40m QIL Cryo_Lab CTN SUS_Lab TCS_Lab OMC_Lab CRIME_Lab FEA ENG_Labs OptContFac Mariner WBEEShop
  40m Log, Page 296 of 341  Not logged in ELOG logo
ID Date Author Type Categoryup Subject
  6650   Fri May 18 15:25:15 2012 steveUpdateSUSAR coated lens swapped in at ETMX oplev

Quote:

 ETMX oplev had 6 mm diameter beam on the qpd.  I relayed the beam path with 2 lenses  to get back  3 mm beam on the qpd

BRC 037  -100 Bi _concave lens and PCX 25  200 VIS do the job. Unfortunately the concave lens has the AR 1064.

 

 

 The uncoated bi-concave lens was replaced by AR coated one: KBC 037 -100 AR.14 resulting 35% count increase on qpd

Attachment 1: ETMXoplevlensAR.png
ETMXoplevlensAR.png
  6656   Tue May 22 08:03:01 2012 steveUpdateSUSETMY oplev gets new laser

Quote:

 

 The typical sign of a dying gas laser is that it glows for a few minutes only. The power supplies are fine.

Two new  JDS - Uniphase 1103P lasers ( NT64-104 )  arriving on Monday, May 21

 Yesterday I swapped in new He/Ne laser with output power 3.5 mW  The return spot on qpd is large ~6mm in diameter and 20,500 counts

The spot size reduction require similar layout as ETMX oplev.

  6680   Fri May 25 02:56:44 2012 DenUpdateSUSMC3 local damping

I've terminated input to AA filters and measured signal to coils C1:SUS-MC3_??COIL_OUT.

DSC_4305.JPG

 

I compared this noise to the signal when OSEM are connected to ADC.

    osem_noise.png

 

I made BNC -> LEMO board such that all LEMOs have the same signal equal to BNC signal. I provided excitation of 50 mV as white noise to the input of the AA filter and measured coherence between excitation and MC3 coil driver. The path is

AA -> ICS 110 -> Pentium -> Pentek -> AI -> Univ Dewhitening -> Coil Driver

As all inputs have the same signal, matrices that recombine the signals should not affect coherence. But what I got for coherence between AA IN / Dewhitening OUT is

osem_coil.png

  6681   Fri May 25 13:24:48 2012 DenUpdateSUSMC3

AA IN -> COIL DRIVER IN transfer function for MC3

freq_resp.png

I've provided excitation to the AA input, the same for all OSEM channels. In the digital domain coherence between C1:SUS-MC3_ULSEN_INMON / C1:SUS-MC3_ULCOIL_INMON and other channels OSEM -> COIL is 1 starting from 0.1Hz.

test_dig.png

The only thing left to understand is why the coherence AA IN / COIL DRIVER IN measured in the analog domain is not 1 in the frequency range 0.1 - 1 Hz. It does not look like just SRS noise. I've connected Ch 1 and 2 to the source, coherence is close to 1.

  6706   Tue May 29 15:55:22 2012 steveUpdateSUSETMY oplev spot size reduced

Quote:

Quote:

 

 The typical sign of a dying gas laser is that it glows for a few minutes only. The power supplies are fine.

Two new  JDS - Uniphase 1103P lasers ( NT64-104 )  arriving on Monday, May 21

 Yesterday I swapped in new He/Ne laser with output power 3.5 mW  The return spot on qpd is large ~6mm in diameter and 20,500 counts

The spot size reduction require similar layout as ETMX oplev.

 The oplev path is relayed and the spot size on the qpd is reduced. I still have to clean up and replace "Miki Mouse" lens holder.

There was no IP-ANG coming out of the chamber at this time!

Attachment 1: ETMYoplev.jpg
ETMYoplev.jpg
Attachment 2: IMG_1243.JPG
IMG_1243.JPG
  6710   Tue May 29 21:34:08 2012 JenneUpdateSUSETMY oplev spot size reduced

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

 

 The typical sign of a dying gas laser is that it glows for a few minutes only. The power supplies are fine.

Two new  JDS - Uniphase 1103P lasers ( NT64-104 )  arriving on Monday, May 21

 Yesterday I swapped in new He/Ne laser with output power 3.5 mW  The return spot on qpd is large ~6mm in diameter and 20,500 counts

The spot size reduction require similar layout as ETMX oplev.

 The oplev path is relayed and the spot size on the qpd is reduced. I still have to clean up and replace "Miki Mouse" lens holder.

