After finally figuring out what was messed up with ETMY I was able to get good measurements of the binary whitening switching on ETMY to determine that it is in fact working now:
ul : 3.2937569959 = 10.3538310999 db
ll : 3.28988426634 = 10.3436124066 db
sd : 3.34670033732 = 10.4923365497 db
lr : 3.08727050163 = 9.7914936665 db
ur : 3.27587751842 = 10.3065531117 db
Actually, ETMY was the only good one. They should all have the 30 Hz High pass as the damping filter. I think these details are in the elog entry that we originally made while doing ETMY.
They should all also have a 3:30 in the XXSEN to compensate the whitening. The logic is supposed to be that FM1 is ON when the hardware whitening is ON. This is the opposite of the old logic and its why the damping filter has to be moved from 3 to 30 Hz.
This CSHRC mangling on Feb 4 did more than re-arrange FB binaries.
It broke the path to MEDM for the 32-bit machines in the lab (e.g. mafalda) and stopped the MEDM snapshots from being posted onto our MEDM Status Web Page.
This is because, in addition to the paths mentioned in the above elog, the paths to the EPICS directories were also commented out. I've re-inserted them into our
.cshrc file in the 32-bit section; the statScreen CRON that Yoichi set up is now back in business.
* for some reason, the 'cronjob.sh' script is wiping out its own log file. It would be great if someone who understands stderr output re-direction can fix it so that the log-file from each run is retained until the next time cron runs.
The fireworks of yesterday showing up in the lab. Pasadena out side air 6.6 million cfm for 0.3 micron particles and 1.5 million cfm for 0.5 micron size.
The PRM sus damping was restored. It's side rms motion came down from 35 to 4 mV immediately. Lab air quality is back to normal.
Here I show two photos of the latest ABSL (ABSolute Length measurement) setup.
Figure.1 : A picture of the ABSL setup on the AP table.
The setup has been a little bit modified from the before (#4923).
As I said on the entry #4923, the way of sampling the ABSL laser wasn't so good because the beam, which didn't go through the faraday, was sampled.
In this latest configuration the laser is sampled after the faraday with a 90% beam splitter.
The transmitted light from the 90% BS (written in pink) is sent to the PSL table through the access tube which connects the AP and PSL table .
FIgure.2: A picture of the ABSL setup on the PSL table.
The 10% sampled beam ( pink beam in the picture) eventually comes to the PSL table via the access tube (the hole on the left hand side of the picture).
Then the ABSL beam goes through a mode matching telescope, which consists of a combination of a concave and a convex lens.
The PSL laser (red line in the picture) is sampled from a point after the doubling crystal.
The beam is combined at a 50 % BS, which has been setup for several purposes( see for example #3759 and #4339 ) .
A fast response PD (~1 GHz) is used for the beat-note detection.
In this past weekend the ABSL laser was successfully frequency-locked to the PSL laser with a frequency offset of about 100 MHz.
In the current setup a mixer-based frequency discriminator is used for detection of the beat-note frequency.
Setup for frequency locking
The diagram below shows the setup for the frequency locking.
Based on Rana's comment I have gone through and moved all of the corner frequencies for the high pass filters in the SUS damping controllers to 30 Hz. I did this for all optics (MC1, MC1, MC3, BS, ITMX, ITMY, PRM, SRM, ETMX, ETMY) all degrees of freedom (POS, PIT, YAW, SIDE).
Rana also suggested I turn off all of the BounceRoll filters until we get a chance to tune those individually for all the suspensions.
Finally, I normalized the MC SUSXXX filter banks to look just like all the other suspensions.
All damping filter banks for all degrees of freedom for all single suspensions should all be the same now (modulo the differences in the BounceRoll filters, which are now turned off).
This is getting closer, but with the whitening left OFF and the cts2um filter also OFF, none of the suspensions are working correctly. I'm shutting down all the watchdogs until someone gets around to setting the damping gains and filters correctly.
I'm attaching a screenshot of some of the problems I see so far with MC3.
I'm going to try to get the MC suspensions working OK for tonight so that we can use them for the PRMI locking work.
