I test drove ETMY biases.
PITCH worked well in slow and fast modes. Slow drive was from the IFO alignment screen C1:SUS-ETMY_PIT_COM and
the fast one from C1:SUS-ETMY_ASCPIT_OFFSET
YAW did not. It was always diagonal. It was specially bad with the fast drive. I compared them with ETMX. ETMX yaw is diagonal a little bit too.
The OPLEV return spots on the qpd ETMX and ETMY are big 5-6 mm diameter. The ETMY spot has weird geometry to qpd.
Given this new setup, we realized that the previous tolerance analysis is incorrect. Because the uncertainty in the capacitance value
does not affect the common mode rejection, as two paths share the same capacitor. Now only the imbalance of two resistors is relevant.
The error propagation formula goes as follows:
We require that the common-mode rejection error at low frequency up to 8kHz, namely
with , one can easily find out that the corner frequency needs to be around 24kHz.
1. I have used the PMC trans beam in my set-up as the required PSL beam.
2. I have superposed the ETMX-Fibre output with the PSL beam on the PSL table.
3. I have used suitable beam splitters and lens to match the power and the sizes of the overlapping beams and have aligned them to the optimum.
4. A lens having f=7.6 cms is used to focus the beam into the PD.
5. Initially, I used the broadband 1611 NewFocus PD to find the IR beat signal by scanning the oven temperature. (using the digital sitemap controls.)
6. I checked the previous elog entries by Suresh and Koji on the green beat signal they had worked on and used their data to get an idea of the temperature range of the oven where I could obtain a beat.
7. I obtained peaks at three different temperatures as had been noted previously and set the temperature so that I am now sitting in the middle stable regime.
8. Then I switched to the 1811 100 MHz PD as it has a larger gain. It has a saturation power of 100 microWatts. The input power at the PD is measured to be 80 microWatts.
9. I was having trouble getting a clean peak due to presence of many harmonics as seen on the spectrum analyser. This happened because there was too much power incident on the PD which led to arising of non-linearity giving rise to harmonics.
10.To reduce the power entering the PD, I put in a ND 1.0 Filter just before the beam enters the PD and obtained a clean signal.
11. I will use the frequency counter tomorrow to check the resonant frequency and try to connect the output to acquire a digital signal.
12. Otherwise I will proceed to build a Mixer Frequency Discriminator.
13. After the feed-back loop is completed, I will proceed to compare the frequency-noises of the green-beat lock and the IR-beat lock.
Through some locking exercise I found that several things are degrading.
Remember the interferometer is like a cat, so we have to feed and take care of her everyday. (Otherwise the cat will be dead !)
Locking of the Arms :
Locking of PRM :
I had to realign PSL beam into the MC in order to reobtain the MC lock. We lost lock at sometime around 8:30 AM on Tuesday. See attached trend data for MC_RFPD_DCMON.
The is the second time this week that I had to do this when we were unable to obtain the MC lock. On both occassions the zig-zag at the end of the PSL table was tweaked to minimise the MC_RFPD_DCMON.
We have been using the MC as a Beam Axis Reference. And therefore we are adjusting the PSL beam to maximise coupling into MC. However if MC's beam axis has shifted, then would it not be best to use the pzt's to re-obtain coupling into the arm cavities?
This is part of the WFS activity. So far I have completed the following tasks:
1) I fixed the MEDM screens up to a point where they can be used for locking. There are still some buttons which invoke non-existing screens and some blank fields. But the basic filter banks and input and output matrices are fixed.
2) I copied all the old filter banks into the new screens both in the WFS head and in the WFS Master, where the servo filters are located. The I and Q filter banks in the WFS heads have been switched on.
3) I <=> Q phase settings in the WFS head for each quadrant: We have assumed that the I and Q are orthogonal so D=90 for all cases. I set the R phase to minimise the signal in all the Q lines. So the signal is largely in the I phase. I used Sine Response feature in DTT while supplying an excitation signal to MC2_ASCPIT_EXC. At times I used the YAW instead of PIT if I did not get enough coherence. This was set manually by watching the Q phase signal and minimising that by adjusting the R angle. It was in general possible to get this correct to a deg. There are several old scripts to do this in the MC/WFS but they do not work since most of them are based on the ezlockin or ezcademod functions. I will try to fix the ezWFS1phase and ezWFS2phase scripts to automate this. Some channel names have to be changed in these.