 Flipped the sign on the ETMY oplev servo gain, since it was wrong.  (It was "-" for both, now it is "+" for both)

  6743   Fri Jun 1 14:56:08 2012 JamieUpdateSUSOplevs all different, messed up

For some reason the state of the oplevs is completely different for almost every suspension.  They have different sets of filters in the bank, and different filters engaged.  wtf?  How did this happen?  Is this correct?  Do we expect that the state of the oplevs should be different on all the different suspensions?  I wouldn't have thought so.

I discovered this because the PRM is unstable with the oplevs engaged.  I don't think it was yesterday.  Is something hidden changing the oplev settings?

Attachment 1: oplevs.png
oplevs.png
  6744   Fri Jun 1 18:07:32 2012 steveUpdateSUSOplevs servo values

Quote:

For some reason the state of the oplevs is completely different for almost every suspension.  They have different sets of filters in the bank, and different filters engaged.  wtf?  How did this happen?  Is this correct?  Do we expect that the state of the oplevs should be different on all the different suspensions?  I wouldn't have thought so.

I discovered this because the PRM is unstable with the oplevs engaged.  I don't think it was yesterday.  Is something hidden changing the oplev settings?

 As of February 23, 2012 when oplev PIT and YAW transfer functions were taken

 

OPLEV SERVO 300^ 2:0 BR ELP RLP RES GAIN QPD counts OD mm           
                   
ETMY pit 300^ 2:0 BR 35 80 0.5 -1.5 15,500 ~1  
ETMY yaw 300^ 2:0 BR 35 80 0.6 -1.0      
ETMX pit 300^ 2:0 BR 35 80 0.5 0.5 1,500 ~1.5  
ETMX yaw 300^ 2:0 BR 35 80 0.6 1.0      
ITMY pit 300^ 2:0 BR   80   2.0 15,000 ~2.5  
ITMY yaw 300^ 2:0 BR   80   -4.0      
ITMX pit 300^ 2:0 BR   80   1.0 1,350 ~1.5  
ITMX yaw 300^ 2:0 BR   80   -2.0      
BS pit 300^ 2:0 BR 50     0.5 3,500 ~1  
BS yaw 300^ 2:0   50   3.3 -1.0      
PRM pit 300^ 2:0 BR     3.3 1.0 4,000 ~2  
PRM yaw 300^ 2:0 BR 35   3.3,  4 -0.5      
SRM pit 300^ 2:0 BR 40     -2.0 2,600 ~2.5  
SRM yaw 300^ 2:0 BR 40     2.0      

 

  6745   Fri Jun 1 19:48:54 2012 ranaUpdateSUSOplevs all different, messed up

 

 Its a good question, but the answer is yes. At some level all of the OL servos should be different to handle the different mechanical resonances of the suspension as well as the optical table's acoustic noise and the different noise requirements for the difference optical cavities.

However, it would be better to have the same basic structure and then one or two customization filters.

  6752   Tue Jun 5 09:32:12 2012 steveUpdateSUSPRM oscillation

What not to do:

The PRM oplev servo was left on and it was driving this oscillation overnight.

Attachment 1: PRMosc.png
PRMosc.png
  6764   Wed Jun 6 09:27:09 2012 steveUpdateSUSPRM damping restored

Quote:

What not to do:

The PRM oplev servo was left on and it was driving this oscillation overnight.

 Oplev servo turned off and sus damping restored. What is kicking up the PRM?

Attachment 1: PRMwhat.png
PRMwhat.png
  6766   Wed Jun 6 14:36:58 2012 steveUpdateSUSETMY oplev work finished

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

 

 The typical sign of a dying gas laser is that it glows for a few minutes only. The power supplies are fine.

Two new  JDS - Uniphase 1103P lasers ( NT64-104 )  arriving on Monday, May 21

 Yesterday I swapped in new He/Ne laser with output power 3.5 mW  The return spot on qpd is large ~6mm in diameter and 20,500 counts

The spot size reduction require similar layout as ETMX oplev.

 The oplev path is relayed and the spot size on the qpd is reduced. I still have to clean up and replace "Miki Mouse" lens holder.

 Late entry for Monday morning June 4, 2012

Cables were stress relieved. Cable entry - exit ports enlarged. Air gaps were minimized.

  6781   Thu Jun 7 08:12:20 2012 steveUpdateSUSPRM is still oscillating

Quote:

Quote:

What not to do:

The PRM oplev servo was left on and it was driving this oscillation overnight.

 Oplev servo turned off and sus damping restored. What is kicking up the PRM?

 The PRM oscillation stopped by turnig off oplev servo.

Do not turn Oplev Servo on when PRM is missaligned !