Update #1: None of the MC SUS DAQ channels are found by dataviewer....SUS debugging speed reduced by 10x. Tue Jul 05 21:38:17 2011
Update #2: POS/PIT/YAW BIAS sliders now seem to work, but are ~1000x too weak to do anything. Tue Jul 05 21:41:38 2011
[Jenne / Rana/ Kiwamu]
We found the 30 Hz high pass filters had lower gain than what they used to be at low frequcnies.
So we increased the gain of the high pass filters called '30:0.0' by a factor of 10 to have the same gain as before.
Now all the suspension shows some kind of damping. Needs more optimizations, for example Q-adjustments for all the suspensions...
This is getting closer, but with the whitening left OFF and the cts2um filter also OFF, none of the suspensions are working correctly.
We found the 30 Hz high pass filters had lower gain than what they used to be at low frequcnies.
I'm not convinced that this is what you want to do, or at least I wouldn't do it this way. The "k" in the zpk filter was set such that the filter had unity gain above the high-pass cut-off frequency. For a 30 Hz high-pass the k needs to be a factor of 10 smaller than it would be for a 3 Hz high-pass to achieve this high frequency unity gain.
As it is now these HP filters have 20 dB of gain above 30 Hz. If the open loop transfer function needs to more gain I would have done that by adjusting the overall DC gain of the filter bank, not by increasing the gain in this one filter. Maybe you guys have been doing it differently, though. Or maybe I'm just completely off base.
I tried to fix all of the problems that I could identify in this screen shot:
So after talking to Kiwamu about it, I understand now that since the damping loops need all of this extra gain when the high-pass corner is moved up, it's more convenient to put that gain in the control filter itself, rather than having to crank the overall DC gain up to some inconveniently high value.
Healthy BS oplev
[Steve / Kiwamu]
Since the oplevs were the ones we haven't carefully tested, so the oplevs need to be checked.
This checking is also a part of the suspension optimizations (see the minutes of the last 40m meeting).
In this work Steve will check two things for all the oplevs :
1. Noise level including the dark noise, electrical noise and ADC noise to just make sure that the noise are blow the signal levels below ~ 30Hz.
2. The spectra of the signals to make sure there are no funny oscillations and unexpected structures
To check the things listed above, we take two kinds of oplves' spectra :
1. "dark noise" when the He-Ne beam is blocked.
2. "signals" when the optics are damped by only OSEMs
We did these checks on the BS oplev today (see the last entry).
All of them are fine, for example the dark noise (including electrical noise and ADC noise) are below the signal levels.
And no oscillation peak was found. Steve will go through all of the oplevs in this way.
[Jenne / Kiwamu]
Last night we modified the locking scripts, that were called from C1IFO_CONFIGURE.adl, to adapt them to the new "PRCL" and "SRCL" convention.
So far they work fine and quitted dumping some error messages about inexistence of these channel names.
P.S. The locking scripts have been summarized on the 40m wiki
- Now the power and signal recycling cavity lengths are named "PRCL" and "SRCL" in stead of three letter names without "L".
We should change the locking script to accomodate these changes.
Just tying up a loose end. The next day Kiwamu and I checked to see what the trouble was. We concluded that the PRM had not moved during my measurement though I had 'Misaligned' it from the medm screen. So all the power levels measured here were with the PRM aligned. The power level change was subsequently measured and e-logged
The measured change in the REFL DC power with and without PRM aligned seems unacceptably small. Something wrong ?
The difference in the power with and without PRM aligned should be more than a factor of 300.
[difference in power] = [single bounce from PRM] / [two times of transmission through PRM ]
= (1-T) / T^2 ~ 310,
where T is the transmissivity of PRM and T = 5.5% is assumed in the calculation.
Also the reflectivity of MICH is assumed to be 1 for simplicity.