4) I measured the transfer function between the mirror motions [(MC1, MC2, MC3) x (PIT, YAW)] and the sensor DoF [(WFS1, WFS2) x (PIT, YAW)]. The measurements are reported below. The plan is to invert this matrix and use it as the Out_Matrix.
I list here the various steps I took in making this measurement.
a) Set the DC offsets on the individual quadrants to zero using an old script (which I updated with the new channel names). The script is called McWFS_dc_offsets and is located in the $scripts$/MC/WFS directory. Note that before doing this the PSL shutter was closed. This script sets a basic EPICS parameter called AOFF for each channel. These are listed in cvs/cds/caltech/target/c1iool0 .
b) Then the PSL beam into the MC was steered to optimise coupling into MC (described in my earlier post today). This is because we use the input beam as a reference while setting up the WFS.
c) Unlock the MC and center the directly reflected beam from the MC on the WFS. We use the DC monitors on the C1IOO_WFS_QPD.adl screen to center the spot on the WFS head.
d) Then used the WFSoffsets script to set the offsets in the I and Q filter banks to zero. This script uses the ezcaservo to look at the OUT16 channels and zeroes them by setting an appropriate offset. I took care to switch off all slow filters in the I and Q filter banks before this operation was carried out . Only the 60Hz comb filter was on.
e) Opened the PSL shutter and relocked the MC
f) Then I measured the transfer co-efs by oscillating the optic (exciting a specific degree of freedom) and observing the response in the WFS sensor degrees of freedom. These are tabulated above.
I plan to use this matrix and prepare the Output matix and then close the WFS servo loops.
80 days: PMC is drifting
Since last week, I've been working on building the photosensor head and have been making adjustments to my photosensor circuit box.
Changes to photosensor circuit (for box):
1) Last week, I was reading in the two signals from the two heads through a single input. Now there are two separate inputs for the two separate photosensors
2)During one of my many voltage regulator replacements, I apparently used a 7915 voltage regulator instead of a 7805 (thanks, Koji, for pointing that out! I never would have caught that mistake X___X)
3)I was powering my 5V voltage regulator with 10V...Now I'm using 15 V (now I only need 1 power supply and 3 voltage input plugs)
I have also began assembling my first photosensor head. Here is what I have so far:
Here is what needs to be done still for the photosensor head
I need to find four Teflon washers and nuts to rigidly attach the isolated PCB (PCB, Teflon sheet combination) to the box. I already have the plastic screws in (I want to use plastic and Teflon for electrical isolation purposes, so as to not short my circuit).
I need to attach the sheath of my signal cable to the box of the photosensor head for noise reduction (plan: drill screw into photosensor head box to wrap sheath wires around)
I need to attach the D-sub to the other end of my signal cable so that it can connect to the circuit box. So far, I only have the D-sub to connect the cable to my photosensor head
Yesterday, Suresh helped to walk me through the photosensor box circuit so that I now understand what voltages to expect for my circuit box trouble-shooting. After this lesson, we figured out that the problem with my photosensor box was that the two op-amps were saturated (so I fixed the feedback!). After replacing the resistor, I got the LED to light up! I still had problems reading the voltage signals from the photodiodes. I was reading 13.5V from the op amp output, but Koji explained to me that this meant that I was too close to saturation (the photodiodes were perhaps producing too much photocurrent, bringing the output close to saturation). I switched the 150 K resistor in the feedback loop to a 3.4K resistor and have thus successfully gotten displacement-dependent voltage outputs (i.e. the voltage output fluctuates as I move my hand closer and farther from the photosensor head).
Now that I have a successful circuit to power and read outputs from one photosensor, I can begin working on the other half of the circuit to power the other photosensor!
We kept reading about digital filtering
We tested the seismometer last friday
Jan came and tested again the seismometer last monday
We wrote a simulation of the stacks transfer functions, and of the distance between the mirrors.
The vent will start from 1 st of August ! !