 

Attachment 1: PRMoscil.png
PRMoscil.png
  6785   Thu Jun 7 13:18:42 2012 ranaUpdateSUSPRM is still oscillating

  Set the PRM OL servo gains to zero until someone can take care of this. Turning off the buttons doesn't help anything if people run the alignment scripts.

  6786   Thu Jun 7 13:25:37 2012 KojiUpdateSUSPRM is still oscillating

Done.

C1:SUS-PRM_OLPIT_GAIN 1.0 -> 0
C1:SUS-PRM_OLYAW_GAIN -0.7 -> 0
 

Quote:

  Set the PRM OL servo gains to zero until someone can take care of this. Turning off the buttons doesn't help anything if people run the alignment scripts.

 

  6788   Thu Jun 7 18:46:13 2012 yutaUpdateSUSPRM oplev centered

PRM oplev beam was not hitting on the QPD since Jun 1, so I centered it. I reverted the oplev servo gains and now oplev servo looks fine.

C1:SUS-PRM_OLPIT_GAIN = 1.0
C1:SUS-PRM_OLYAW_GAIN = -0.7

There's SIDE to UL/UR/LL/LR coil element in PRM TO_COIL matrix. They were 0 until Mar 31, 2012, but someone changed them to -0.160. I couldn't find elog about it.
Same thing happened to BS on Mar 13, 2012 (see elog #6409), so I think somebody did the same thing to PRM.

  6799   Tue Jun 12 02:07:42 2012 JenneUpdateSUSPRM oplevs left off

Yuta claims he fixed the PRM oplev by centering it the other day, but no one has left it on and watched it for a long while, to make sure it's okay.  We watched it now for ~2 min, and it was good, but we're leaving the oplevs off anyway for the night.  Tomorrow we should restore PRM (it's currently restored), turn on the oplevs, and let it sit to make sure it doesn't go crazy.

 

  6804   Tue Jun 12 16:33:32 2012 steveUpdateSUSPRM oplevs servo ON for confirmation

Quote:

Yuta claims he fixed the PRM oplev by centering it the other day, but no one has left it on and watched it for a long while, to make sure it's okay.  We watched it now for ~2 min, and it was good, but we're leaving the oplevs off anyway for the night.  Tomorrow we should restore PRM (it's currently restored), turn on the oplevs, and let it sit to make sure it doesn't go crazy.

 

 PRM oplev servo was turned on with PITgain 0.5  and YAWgain  -0.7

Note: gain settings were PIT  1.0  and  YAW --0.5   on Jun 1, 2012 that I measured Feb 23, 2012

  6805   Tue Jun 12 17:04:55 2012 steveUpdateSUSPRM oplevs servo is still bad

Quote:

Quote:

Yuta claims he fixed the PRM oplev by centering it the other day, but no one has left it on and watched it for a long while, to make sure it's okay.  We watched it now for ~2 min, and it was good, but we're leaving the oplevs off anyway for the night.  Tomorrow we should restore PRM (it's currently restored), turn on the oplevs, and let it sit to make sure it doesn't go crazy.

 

 PRM oplev servo was turned on with PITgain 0.5  and YAWgain  -0.7

Note: gain settings were PIT  1.0  and  YAW --0.5   on Jun 1, 2012 that I measured Feb 23, 2012

 It is still oscillating. Gains turned down to zero.

Attachment 1: PRMolvstillosc.png
PRMolvstillosc.png
  6814   Wed Jun 13 11:19:05 2012 steveUpdateSUSIDC receptacles clamped

The MC_ IDC 64 pin cables from sat. amplifiers to junction-interface-board towards  whitening - dewhitening at the back of rack 1 X 5 are finally  clamped with

All other sus cables of the same kind have the correct short latch arm to lock them in for reliable contact.

Attachment 1: IMG_1341.JPG
IMG_1341.JPG
  6952   Tue Jul 10 17:47:55 2012 yutaUpdateSUSPRM oplevs fixed

I centetered PRM oplev, lowered gain and PRM oplev servo is not oscillating any more.
It is OK for more than a softball practice.

C1:SUS-PRM_OLPIT_GAIN = 0.15  (was 0.5)
C1:SUS-PRM_OLYAW_GAIN = -0.3  (was 0.7)

Openloop transfer function:
  Oplev Pitch: gain ~ 12 at 0.69 Hz resonance
  Oplev Yaw: gain ~ 18 at 0.83 Hz resonance
PRMoplevpitOLTF.pngPRMoplevyawOLTF.png

  I adjusted the gain so that oplev damps resonance as much as possible, but not introduce additional noise. I did no calculation, but just measured OSEM spectra (SUSPIT and SUSYAW). Below, you can see the noise reduces at resonance when oplev servo is on, and not increasing at other frequencies. It was introducing noise before. Someone should do more systematic adjustment of oplev servos for all the optics.