We now have (with the PRM misaligned):
REFL11: Power incident = 7.60 mW ; DC out = 0.330 V => efficiency = 0.87 A/W
REFL55: Power incident = 23 mW ; DC out = 0.850 V => efficiency = 0.74 A/W
and with the PRM aligned::
REFL11: DC out = 0.35 V => 8 mW is incident
REFL55: DC out = 0.975 V => 26 mW is incident
We looked at the ADC channel assignments in the LSC model and wanted to make sure that the LSC rack wiring and the LSC model are in agreement with each other. So the plan is to wire the rack as shown below. I will also post this file on svn so that we can keep it updated in case there are changes.
The ETMY laser was operating at 1.5 A current and 197 mW power.
For the efficient frequency doubling of the AUX laser beam at the ETMY table, a higher power is required.
Steve and I changed the current level of the laser from 1.5 A to 2.1 A in steps of 0.1 A and noted the corresponding power output . The graph is attached here.
The laser has been set to current 1.8 Amperes. At this current, the power of the output beam just near the laser output is measured to be 390 mW.
The power of the beam which is being coupled into the optical fibre is measured to be between 159 mW to 164 mW (The power meter was showing fluctuating readings).
The power out of the beam coming out of the fibre far-end at the PSL table is measured to be 72 mW. Here, I have attached a picture of the beam paths of the ETMY table with the beams labelled with their respective powers.
Next we are going to adjust the green alignment on the ETMY and then measure the power of the beam.
At the output end of the fibre on the PSL, a power meter has been put to dump the beam for now as well as to help with the alignment at the ETMY table.
Yesterday I found the C1:DAQ-FB0_C1???_STATUS lights to be red for the SUS, MCS, SCX, and SCY controllers. I know this has something to do with model communication with the framebuilder, but I unfortunately don't remember exactly what it is. I decided to try restarting the affected models to see if that cleared up the problem. It did. After restarting c1scx, c1scy, c1sus, and c1mcs everything came back up green.
We need some better documentation about what all of these status indicators mean.
The LSC model has been updated:
We now take the filter state bit from the first filter bank in all RF PD I/Q filter banks (AS55_I, REFL11_Q, etc) as the controls for the binary analog whitening switching on the RF PD I/Q inputs. The RF_PD part was also modified to output this control bit. The bits from the individual PDs are then combined into the various words that are written to the Contec BO part.
Yesterday Suresh posted an updated LSC wiring diagram, with correct channel assignments for the RF PD I/Q and DC inputs. Upon inspection of the physical hardware we found that some of LSC the wiring was incorrect, with I/Q channels swapped, and some of the PDs in the wrong channels. We went through and fixed the physical wiring to reflect the diagram. This almost certainly will affect the EPICS settings for some of the input channels, such as offsets and RD rotations. We should therefore go through all of the RF inputs and make sure everything is kosher.
I also fixed all of the wiring in the LSC model to also reflect the diagram.
Once this was all done, I rebuilt and restarted the LSC model, and confirmed that the anti-whitening filter banks in the PD input filter modules were indeed switching the correct bits. I'll next put together a script to confirm that the LSC PD whitening is switching as it should.
I repeated the BS oplev spectrum today and I do not understand why it does look different. I did it as Kiwamu describes it in entry#4948 The oplev servo was left ON!
In order to test this preliminary circuit, I need to build the photosensor heads. Yesterday, Suresh helped me to open one of the professionally-build photosensors in the lab to understand how to arrange my photosensor heads. I now understand that I need to rigidly-mount the PCB to photosensor head box. I plan to use the PCB below. It will be sufficient for the lower-frequency range (below 10Hz) that I am interested in.
I would like to use a metal box like the one below to make each photosensor head. I looked in the lab last night for similar boxes but could not find one. Does anyone know where I can find a similar metal box?
I am now working on accelerometer. I am working on attaching these metal wires to the pins of the accelerometer so that I can use clip leads to power and extract voltage measurements from my circuit.
For the phase locking or beat note measuring we only need ~1 mW. Its a bad idea to send so much power into the fiber because of SBS and safety. The power should be lowered until the output at the PSL is < 2 mW. In terms of SNR, there's no advantage to use such high powers.
