|
40m
QIL
Cryo_Lab
CTN
SUS_Lab
CAML
OMC_Lab
CRIME_Lab
FEA
ENG_Labs
OptContFac
Mariner
WBEEShop
|
| 40m elog |
Not logged in |
 |
|
|
 Wed Jan 8 13:01:48 2014, Gabriele, Summary, LSC, Effect of PRC length mismatch on error signals 
|
 Wed Jan 8 16:08:52 2014, ericq, Summary, LSC, Effect of PRC length mismatch on error signals
| |
Wed Jan 8 19:05:30 2014, Gabriele, Summary, LSC, Effect of PRC length mismatch on error signals
| |
Thu Jan 9 17:58:31 2014, ericq, Summary, LSC, Effect of PRC length mismatch on error signals
| |
Fri Jan 10 15:31:07 2014, rana, Summary, LSC, Effect of PRC length mismatch on error signals
| |
Sun Jan 12 09:57:24 2014, Gabriele, Summary, LSC, Effect of PRC length mismatch on error signals
|
|
|
Message ID: 9537
Entry time: Wed Jan 8 13:01:48 2014
Reply to this: 9539
|
| Author: |
Gabriele |
| Type: |
Summary |
| Category: |
LSC |
| Subject: |
Effect of PRC length mismatch on error signals |
|
|
I ran a simulation of a double cavity with a PRC length mismatched w.r.t. the modulation frequency. I summarized the results in the attached PDF. I think it would be important to have a cross check of the results.
In brief:
A mismatch between PRC length and modulation frequency do have an effect on error signals
Multiple zeros appear in REFL_3f/PRCL that can be removed by careful tuning of the demodulation phase (however, the shape of the signal makes difficult to understand which phase is good…)
No visible effect on REFL_1f/CARM
But a large PRCL signal appears in REFL_1f_I, which is used to control CARM. This is not good.
A mismatch of the order of 0.5 cm has a small effect.
|
|
|