PRMOplevSpectra20120710.png
 

  6960   Wed Jul 11 13:36:58 2012 yutaUpdateSUSOSEM and oplev spectra of optics

Below is angular spectra of every suspended core optics.
As you can see, there's a peak at 3.3 Hz for BS and PRM angular motion. Compared with other optics, they look large.

I briefly checked suspension filters and found that BounceRoll filters and f2a filters are not turned on for BS.
I checked elog and there was no reason for them to be off, so I turned them on. It didn't change angular spectra very much, though.

I'm going to check BS suspension damping and see where 3.3 Hz peak comes from.

Note that oplev quadrant sums are different for every optics, so we can't simply compare angular motion between optics from OLPIT/OLYAW. But for OSEMs, there are "cnt2um" which calibrate sensor outputs into um. and input matrix should be normalized, so we can compare SUSPIT/SUSYAW with other optics.

I centered all oplevs to do this measurement.
Quadrant sum (C1:SUS-XXX_OLSUM) for each optic now is

ITMX   ITMY   ETMX   ETMY     BS    PRM    SRM
2456  14630   1476  14885   3650   4302   2937   (counts)


OLPITYAW.png   SUSPITYAW.png

  6964   Wed Jul 11 16:19:08 2012 yutaUpdateSUSoplev servo phiology

I heard that Steve did great work on oplev in Feb 2012.
Here's summary what happened to oplev since then.
Someone changed oplev filters and gain. I couldn't find elog about it. Does anyone know?

Quadrant sum:
  Quadrant sum (C1:SUS-XXX_OLSUM) for each optic now and in Feb 2012 is

  ITMX   ITMY   ETMX   ETMY     BS    PRM    SRM
  2456  14630   1476  14885   3650   4302   2937   counts (now)
  1300  14500    900   9000   3500   4000   2600   counts (Feb 6, 2012 elog
#6256)
 0.025  0.3    0.2    0.2    0.05   0.06   0.04    mW on QPD (Feb 6, 2012 elog
#6256)
  1350  15000   1500  15500   3500   4000   2600   counts (Feb 23, 2012 elog
#6744)

  ETMX oplev laser was replaced on May 22, 2012, and quadrant sum was 20500 counts at that time (elog #6656).


Oplev servo openloop transfer functions:
  In Feb 2012, gains were adjusted and filter settings are recorded by Steve.
  For all pitch OLTF, see elog #6309.
  For all yaw OLTF, see elog #6323.

  All the filters in Feb is listed in elog #6744.
  Filters now are messed up, as Jamie pointed out in elog #6743.
  Below is the current filter settings.

  I turned ELP and RLP filters on, which wasn't on to cut-off noises at higher frequencies.
  I left resonant gains of ETMs because I don't know what they are for.
  I put ELP35 for ITMs, BS, PRM and SRM. I put RLP80 for BS, PRM and SRM.
  I will leave ELP35 off for BS and SRM because they oscillate currently. ELP50 and ELP40 is on for a substitution. I will readjust them soon.

  I don't know who changed all gains (except for PRM, which I adjusted in elog #6952). It doen't look like it is because of change in quadrant sum.
  I also don't know who deleted 3.3 Hz resonant gain for BS.

  I put all similar filters in same place to make it organized. Now, basic fitlers are organized. We may need some resonant gains for each optics.

OPLEV SERVO 300^2:0 BR ELP RLP RES GAIN QPD counts
filter position FM1 FM5 FM9 FM4 FM3, FM4    
ETMY pit 300^2:0 BR 35 80

0.5 (off)

-0.2 (was -1.5) 14,900
ETMY yaw 300^2:0 BR 35 80 0.6 (off) -0.2 (was -1.0)  
ETMX pit 300^2:0 BR 35 80 0.5 (off) 0.5 1,500
ETMX yaw 300^2:0 BR 35 80 0.6 (off) 0.6 (was 1.0)  
ITMY pit 300^2:0 BR 35 80   2.1 (was 2.0) 14,600
ITMY yaw 300^2:0 BR 35 80   -2.0 (was -4.0)  
ITMX pit 300^2:0 BR 35 80   2.6 (was 1.0) 2,500
ITMX yaw 300^2:0 BR 35 80   -1.6 (was-2.0)  
BS pit 300^2:0 BR 50 (FM10) 80   0.6 (was 0.5) 3,700
BS yaw 300^2:0 BR 50 (FM10) 80 (3.3 is some how deleted) -0.6 (was -1.0)  
PRM pit 300^2:0 BR 35 80 3.3 (off) 0.15 (was 1.0) 4,300
PRM yaw 300^2:0 BR 35 80 3.3 (off),  4 (off) -0.2 (was 0.5)  
SRM pit 300^2:0 BR 40 (FM10) 80   -2.0 2,900
SRM yaw 300^2:0 BR 40 (FM10) 80   2.0  

  I also found Kiwamu's angular motion measurement during PRMI lock (elog #6320). They look different with my measurement yesterday (elog #6954).