It is working today! Finally I repeated the BS spectra, that we did with Kiwamu last week
The optical levers were centered during these measurements without the reference of locked cavities. They have no reference value now.
SRM sus need some help. ITMX is showing pitch/yaw modes of the pendulum .....OSEM damping is weak?
In addition to the OL quadrants, you need to plot the OPLEV_PERROR and OPLEV_YERROR signals since these are the real signals we use for finding the mirror motion. If they're not in the Dataviewer, Jamie should add them as 256 Hz DAQ channels (using these names so that we have the continuity with the past). These DAQ channels correspond to the IN1 channels for the OL filter banks.
Also JPG are banned from the elog - you should put all of the plots into a single, multipage PDF file in honor of the new Wagonga.
Well,the plan is to put in a neutral density filter in the beam path before it enters the fibre. But before I could do that, I set up the camera on the PSL table to look at the fiber output . I will need it while I realign the beam after putting in the Neutral Density Filter. I have attached the ETMY layout with the Neutral Density filter in place herewith.
The fibres carrying the beams from the ETMX as well as the ETMY have been routed to the PSL table now.
A part of the PSL beam has to be superposed on the fibre-outputs to obtain a beat signal. We have located a stray beam on the PSL(which is currently being dumped) which we plan to redirect for the same. The layout of the plan is attached herewith.
It was unlocked since ~4:30am. No idea why. It's relocked so I can try round N of measuring the PRC length.
There's too much tromping around, so I'm not going to actually measure PRC length right now, but I did set some channels to be acquired (POPDC, POXDC, POYDC) in addition to ASDC which was already acquired, so that I can look at the resonance fringes when I sweep the ABSL laser (hopefully later tonight....)
We decided to take on the deceptively easy-sounding task of checking that the LSC whitening switching was happening as anticipated. We hoped to discover that when we clicked the "unwhitening" switches in FM1 of the LSC PDs, we would see the analog whitening turn on and off for the matching channel. That is what is supposed to happen.
Tragically, it is instead one big giant crazy disaster of a mess.
What we did:
Made a 24tapus (octopus like last time, except more...), with a 50kOhm resistor as our white noise source (instead of using a DAC channel and AWG).
We plugged our 24tapus into the 3 of 4 whitening boards on the LSC rack that are currently in use. One of the boards just has 8 terminators on the input, so we left that one alone for now.
We put the whitening gains to 0dB so that all the channels looked the same.
We looked at the PD _IN1 channels in DTT, and monitored which signals had whitening switching when we clicked the "unwhitening" buttons on the PD filter banks.
So far, we can find no rhyme or reason as to why some of the channels work (click unwhite on that PD, see that signal have whitening switching), and others don't. Some channels we just can't get to switch no matter what, others are just mis-mapped. There is no discernible pattern.
What we think (so far) is going on:
All of the cables from the PD demod boards are going to the Whitening board inputs, exactly as in Suresh's Diagram. The only difference is that Refl33, AS165 and Refl165 demod boards don't exist in the rack at this time.
The Whitening and AA boards in Suresh's Diagram labeled 0-7 are connected to Binary Output channels 0-7. This is a good thing.
The Whitening and AA boards in the diagram labeled 8-15 are connected to Binary Output channels 24-31. This is not so awesome.
This is all we are confident about at this time.
We are hoping that Ben has a secret stash (or can tell us who would) of LSC rack wiring diagrams. We would like to find out, without the pain of tracing wires and cables by hand, how the Binary I/O information gets through the cross-connect on the LSC rack up to the whitening boards.
We are leaving the 24tapus in place for now, so that we can carry on tomorrow, either with a wiring diagram in hand, or carefully tracing cables.
Today I learned some important circuit-building lessons while testing my photosensor circuit box (i.e. how NOT to test a circuit and, conversely, things that should be done instead).