We have cleaned, baked, rga scaned traps for vacuum. Thorlabs LB1 on 1" OD ss posts and forks. The effective surface area is 43 x 18 mm of stacked razors.
Seven pieces are mounted on New Focus #9962 1" OD SS vented- pedestrals to 5.5" center height and 5 pieces to 4.875"
The vent will start from 1 st of August !
++++ Task List for the vent preparation ++++
+ Preparation of beam dumps (Jamie / Steve)
+ Health check of shadow sensor and measurement of the cross-coupling (Steve)
+ Measurement of the arm Lengths and estimation of the required precision (Kiwamu)
+ Alignment of the Y green beam (Suresh)
+ Alignment of the incident beam axis (Jenne)
+ Measurement of the MC spot positions (Suresh)
+ Loss measurement of the arm cavities (Kiwamu / volunteers)
++++ Task List for the post-vent activity ++++
+ 3f RFPDs (Koji / Rana)
+ EOM resonant circuit (Kiwamu)
+ Sophistication of the LSC model (Yoichi)
+ DRMI commissioning (Keiko / Anamaria)
Not exactly sure what the problem was, but I updated to the head of the SVN and rebuilt and it seems to be working fine now.
Our surf student Manuel Marchiò received 40m specific safety training today.
Because I'm too lazy to write a cohenrent elog right now, here's my notes that I wrote while working tonight:
Elog notes, 27July2011
Aligned Xarm, just to check on it. Had to flip sign of TRX in DCPD filter bank (to gain of -1) to make the signal positive.
Restored Yarm, see some slight flashing, but no lock yet.
Adjusted phase rotation of AS55 from 56.5deg to 60deg, just by-eye trying to maximize AS55I, my arm error signal. AS55I goes from ~ -40 to +60 counts
Tried fitzing with Yarm gain, flipping sign, incr gain. No real change in signals, or flashing.
Incr. ETMY oplev gains to -0.4 from -0.2
Engaged ELP35's on Pit and Yaw, to be more similar to other optics. However, right now all of the optics have different things in their filter banks. Why??
Arm is flashing pretty reliably now, but still not locking. The trigger threshold is always satisfied, so that's not it.
Initially I was using RFPD-1611to get the IR beat frequency. Its gain was not very high, so I was getting a very low signal of power -37 dBm.
I used ZHL-32A-S with a gain of 25 dBm to amplify it before feeding it into the spectrum analyser.
I connected the ground of the amplifier circuit to the red of the power supply, which blew the amplifier.
I learnt that there is a small tab indicating the ground side of the BNC to banana connectors which I should have noticed.
I learnt to plug in the side with th little tab on it into the ground of the power supply. (Learnt it the hard way I guess!!)
A new offset-zeroing script has been developed and it is ready to run.
The motivation is to replace the old zeroing script called offset by a better one because this old script somehow failed to revert the gain settings on a given filter bank.
The new script, named offset2, does the same job, but uses tdsavg instead of using ezcaservo. So it doesn't screw up the gain settings.
Additionally the structure of the script is much simpler than the old offset script, and fewer ezca-functions.
I will modify some scripts which use the old offset script so that all the offset-zeroing is done by offset2.
Useful scripts are listed on the 40m wiki
[Nicole / Jamie / Rana / Kiwamu]
The X arm and Y arm have been locked.
The settings for the locking were stored on the usual IFO_CONFIGURE scripts, so anybody can lock the arms.
In addition to that Nicole, Jamie and Rana re-centered the beam spot on the ETMY_TRANS camera and the TRY PD.
The next step is to activate the C1ASS servo and align the both arms and beam axis.
Xarm locking notes:
* Changed TRX gain from -1 to -0.02. Without this 50x reduction the arm power was not normalized.
* Had to fix trigger matrix to use TRX for XARM and TRY for YARM. Before it was crazy and senseless.
* Lots of PZT alignment. It was off by lots.
* Yarm trans beam was clipping on the steering mirrors. Re-aligned. Needs to be iterated again. Be careful when bumping around the ETMY table.
* YARM gain was set to -2 instead of -0.2. Because the gain was too high the alignment didn't work right.
ALWAYS HAVE an OPEN DATAVIEWER with the standard ARM channels going when doing ANY INTERFEROMETER WORK.