  6965   Thu Jul 12 02:12:42 2012 yutaUpdateSUSBS 3.3 Hz motion

I tried to reduce BS 3.3 Hz motion with local damping. 3.3 Hz probably comes from the stack, but I want to reduce this because PRMI beam spot is moving in this frequency.
I tried it by putting some resonant gains to oplev servo and OSEM damping servo, but failed.

What I learned:
  1. BS OSEM input matrix diagonalization looks impressively good. Below is the spectra of oplev pitch/yaw and OSEM pos/pit/yaw/side comparing with and without damping (REF is without). You can see mechanical resonances are well separated. Also, damping servos don't look like they are adding noise at 3.3 Hz.
BSdam.png

  2. 3.3 Hz motion is not stationary. Amplitude is sometimes high, but sometimes low. Amplitude changes in few seconds. You can even see 3.3 Hz in the dataviewer, too.

  3. I set new oplev gains. I lowered them so that UGFs will be ~ 2.5 Hz. I turned ELP35 on.

C1:SUS-BS_OLPIT_GAIN = 0.2 (was 0.6)
C1:SUS-BS_OLPIT_GAIN = -0.2 (was -0.6)

  4. All OSEM sensors feel about the same amount of 3.3 Hz motion.

  5. OLPIT and OLYAW reduces if you put 3.3 Hz resonant gain to oplev servo, but it is maybe not true since they are in-loop error signals. You can't see the difference from OSEM sensors. Below is oplev pitch/yaw and OSEM pos/pit/yaw/side comparing with and without 3.3 Hz resonant gain (REF is without).
BSOLSUSresonantgain.png

  6967   Thu Jul 12 13:27:16 2012 yutaUpdateSUSmeasured OLTFs of PRMI optics' SUSPOS

I measured openloop transfer functions of PRM/BS/ITMX/ITMY SUSPOS servo.
They look great. They all have ~50 deg phase margin and damps only POS resonance.
PRMSUSPOSOLTF.pngBSSUSPOSOLTF.pngITMXSUSPOSOLTF.pngITMYSUSPOSOLTF.png

  6968   Thu Jul 12 15:25:24 2012 JenneUpdateSUSClearing test points

Somehow we got an excitation going on BS OpLevs, and even though Yuta thought he might have accidentally started it, he couldn't find where, so we couldn't stop it.

Since we don't have anything written on the wiki, I ended up calling Joe to remind me how to clear test points:

controls@allegra:~ 0$ diag -l -z
diag> tp clear * *
test point cleared
diag> awg clear 21.*
reset succeeded

The tp clear clears all test points everywhere.  The awg clear wouldn't let me do a universal clear, so I just did #21, which is the SUS model.  So if you want to kill excitations on a specific model, you must find it's DCU ID (it's in the top right corner of the GDS status screens for each model). 

  7005   Mon Jul 23 18:16:13 2012 JamieUpdateSUSDQ block added to sus_single_control library parts

I have added a DQ block to the sus_single_control library part.  This means that all sus models will automatically generate DQ channels based on what is specified in this doc block:

#DAQ Channels

SUSPOS_IN1
SUSPIT_IN1
SUSYAW_IN1
SUSSIDE_IN1
ULSEN_OUT
URSEN_OUT
LRSEN_OUT
LLSEN_OUT
SDSEN_OUT
OLPIT_IN1
OLYAW_IN1
OLSUM_IN1

So for instance, for BS will have the following DQ channels:

C1:SUS-BS_SUSPOS_IN1_DQ
C1:SUS-BS_SUSPIT_IN1_DQ
...

etc.  The channels names modified by the activateDQ.py script after install are still modified appropriately.

This is now the place where we should be maintaining DQ channels.

  7071   Wed Aug 1 16:38:46 2012 steveUpdateSUSspare SRMU 03 optic moved

SOS optics prepared to be hanged are moved from the South Flow Bench to S15 Clean Cabinet.

SRMU 03 (1-25-2010) specification summery E080460-05-D,  older vintage SRM 01 and PRM 02 (need more specification)

There was one  NOT MARKED SOS with two broken magnets on its face. This is labeled ???