I blew my first circuit today. The victim is in the photo below (bottom 7805 voltage regulator). The plastic covering fell off after I removed the fried regulator. After checking various components, I figured out that I blew the circuit because I had forgotten to ground the regulator. Although this was very unfortunate, I did make an important discovery. While testing the voltage output of the 7805 voltage regulator (I put a new one), I discovered that contrary to the claims of the datasheet, an input voltage of 5V will not produce a steady 5V supply. I found that at 5V, my regulator was only producing 4.117 V. I was using a 5 V supply because I wanted to use only 1 power supply (I was using a two-channel power supply that had a fixed 5V output to produce the +15, -15, ground, and 5 V I need for my photosensor circuit box). After seeing this, I got a second power supply and am now using 10V to as an input for the regulator to produce 4.961V. I found that from a voltage range of 10V to 15 V, the regulator produced a steady 4.961 V supply. I have decided to use 10V as an input. My newly-grounded voltage regulator did not smoke or get hot at 10V.
After several more debugging trials (my LED was still not lighting up, according to the infared viewer), I learned another painful lesson. I learned DO NOT USE CLIP LEADS TO TEST CIRCUITS!!!! Initally, I was powering my circuit and making all of my connections between the photosensor head (2 photodiodes and 1 LED) with clip leads. This was a BAD IDEA BECAUSE CLIP LEADS ARE UNSTABLE AND IT IS VERY EASY TO SHORT A CIRCUIT IF THEY ACCIDENTALLY TOUCH! I did not realize this important lesson until my photosensor circuit was once again burning. Confused as to why my circuit was once again burning, I foolishly touched the voltage regulator. As you can see on the top voltage regulator in the photo below, my finger left its mark on the smoldering voltage regulator. As you cannot see the wincing on my face as I try to type this long elog, I will painfully type that the voltage regulator left its own mark on my finger (an ugly sore little welt). Suresh has taught me a valuable lesson: WHEN DEALING WITH SOMETHING OF QUESTIONABLE/UNKNOWN TEMPERATURE, USE YOUR NOSE, NOT YOUR FINGER TO DETERMINE IF THAT COMPONENT IS HOT!!!!
To make my circuit-testing safer, upon the suggestion of Suresh, I have since removed the clip leads and inserted a 12 pin IDC component (pictured below). There are 12 pins for the 6 inputs I will get from each of the 2 photosensor heads. I have requested orders for a 16 pin IDC connector, 15 pin Dsub male part, 15 pin Dsub feed-thru, 9 pin Dsub male part (2), and 9 pin Dsub feed-thru (2). After receiving these components, I should be able to safely test my circuit.
In the meanwhile, I can explore SimMechanics and try to figure out how to use the accelerometer
The PRM watchdogs were tripped. The side was kicked up to 180mV Damping was restored.
At 0 dB, the resistor noise is only 30 nV/rHz, whereas the ADC noise is more like 10000 nV/rHz...
Please return sensor card to laser log box so others can use it. We have only one larger fluorescent sensor card.
There is should be a few IDC connectors in the lab (and some ribbon cable) using which you can proceed with the testing of the circuit, if you prefer. If not we can get them from our ever helpful electronics division at Downs. In any case there is no need to lose time waiting for parts to arrive.
I installed Virtual Box on rossa. Then I put Windows 7 in there and am now installing Altium.
You can run Windows on rossa by just clicking Applications -> System Tools -> Virtual Box.
Rana and I are working on the AA/AI circuit for Cymac. We need relays to bypass certain paths in the circuit, and we just found a nice website
explaining how to choose the right relay:
This piece of information could be useful for others.
Yesterday we started going through the LSC binary whitening switching to make sure the new switching control in the LSC model was working. Jenne and I hooked up a fancy home-brew white noise generator  into all of the LSC whitening filter inputs and started switching the whitening filters to see what would happen. We found that some of the channels were switching, but the majority were not, or worse yet switching the wrong channels. Upon closer inspection, and after finally finding the LSC wiring schematic, we found that the LSC rack cross-connect/back-plane cabling was pretty much a complete mess, and didn't at all correspond to the channel layout in Suresh's diagram.
Given that the back-plane wiring had to be almost completely redone, we decided to completely redo the LSC electronics layout, to be a little more self-consistent and to use the given space more efficiently. We'll post an updated electronics drawing soon. The LSC model was also updated to reflect the new layout.