THIS IS THE LAW.
OSEM damping gains were adjusted by observing real time dataviewer to get Q of 5
OSEMs were kicked up one by one with 200 counts ~1sec. The error signal was optimized to get 1/2 of exitation amplitude at the 5th sinusoid wave.
C1: SUS-ITMX_SUSPOS_N1 gain 111 -> 65, PIT 7.2 -> 8, YAW 12 -> 6, SIDE 280
ITMY 277 -> 120, 19.2 -> 7, 24 -> 19, 420 -> 470
ETMY 10 -> 32, 20 -> 3, 20 -> 10, 50
ETMX 22 -> 25, 3, 3, -170
ETMX having problems: 1, YAW can not be excited
2, SIDE has no error signal in dataviewer. Sensing voltage on MEDM screen 0.142V
Here is the calibration curve (displacement versus voltage output) for the photosensor head that I made with the S5971 photodiodes and L9337 LEDs. This was made using a regular mirror. The linear region appears to be between 0.4 and 0.75cm. I will need to arrange the photosensor head so it measures displacements in the linear region of this plot. This plot was made using a 287 ohm resistor.
Kiwamu and I aligned the PMC transmitted beam the incident beam going to PMC today.
I learnt how to lock the PMC using the digital controls.
pianosa:gpib 0> ./readSR785.csh rb2
netgpibdata.py: Command not found.
The 'Bacardi' STS-2 seismometer was tested with the "purple" breakout box and it was found out that all the three axes gave a voltage of 11 V (as shown on the screen of the oscilloscope) before pressing the auto-zero button and after pressing it the voltage shown was 6 V. We tried again the blue box and it was working perfectly after pushing the auto zero button (the auto zero took a few seconds). The power of the purple box is still on, we will wait a few hours, to see if something changes.
c1iscex was behaving very strangely this morning. Steve earlier reported that he was having trouble pulling up some channels from the c1scx model. I went to investigate and noticed that indeed some channels were not responding.
While I was in the middle of poking around, c1iscex stopped responding altogether, and became completely unresponsive. I walked down there and did a hard reset. Once it rebooted, and I did a burt restore from early this morning, everything appeared to be working again.
The fact that problems were showing up before the machine crashed worries me. I'll try to investigate more this afternoon.
Jamei fixed the computer. Now I had a healthier ETMX with SIDE signal that allowed me to set gains to get Q of 5
The Y arm restore locked the arm at TRY -out 2.4V, the X arm still did not lock or align to lock. It has some fringes.
ETMX POS gain 22 -> 17, PIT 3 -> 1, YAW 3, SIDE -170 -> -110
PRM 50 -> 30, 1, 2, 50
SRM 55 -> 20, 2.4 -> 1.5, 4.8 -> 2, 140 -> 100
Now all SUS OSEM gains are set
Last night I aligned the incident beam axis and the Yarm by touching the PZT mirrors and the suspensions.
I didn't estimate how good they were aligned, but I guess the Y arm is now ready for the Y green light.
Next : Y green alignment and the MC spots measurement / alignment.
++ Motivation ++
Prior to the coming vent we want to have the Y arm, incident beam axis and Y green light aligned so that we can align some necessary optics in the chamber.
Also alignment of the incident beam will allow us to re-position the incident beam alignment monitor (i.e. IPPOS and IPANG).
Our plan was to first align the Y arm using the ASS system and then align the Y green light to the Y arm.
++ what I failed ++
First I was trying to measure the spot positions on the MC mirrors to make me sure the beam axis has/hasn't changed.
Also I was going to align the MC suspensions to have nice spot position on each suspension using the MCASS system
because this will help us checking the beam clearance in the Faraday and perhaps re-positioning of the Faraday during the coming vent.
But essentially I failed and eventually gave up because MCASS didn't work. It seems that MCASS needs some modifications in the scripts.
Then, to make me feel better I moved on to the Y arm and beam axis alignment.
++ what I did ++
I tried using C1ASS to align the incident beam and suspensions on the Y arm, but it didn't work.
However the drive signals from ASS and its demodulated signals looked fine. Only the feedback did not work correctly.
Every time I enabled the feedback paths, the arm just lost the lock. Something is wrong in the feedback paths.
