40m QIL Cryo_Lab CTN SUS_Lab TCS_Lab OMC_Lab CRIME_Lab FEA ENG_Labs OptContFac Mariner WBEEShop
  40m Log  Not logged in ELOG logo
Entry  Tue Nov 19 21:28:05 2013, manasa, Update, LSC, PRMI carrier locking 
    Reply  Tue Nov 19 21:59:35 2013, manasa, Update, LSC, PRMI carrier locking 
       Reply  Wed Nov 20 01:10:38 2013, Jenne, Update, LSC, PRMI carrier locking 
          Reply  Wed Nov 20 16:05:52 2013, Jenne, Update, LSC, PRMI carrier locking, OpLev Check 
Message ID: 9417     Entry time: Wed Nov 20 16:05:52 2013     In reply to: 9416
Author: Jenne 
Type: Update 
Category: LSC 
Subject: PRMI carrier locking, OpLev Check 

[Jenne, EricQ]

We locked the PRMI on carrier again today, after lunch.  Following a suggestion from the 40m meeting, we wanted to compare the PRMI carrier fluctuations with the new vs. old OpLev servo for the PRM. 

To do change between the servo shapes, I put in an elliptic lowpass at 35Hz, since I overwrote that with the 55Hz lowpass the other day.  The only other change between shapes is turning on and off my boost / emphasis filter. 

So, the scenarios were:

(1) New OpLev servo

(2) Old OpLev servo (no boost, but 3.2Hz res gain and bounce roll notches on), with 55Hz lowpass

(3) Old OpLev servo with 35Hz lowpass

For scenario (1), like last night, there were small power fluctuations.  For scenario (2), most of the time there were small power fluctuations, but occasionally there would be a kick somewhere, and the power would dip down by ~50%, and the fluctuations would continue like a ringdown for a few seconds, and then we'd be back to small fluctuations until the next kick.  For scenario (3), even with trying different LSC servo gains, we could not get the PRMI to lock on carrier for more than a few tenths of a second.  During that time, the power fluctuations were very large. 

So, the old oplev servo was kind of okay, but the lowpass at 35 Hz was bad, bad, bad.  It seems that the new OpLev servo is doing good things for us.

ELOG V3.1.3-