We then went through and verified that all of the whitening switching was working with the new layout. As described previously, the first filter in the PD input filter bank is used to control the switching. We did indeed verify that all the switching is working, but we noticed that switching logic was inverted, such that the whitening filter engaged when the filter was turned off. This was fixed in the model and all the switching logic was verified to be working as expected.
Everything has now been hooked back up, but we need to verify that we're getting all of the PD demodulated RF and DC outputs as expected. We need to check the RF phases, as some of the RF cable lengths have changed.
 a 50k resistor
While aligning the Y-end aux laser light into the fiber we noticed that the green power out of the doubling crystal was in microwatts. I checked to see what was the trouble and found that the oven was cold as the temperature controller had been disabled. I enabled it and scanned the temperature to maximise the green output. Yet the power is less than 10% of that at the X end (7mW).
To verify I checked the power of various beams on the Y-end table. They are listed below in the picture
The green beam power is proportional to the square of the IR incident power and this explains the drop in green power by a factor of (210/730)^2 thus making 7 mW --> 0.5 mW. However we may be able to double the power at the Y-arm oven if the uncoated lenses in the IR path are exchaned for coated ones.
The green beam injection into the Y-arm cavity also needs to be cleaned up as noted here. As seen in the picture below two of the mirrors which launch the beam into the arm cavity need to be fixed as well.
As a simple check of the gains on all the quadrants I hooked up the AM (Jenne) laser to put FM modulated light on to the WFS heads and observed the FM modulation frequency , 105 Hz, show up on a power spectrum of the RF outputs. The plots below show the peak at 105Hz in all the quadrants.
However I should have put in AM modulation rather FM modulation. I will do that using the digital system today. The first version above was done wth a Marconi driving the AM laser modulation.
According the plan, I started to use the IR beam dumped after the doubling crystal for the IR beat lock (Sonali's project). The beat lock was disturbed when I shifted some clamps to make way for a few mirrors. So I set about fixing the beat lock. I reobtained the lock but noticed that the net beam power reaching the Newfocus 1611 detector was around 15mW. 10mW from the ABSL and 5mW from PSL.
I therefore started to adjust the power levels by using Y1-1064-45S mirrors at non-45 deg angles. However Rana pointed out that this would lead to amplitude noise due to the mirror vibrations. I then switched to using beam splitters as pick offs. This is better than using neutral density filters since the back scatter is lower this way.
David wanted some of the ABSL beam for his SURF student. So I changed the mirror after beam expanding telescope on the ABSL route to provide this power. We also installed a pair of half wave plates and a PBS to allow us smooth power level control on this beam.
The beat lock setup is now down and needs to be completed for PRCL and SRCL measurements.
I finished wih the set-up at the ETMY table. Instead of the neutral Density Filter , I put in a mirror(Y1-1037-45S) which is reflective for IR , so that only 1% of the light is incident on the fibre as per Rana's suggestion.
Now, the power incident on the fibre is measured to be 6 mW and the power measured out of the fibre is 2.76 mW after the necessary alignments.
On the PSL able, I have routed the beam that is coming out of the back of the PMC(instead of the dumped light from the oven to prevent any light from reflecting back into the laser), to the area where I am putting the set-up for the superposition of the PSL and the ETMX and ETMY beams.
Today I will proceed with the layout.
C1:SUS-ETMX_OLPIT_GAIN set to 1.0 OLYAW 1.0
ETMY -0.2 -0.2
ITMY 2.0 -2.0
ITMX 0.5 0.5
BS 0.4 -0.4
PRM 0.5 -0.7
SRM 1.0 1.0
Earlier today Rana and I made power spectra of ETMY_OPLEV_ERROR signals with servo on and off.
It was indicating that the servo is not doing anything. These gain values were not set since IFO rebuilt.
Valera's entries were searched also. He did not do such thing. Rana may know where it is in the elog if it happened.
I restarted the frame builder in the last 15mins.
I was making a change to a DAC channel in the C1IOO model.