Then I started to align the cavity by my hands while looking at the demodulated signal from each LOCKIN module.
I aligned the things until each demodulated signal fluctuates around zero.
At the end the beam spots on the ETMY and ITMY camera looked well-aligned and the transmitted light became larger by a factor of 2ish.
[Manuel, Ishwita, Jenne, Jamie]
We changed the C1PEM model and the names of the C1:PEM channels.
We reinstalled the blue breakout box, since the purple one still didn't work.
So, now the AA board channels are connected as follows...
C1 = C1:PEM-SEIS_GUR1_X
C2 = C1:PEM-SEIS_GUR1_Y
C3 = C1:PEM-SEIS_GUR1_Z
C4 = C1:PEM-SEIS_GUR2_X
C5 = C1:PEM-SEIS_GUR2_Y
C6 = C1:PEM-SEIS_GUR2_Z
C7 = C1:PEM-SEIS_STS_1_X
C8 = C1:PEM-SEIS_STS_1_Y
C9 = C1:PEM-SEIS_STS_1_Z
C11 = C1:PEM-SEIS_STS_2_X
C12 = C1:PEM-SEIS_STS_2_Y
C13 = C1:PEM-SEIS_STS_2_Z
C14 = C1:PEM-SEIS_STS_3_X
C15 = C1:PEM-SEIS_STS_3_Y
C16 = C1:PEM-SEIS_STS_3_Z
C17 = C1:PEM-ACC_MC1_X
C18 = C1:PEM-ACC_MC1_Y
C19 = C1:PEM-ACC_MC1_Z
C20 = C1:PEM-ACC_MC2_X
C21 = C1:PEM-ACC_MC2_Y
C22 = C1:PEM-ACC_MC2_Z
Although the channels for all 3 STS-2 seismometers are made but only one is installed. So only Channels C1 to C9 are now in operation...
We checked the data from the plugged channels with the Dataviewer. We could see the peak whenever someone jumped in the lab. Even Kiwamu jumped and saw his signal.
I found that the ref cav trans CCD view was blinking with 30-50 fringe amplitudes. This meant the laser freq was swinging ~50GHz.
I checked the ABSL laser and the SG out of a lock-in amplifier was connected to the slow input.
This was shaking the laser temp from 29degC to 46degC. This was the cause of the fringe swinging.
This big excitation changing the output power too as the temp was changed across it mode-hop region.
I have disconnected the excitation from the laser no matter how useful experiments were took place as there was no e-log entry about this.
I need the explanations
1. Why our precious laser is exposed to such a large swing of temperature?
2. Why the excitation is left like that without any attendance?
3. Why there was no elogging about this activity?
Hmm. Should have only been +/- 1 GHz. Some setting got changed apparently...
This is a part of the RefCav temperature measurement setup. You'll get an elog from Jenny very soon.
The optics on the Y-end table which required to be moved have been repositioned. Please see the attached pic for details.
The green beam is not yet aligned to the cavity. That is my next task.
The servos of C1ASS for the Y arm and the beam axis alignments were fixed.
Now we can correctly run the Y arm ASS from the C1IFO_CONFIGURE window as usual.
The sign of some control gains had been flipped for some reasons, so I changed them to the correct signs.
Next : Health-check for the X arm ASS, the loss measurements.
Since we will measure (and hopefully adjust) the spot positions on the MC suspensions prior to the vent, MCASS is necessary for it.
Here is the MCASS status so far:
+ Valera worked on MCASS on the last February, and basically no progress after he left.
+ The MCASS model had been completed in C1IOO.mdl.
+ He made some useful scripts, including mcassup, mcassOn/Off, senseMCdecenter, senseMCmirrro and senseMCdofs.
Summary of those scripts can be found in his entry #4355.
+ We haven't closed the MCASS loops.
+ The control filters are still blank.
+ We haven't put any elements on the input and output matrices.
+ Some parameters for the dithering oscillators and demodulation systems were properly set.
So we can get the demodulated signals by simply running mcassUp and mcassOn. (This essentially corresponds to the A2L measurement.)
+ The PIT motions are driven at 10, 11 and 12 Hz for MC1, 2 and 3 respectively. For YAW, the frequencies were chosen to be 11.5, 12.5 and 13.5 Hz.