 

This was done to prepare clean space for TIP-TILT drive- test set up.

The existing cable from 1X5 can reach only to the south end:  from whitening filter to satelite amp.  This will be good for future test of suspensions.

We need to make new cable from 1 X 1 to the south end = 40m long

Attachment 1: IMG_1464.JPG
IMG_1464.JPG
Attachment 2: IMG_1465.JPG
IMG_1465.JPG
Attachment 3: IMG_1466.JPG
IMG_1466.JPG
  7072   Wed Aug 1 17:04:22 2012 JenneUpdateSUSspare SRMU 03 optic moved

Quote:

There was one  NOT MARKED SOS with two broken magnets on its face. This is labeled ???

 While I'm not sure what specific optic this is, I think it's an older optic.  (a) All of the new optics we got from Ramin were enscribed with their #.  (b) This optic appears to have a short arrow scribe line (about the length of the guiderod), and then no scribe line (that I could see through the glass dish) on the other side.  The new optics all have a long arrow scribe line, ~1/2 the full width of the optic, and have clear scribe lines on the opposite side.

  7087   Mon Aug 6 07:59:33 2012 steveUpdateSUSPRM oplevs servo is still bad

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Yuta claims he fixed the PRM oplev by centering it the other day, but no one has left it on and watched it for a long while, to make sure it's okay.  We watched it now for ~2 min, and it was good, but we're leaving the oplevs off anyway for the night.  Tomorrow we should restore PRM (it's currently restored), turn on the oplevs, and let it sit to make sure it doesn't go crazy.

 

 PRM oplev servo was turned on with PITgain 0.5  and YAWgain  -0.7

Note: gain settings were PIT  1.0  and  YAW --0.5   on Jun 1, 2012 that I measured Feb 23, 2012

 It is still oscillating. Gains turned down to zero.

 Earthquake test our suspensions            PRM damping restored.             Oplev servo gains turned to zero.

Attachment 1: PRMeq.png
PRMeq.png
  7091   Mon Aug 6 16:48:43 2012 steveUpdateSUSSRM oplev is clipping

The SRM oplev beam is clipping.

  7098   Mon Aug 6 23:05:22 2012 JenneUpdateSUSPRM oplevs servo is fine

The PRM was pointing totally the wrong way, so there was no light on the oplev PD.  I restored the PRM, turned the gains back to (0.15, -0.3) as per Yuta's elog 6952, and it seems just fine to me.

I want to check the data from last night / the weekend to see when the mispointing happened, but dataviewer can't connect to the fb, since Jamie is still working his magic.  I'm pretty sure I restored all of the optics after Eric finished playing with MICH Friday night, but it's possible that I forgot one, I suppose.  If it wasn't me, then I'm curious when it happened.

  7106   Tue Aug 7 16:11:23 2012 steveUpdateSUSoptical table box wall proposal

 Sanwiched wall as shown: 1" clear acrylic, 2 layers of 0.004" thick "window tint", 1 layer of  0.007" thermashield and  0.125" yellow acrylic

Visibility: 70 %,    Transmission of 1064 nm  2-3 % at 0-50 degrees incident  power density 0.7 W/mm2

Max power 100 mW

        

Attachment 1: IMG_1479.JPG
IMG_1479.JPG
Attachment 2: IMG_1478.JPG
IMG_1478.JPG
  7107   Tue Aug 7 16:21:16 2012 ranaUpdateSUSoptical table box wall proposal

Quote:

 Sanwiched wall as shown: 1" clear acrylic, 2 layers of 0.004" thick "window tint", 1 layer of  0.007" thermashield and  0.125" yellow acrylic

Visibility: 70 %,    Transmission of 1064 nm  2-3 % at 0-50 degrees incident  power density 0.7 W/mm2

Max power 100 mW        

 Good. The power density and max power are not important (especially since you don't define a quantitative way to spec them). We ONLY care about the transmission.

  7167   Mon Aug 13 23:06:08 2012 JenneUpdateSUSSimplant left on

Simplant for ETMX was left on, so I didn't have control of ETMX.  Not cool.  The IFO should be left in it's 'regular' state (all optics restored to saved alignments, no simplant, LSC/ALS/ASS loops off) if you're not actively working on it.

What this did point out, however, is that we need a big ol' indicator on the IFO_ALIGN / LSC / Watchdog / Overview screens to indicate that simplant is on for a particular optic, or whatever simplant might be controlling that takes away 'regular' control.  I probably would have continued being frustrated and confused for a lot longer if Eric didn't mention that simplant could have been left on.  Thanks Eric!

