input beam, so that the beam was hitting the WFS at all.

 We are being riddled with earthquakes.  Brawley, CA (~150 miles from here) has had 9 earthquakes in the last hour, and they're getting bigger (the last 4 have been 4-point-somethings).  I may try to come back later, but right now the MC won't stay locked for the ~5 minutes it takes to measure spot positions.  Koji and Jamie said they were coming in today, so they can call me if they want help.

  7280   Mon Aug 27 01:05:36 2012 JenneUpdateIOOMC spot position - callin' it quits
spot positions in mm (MC1,2,3 pit MC1,2,3 yaw):
[-0.98675603448324423, -0.94064212026141558, 2.6749179375892544, -0.65896393156684185, -0.4508281650731974, -0.55109088188064204]

MC3 pitch isn't what I'd like it to be, but MC1 and MC3 pitch aren't quite acting in relation to each other how I'd expect. Sometimes they move in common, sometimes differentially, which is confusing since I have only ever been touching (on the PSL table) the last steering mirror before the beam is launched into the vacuum.

The latest few measurements have all been with the WFS off, but reflection of ~0.48 . I haven't figured out why yet, but MC1 and MC3 yaw WFS outputs start to escalate shortly after the WFS becoming engaged, and they keep knocking the MC out of lock, so I'm leaving them off for now, to be investigated in the morning.
Attachment 1: MCdecenter_26Aug2012.png
MCdecenter_26Aug2012.png
  7284   Mon Aug 27 12:03:54 2012 KojiUpdateIOOMC spot position - callin' it quits

The MC REFL path was checked. ==> Some clippings were fixed. MC WFS is working now.

- MC was aligned manually

- The steering mirror for the WFS and camera was clipping the beam. => FIxed

- The WFS spots were realigned.

- There was small clipping on the MC REFL RFPD. ==> Fixed

  7288   Mon Aug 27 18:32:48 2012 JenneUpdateIOOMC spot position - Jenne is stupid

Quote:

The MC REFL path was checked. ==> Some clippings were fixed. MC WFS is working now.

- MC was aligned manually

- The steering mirror for the WFS and camera was clipping the beam. => FIxed

- The WFS spots were realigned.

- There was small clipping on the MC REFL RFPD. ==> Fixed

 We have figured out that some of these measurements, those with the WFS off, were also not allowing the dither lines through, so no dither, so no actual measurement.

Jamie is fixing up the model so we can force the WFS to stay off, but allow the dither lines to go through.  He'll elog things later.

  7289   Mon Aug 27 18:59:24 2012 jamieUpdateIOOMC ASC screen was confusing - Jenne is not stupid

Quote:

We have figured out that some of these measurements, those with the WFS off, were also not allowing the dither lines through, so no dither, so no actual measurement.

Jamie is fixing up the model so we can force the WFS to stay off, but allow the dither lines to go through.  He'll elog things later.

In the c1ioo model there were filter modules at the output of the WFS output matrix, right before going to the MC SUS ASCs but right after the dither line inputs, that were not exposed in the C1IOO_WFS_OVERVIEW screen (bad!).  I switched the order of these modules and the dither sums, so these output filters are now before the dither inputs.  This will allow us to turn off all the WFS feedback while still allowing the dither lines.

I updated the medm screens as well (see attached images).

Attachment 1: Screenshot-1.png
Screenshot-1.png
Attachment 2: Screenshot-2.png
Screenshot-2.png
  7290   Mon Aug 27 23:52:59 2012 JenneUpdateIOOMC Spots centered

Finally!

Jamie and I have the MC spots centered.  We did the normal move the input beam, realign jazz for a while, then when we got close, used the "move MC2 spot" scripts to get the MC2 spot back to ~center.

This was way easier when the measurements were real, and not just noise.  Funny that.

The dark blue spot is the farthest from 0 in pitch, and it is 1.04mm.  The cyan and yellow we've done a pretty good job of getting them equally far from zero.  Since we aren't translating the beam, we can't get better than the point at which the cyan and yellow curves cross.

Attachment 1: MCdecenter_26Aug2012.png
MCdecenter_26Aug2012.png
ELOG V3.1.3-