+ Some medm windows were prepared but not as refined as that of ASS.
+ Valera performed a measurement of the spot positions by using MCASS. The results are summarized in #4660.
+ We made an estimation about the beam clearance on the Faraday based on the measured spot positions (#4674)
So, it seems we should be able to at least measure the spot positions soon by using his scripts.
I've been working on the PSL table to put together a setup so that I can measure the reference cavity's response to a temperature step increase at the can surrounding it. My first step was to mode match the beam coming from the AP table to the cavity.
I implemented my mode matching solution. I ended up using a different one from the one I last elogged about. Here is the solution I used:
Two lenses: f = 1016.7.6 mm at -0.96 m and f = 687.5 mm at -0.658 m. (I set my origin at the polarizing beam splitter--the spot where I want my beam to match the beam coming from the PMC, so all waists are behind that point). Below is what it should look like.
What I did on the table:
Here's a picture of the PSL table with the lenses and mirror I added. The beam is redirected by a mirror and then a polarizing beam splitter. Past the beam splitter is another lens (f=286.5 mm), which was already in place from the mode matching of the beam from the PMC to the reference cavity.
Here is a block diagram of my intended experimental setup:
I am going to try to lock the laser to the cavity given my preliminary mode matching and then go back and improve it later. My next step is to find a frequency range for dithering the voltage sent to the PZT. To do this I will:
I ended up having to switch to a different mode-matching solution, because I was unable to find the f = 572.7 mm lens. See my next elog entry (5069).
The PSL temperature box has returned to service, with some circuit modifications. The 1k resistors on all the temp. sensor inputs (R3, R4, R7, R8, R12, R12) were changed to 0 Ohm. Also, the 10k resistors R26, R28, R29, and R30 were changed to 10.2k metal film. The DCC document will be updated shortly. There is now an offset in the MINCOMEAS channel compared to the others, which will be corrected in the morning after looking at the overnight trend.
Forgot to do this in May. Have just changed the values in the psl.db file now as well as updating them live via Probe.
To make the appropriate change, I took the measured offset (5.31 deg) and added 2x this to the EGUF and EGUL field for the MINCO_MEAS channel. (see instructions here)
Committed the .db file to the SVN.
attached plot shows 8 days of trend with 5.31 degC added to the black trace using the XMGRACE Data Set Transformations
I turned the RefCav heater and servo back on a couple days ago. At first it was stabilizing again at a low setpoint, but in reality the right temperature (~40 C). After fixing the in-loop signal offsets, the setpoint now correctly reflects the actual temperature.
Jenny is going to calibrate the sensors using some kind of dunking cannister next week.
The X arm ASS was also fixed. So both X and Y arm ASS are now back to normal.
Now we can align the arms any time from the buttons on the C1IFO_CONFIGURE window.
The reason why the servo didn't work was that the sign of some control gains had been flipped.
This was exactly the same situation as that in the Y arm ASS (#5067).
I modified the script armloss so that the channel names in the script are properly adopted to the new CDS.
Additionally I disabled the ETMX(Y)_tickle command in the script.
The tickle command puts some offsets on the LSC signal to let the arms pass through a fringe until it gets locked, but apparently we don't need it because the arms are loud enough.
A brief check showed that the script ran fine.
I will measure the loss on the X and Y arm cavity tomorrow.
I think you made a simple mistake in your diagram -- the mixer must be replaced by a summer circuit. Otherwise you cannot do the PDH lock.
Required arm length = 37.7974 +/- 0.02 [m]
This is a preliminary result of the estimation of the Arm length tolerance.
I did the measurement of the arm loss on both X and Y arm by running the armLoss script.
The results will be posted later.
Status update for the vent preparation:
The punchline is : We can not open the chamber on Monday !
##### Task List for the vent preparation #####
(not yet) Low power MC
(not yet) Measurement of the arm lengths
(not yet) Alignment of the Y green beam (#5066)
(not yet) Measurement of the MC spot positions
(80% done) Estimation of the tolerance of the arm length (#5076)
(done) Preparation of beam dumps (#5047)
(done) Health check of shadow sensors and the OSEM damping gain adjustment (#5061)
(done) Alignment of the incident beam axis (#5073)
(done) Loss measurement of the arm cavities (#5077)
I made some attempts to measure the current length of the arm cavities by using the mass-kicking technique.