Symptoms, which perhaps would have eventually pointed me to simplant, were that there was some weird moving beam on the AS camera that was flashing fabry-perot fringes, and the POX signal looked like junk. After some looking around, I noticed that ETMX, while it claimed to have all the damping loops on, and the oplev on, was swinging a lot (rms levels of 4 - 7, rather than the usual < 2 ).  I said something out loud, and Eric suggested looking at Simplant.  After putting Simplant back to Reality, things are back to normal.

 

 

  7233   Mon Aug 20 11:36:44 2012 SteveUpdateSUSETMX is not happy

ETMX has some periodic oscillation. It's damping was found tripped this morning. 

  7235   Mon Aug 20 13:10:31 2012 jamie, jenneUpdateSUSETMX is not happy

Quote:

ETMX has some periodic oscillation. It's damping was found tripped this morning. 

We tracked this down to the power normalization stuff that Yoichi added over the weekend.

With a non-zero normalization factor, and a small TRX transmission, the input the XARM controller gets really big.  When XARM is then triggered, a huge impulse is sent into the SUS_ETMX_LSC input, which causes the Vio2 filter in FM0 to ring like crazy.  This probably also explains why Yoichi was seeing trouble locking the arm when the normalization is on

The solution, as Yoichi also mentions, is probably to trigger the normalization like we trigger the rest of the boost filters.

  7242   Tue Aug 21 09:14:01 2012 SteveUpdateSUSoplevs centered

Oplevs centered in flashing condition, except PRM and SRM.  IP POS centered also,

I like this new summing screen of Jenne.

Attachment 1: OPLcentered.png
OPLcentered.png
  7282   Mon Aug 27 09:24:17 2012 SteveUpdateSUSEQ damage

  It looks like we may lost 1 (or 3 )  magnets? Do not panic, it's not for sure

 

Attachment 1: eqDamage.png
eqDamage.png
  7283   Mon Aug 27 10:49:03 2012 KojiUpdateSUSEQ damage

After shaking ITMX by the alignment bias in yaw, it came back.

As ETMX seems to be largely misaligned yaw (and did not come back with the alignment impact),
the condition of the magnets are not clear. Only the side OSEM is responding nicely.

Quote:

  It looks like we may lost 1 (or 3 )  magnets? Do not panic, it's not for sure

 

  7286   Mon Aug 27 15:49:46 2012 JenneUpdateSUSEQ damage

Quote:

After shaking ITMX by the alignment bias in yaw, it came back.

As ETMX seems to be largely misaligned yaw (and did not come back with the alignment impact),
the condition of the magnets are not clear. Only the side OSEM is responding nicely.

Quote:

  It looks like we may lost 1 (or 3 )  magnets? Do not panic, it's not for sure

 

I tried to take some photos through the window of ETMX's chamber, to see if I could see any magnets.  What we have learned is that Jenne is still not the world's best photographer.  I was holding the camera at ~max zoom inside the beam tube between the table and the window, so that's my excuse for the photos being fuzzy.  The only thing that I can really conclude is that the magnets look like they are still there, but Jamie thinks they may be stuck on the PDs/LEDs (now looking at the photos myself, I agree, especially with UL and LR). 

It looks like the best thing to do at this point, since Koji already tried jerking ETMX around in yaw a little bit, is just wait and open the door, to see what's going on in there.  I posted the photos on Picasa:

https://picasaweb.google.com/foteee/ETMX_MaybeStuck_ThroughWindow_27Aug2012

I propose that, if the magnets are broken, we pull the ETM out of the camber and fix it up in the cleanroom while we pump back down.  This would restrict us from doing any Xarm work, but will force me to focus on DRMI, and we can put the ETM back when we vent to install the tip tilts.

  7309   Wed Aug 29 17:09:57 2012 jamieUpdateSUSETMX OK, free swinging

ETMX appears to be fine.  It was stuck to its OSEMs in the usual way.  I touched it and it dislodged and is now swinging freely.  Damping loops have been re-engaged.

Screenshot.png

  7316   Thu Aug 30 08:37:11 2012 SteveUpdateSUSETMX and ITMX needs more attention

Quote:

ETMX appears to be fine.  It was stuck to its OSEMs in the usual way.  I touched it and it dislodged and is now swinging freely.  Damping loops have been re-engaged.

Screenshot.png

Earthquake m4.1 test for ETMX and moves ITMX.  ITMX-LR sensor 0.3V

Attachment 1: after4.1mAtm.png
after4.1mAtm.png
Attachment 2: eq4.1mAtm.png
eq4.1mAtm.png
  7322   Thu Aug 30 20:20:52 2012 JenneUpdateSUSWatek camera placed on SE viewport of ITMX to look at PRM

[EricQ, Jenne]

We placed the Watek camera on the SE viewport of the ITMX chamber, and focused it on the face of PRM.  We are not able to see any scattered light transmitted through the PRM, so this camera was an ineffective way to try to check spot centering on the PRM.  Jamie placed one of the new targets on the PRM cage - see his elog for details.

