40m
QIL
Cryo_Lab
CTN
SUS_Lab
TCS_Lab
OMC_Lab
CRIME_Lab
FEA
ENG_Labs
OptContFac
Mariner
WBEEShop
|
40m Log |
Not logged in |
 |
|
Wed Oct 23 00:05:17 2013, manasa, Update, SUS, Unstable Y arm ALS points to problems with ETMY suspension
|
Wed Oct 23 09:17:33 2013, Steve, Update, SUS, ETMY sensors compared to ETMX   
|
Wed Oct 23 11:42:28 2013, rana, Update, SUS, ETMY sensors compared to ETMX
|
Wed Oct 23 15:48:06 2013, rana, Update, SUS, ETMY sensors compared to ETMX
|
Wed Oct 23 17:30:17 2013, jamie, Update, SUS, ETMY sensors compared to ETMX
|
Wed Oct 23 18:24:56 2013, rana, Update, SUS, ETMY sensors compared to ETMX
|
Wed Oct 23 18:28:01 2013, Jenne, Update, SUS, ETMY sensors compared to ETMX 
|
Thu Oct 24 10:31:25 2013, Steve, Update, SUS, ETMY sensors compared to ETMX 
|
Tue Oct 29 10:51:16 2013, Masayuki, Update, SUS, ETMY sensors compared to ETMX
|
Tue Oct 29 22:33:57 2013, rana, Update, SUS, ETMY sensors compared to ETMX
|
Wed Oct 30 14:58:44 2013, Steve, HowTo, General, shutting down a computer
|
Thu Oct 24 12:00:11 2013, jamie, Update, CDS, fb acquisition of slow channels
|
Fri Oct 25 01:46:33 2013, rana, Update, CDS, fb acquisition of slow channels
|
|
Message ID: 9263
Entry time: Wed Oct 23 11:42:28 2013
In reply to: 9262
|
Author: |
rana |
Type: |
Update |
Category: |
SUS |
Subject: |
ETMY sensors compared to ETMX |
|
|
This is not really definitive. The 0.1-0.3 Hz band is not the right one to look for seismic transients - it should be the higher frequency ones.
The other test to do is to turn off the ETMY damping and then look for glitching in the sensors. And then, of course, check to see that no one has bumped the satellite box with a cart or a mop... |