|
40m
QIL
Cryo_Lab
CTN
SUS_Lab
TCS_Lab
OMC_Lab
CRIME_Lab
FEA
ENG_Labs
OptContFac
Mariner
WBEEShop
|
| 40m Log |
Not logged in |
 |
|
|
 Fri Apr 12 02:56:34 2013, Den, Update, Locking, prcl angular motion 
|
 Fri Apr 12 09:20:32 2013, rana, Update, Locking, prcl angular motion
| |
Fri Apr 12 13:21:34 2013, Den, Update, Locking, prcl angular motion
| |
Sat Apr 13 03:45:51 2013, rana, Update, Locking, prcl angular motion
| |
Sat Apr 13 23:11:04 2013, Den, Update, Locking, prcl angular motion
| |
Sun Apr 14 17:56:03 2013, rana, Update, Locking, prcl angular motion
| |
Mon May 13 18:44:04 2013, Jenne, Update, Locking, prcl angular motion
|
|
|
Message ID: 8451
Entry time: Sat Apr 13 23:11:04 2013
In reply to: 8450
Reply to this: 8454
8564
|
| Author: |
Den |
| Type: |
Update |
| Category: |
Locking |
| Subject: |
prcl angular motion |
|
|
| Quote: |
|
For the PRM, it is also a mostly translation effect as calculated at the PRC waist position (ITM face).
|
I made another estimation assuming that PRCL RIN is caused by translation of the cavity axis:
- calibrated RIN to translation, beam waist = 4mm
- measured PRM yaw motion using oplev
- estimated PR3 TT yaw motion: measured BS yaw spectrum with oplev OFF, divided it by pendulum TF with f0=0.9 Hz, Q=100 (BS TF), multiplied it by pendulum TF with f0 = 1.5 Hz, Q = 2 (TT TF with eddy current damping), accounted for BS local damping that reduces Q down to 10.
PRM and TT angular motion to cavity axis translation I estimated as 0.11 mm/urad and 0.22 mm/urad assuming that TTs are flat. We can make a more detailed analysis to account for curvature.
I think beam motion is caused by PR3 and PR2 TT angular motion. I guess yaw motion is larger because horizontal g-factor is closer to unity then vertical. |
|
|