To get more use of the camera, we need to mount it on something, at the 5.5 inch beam height, and then cover that something with clean foil so we can place the camera on the table, in the beamline in various places.  We also need to carefully wrap the cables in foil so the don't dirty anything inside.

  7324   Thu Aug 30 20:35:09 2012 jamieUpdateSUStarget installed on PRM, temporary earthquake stops in place

We installed beam targets on PRM and BS suspension cages.

On both suspensions one of the screw holes for the target actually houses the set screw for the side OSEM.  This means that the screw on one side of the target only goes in partial way.

The target installed on BS is wrong!  It has a center hole, instead of two 45 deg holes.  I forgot to remove it, but it will obvious it's wrong to the next person who tries to use it.  I believe we're supposed to have a correct target for BS, Steve?

The earthquake stop screws on PRM were too short and were preventing installation of the PRM target.  Therefore, in order to install the target on PRM I had to replace the earthquake stops with ones Jenne and I found in the bake lab clean room that were longer, but have little springs instead of viton inserts at the ends.  This is ok for now, but

WE NEED TO REMEMBER TO REPLACE EARTHQUAKE STOPS ON PRM WHEN WE CLOSE UP.

We checked the beam through PRM and it's a little high to the right (as viewed from behind).  Tomorrow we're going to open ITMX chamber so that we can get a closer look at the spot on PR2.

  7325   Fri Aug 31 07:32:49 2012 SteveUpdateSUStarget for BS

Quote:

We installed beam targets on PRM and BS suspension cages.

On both suspensions one of the screw holes for the target actually houses the set screw for the side OSEM.  This means that the screw on one side of the target only goes in partial way.

The target installed on BS is wrong!  It has a center hole, instead of two 45 deg holes.  I forgot to remove it, but it will obvious it's wrong to the next person who tries to use it.  I believe we're supposed to have a correct target for BS, Steve?

The earthquake stop screws on PRM were too short and were preventing installation of the PRM target.  Therefore, in order to install the target on PRM I had to replace the earthquake stops with ones Jenne and I found in the bake lab clean room that were longer, but have little springs instead of viton inserts at the ends.  This is ok for now, but

WE NEED TO REMEMBER TO REPLACE EARTHQUAKE STOPS ON PRM WHEN WE CLOSE UP.

We checked the beam through PRM and it's a little high to the right (as viewed from behind).  Tomorrow we're going to open ITMX chamber so that we can get a closer look at the spot on PR2.

 The two eye  target for  the BS is in the clean tool box. It actually has irises.

  7331   Fri Aug 31 17:50:41 2012 SteveUpdateSUSSOS centering target

The SOS centering target is 1.9 mm lower than it should be! 

The hole is 10mm for the  ~6 mm beam

 

 

 

  7333   Tue Sep 4 10:29:41 2012 SteveUpdateSUSPRM damping restored
  7350   Thu Sep 6 16:46:44 2012 JenneUpdateSUSBS aligned, target removed

Q and I aligned the BS such that we were hitting the center of ETMX. The ETMX cage does not have OSEM setscrew holes on the front, so it is not possible to put the targets that Steve made on this optic.  So, I put the freestanding ruler in front of the optic, with the edge of the ruler at the center (as viewed from above) of the optic.  Then Eric steered the BS until we were hitting the 5.5" mark, and roughly half of the beam was obscured by the ruler.

We then aligned ITMX such that the prompt reflection was colinear with the incoming beam. 

I checked the 2 spots through the BS, heading to the AS port.  (2 spots since MICH hasn't been locked / finely aligned yet).  They were being clipped on the 2nd output PZT.  I adjusted the knobs of the first output PZT to center the spots on the 2nd PZT.  Note that the output PZTs' power is still off, and has been off for some unknown length of time.  I had found them off when prepping for the vent a week or two ago.  So the current alignment depends on them staying off.  We don't really need them on until we're ready to employ our OMC.

The beams now look nicely unclipped on the AS camera, and we're aligning MICH.

  7379   Thu Sep 13 17:19:45 2012 JenneUpdateSUSMirrors being installed on active TTs

I have given Den 4 G&H R>99.99% mirrors to be installed on the 4 active tip tilts.  He's in there working on things (incl. installing and balancing the pitch of the mirrors) right now.  He'll elog his work later.

ELOG V3.1.3-