However unfortunately I am running out my energy to complete the measurement,
so I will finish the measurement at some time today.
I still have to set an appropriate kick amplitude. Right now I am injecting AWG into ETMY_LSC_EXC at 0.2 Hz with amplutde of 400 cnts.
I guess it needs a little bit more amplitude to get more psuedo-constant velocity.
Volunteers are always welcome !
The procedure was well-described in entry #555 by Dr.Stochino.
Here is just an example of the time series that I took today showing how the time series looks like.
Both arms locked easely around 1V transmited. We should recenter oplevs.
wow. This Monte-Carlo matrix is one of the most advanced optical modeling things I have ever seen. We never had this for any of the interferometers before.
Kiwamu, Koji and Steve,
Arm aligned separatly and oplev qpds were centered including BS. Than we realigned manually DRM and centered their qpds.
ALL SUS oplevs were centered to resonating cavities.
SUS-ETMY_QPD is not responding. It is reading zero in dataviewer and 4,400 counts on QPD MEDM screen.......must be wrong cable connected
IP-POS is sick. Last time alive 7-19-2011
IP-ANG beam is clipping on pick-up mirror at ETMY chamber. This will have to be fixed at the vent. The qpd itself is responding to light.
The beam axis of the Y green light has been aligned.
Now I can see TEM00 mode is flashing on the ETMY camera.
-- (What I will do tonight)
The next step is to refine some electronics in the PDH loops to get the green light locked to the Y arm cavity.
If the beam isn't locked, I guess the in-vac-work will be so difficult because of the low intensity of the green light.
According to a brief check on the circuits, a low pass filter after the demodulation mixer is in a sad situation.
It doesn't pass any signals and in fact it behaves more like an absorber.
On the other hand, the modulation system looks fine to me because I was able to see the 270 kHz sideband converted into AM due to the fringing.
Summary of the week ending July 31st. Number of elog entries = 53
+ ETMY-LR sensor looked strange. Something wrong.
+ Responses from the DC alignment bias to the shadow sensors and the oplevs were checked.
--> ETMY shows the response with the opposite sign. Wired.
+ ETMY shadow sensors were examined in terms of the spectra.
--> WF, AA and ADC noise looks reasonably low and not high enough to explain the low frequency noise.
+ Adjusted all the OSEM gains
+ MICH noise budget is ongoing. WF filter needs to be greater than 21 dB to have dark noise of the PD greater than ADC noise
+ The arms became lockable
+ modified and re-ran activateDQ.py.
+ c1iscex crashed for unknown reasons and we physically rebooted it.
- ALS (Fiber experiments)
+ PMC trans is sampled for the fiber beat-note measurement on the PSL table.
+ The beat-note signal between PSL and X end laser were obtained.
+ Some optics in the ETMY table were rearragend to have the Y green light aligned.
- ACS / ASS
+ incident beam axis has changed a lot.
+ X arm and Y arm ASS were reactivated.
---> The sign of some of the control gains had been wrong.
+ The incident beam axis and X/Y arm were re-aligned
+ Some medm screens fixed.
+ Adjustment of the demodulation phase on each quadrant on WFS1 and WFS2 are done.
+ The sensing matrix (from optics to WFS sensors) were measured.
+ c1pem was modified
+ plugged a seismometers to ADC through an AA board.
--> channels are coming to the digital land
- Preparation for the invac work
+ 7 pieces of beam traps are available
+ Tolerance of the arm length is estimated to be +/- 2 cm.
+ ABSL is injected into the reference cavity. some flashing happened but no locking.
+ eddited the psl.db file to set EGUF and EGUL
+ turned RefCav heater and servo back on
Old MZ PD (InGaAs 2mm, @29.5MHz) has been modified for REFL33.
There has been no choice for the 11MHz notch other than putting it on the RF preamp
as the notch in parellel to the diode eats the RF transimpedance at 33MHz.
I wait for judgement of Rana if the notch at the MAX4107 feedback is acceptable or not.