40m QIL Cryo_Lab CTN SUS_Lab CAML OMC_Lab CRIME_Lab FEA ENG_Labs OptContFac Mariner WBEEShop
  40m Log  Not logged in ELOG logo
 List  |  Find  |  Login  |  Help 
Entry  Thu Feb 7 12:56:18 2013, Jamie, Summary, General, PRC/arm mode matching calculations 8x
    Reply  Thu Feb 7 17:10:11 2013, Koji, Summary, General, PRC/arm mode matching calculations 
       Reply  Fri Feb 8 00:23:33 2013, rana, Summary, General, PRC/arm mode matching calculations 
          Reply  Fri Feb 8 11:07:07 2013, Jamie, Summary, General, PRC/arm mode matching calculations 
             Reply  Fri Feb 8 12:42:45 2013, nicolas, Summary, General, PRC/arm mode matching calculations 
Message ID: 8025     Entry time: Thu Feb 7 17:10:11 2013     In reply to: 8022     Reply to this: 8029
Author: Koji 
Type: Summary 
Category: General 
Subject: PRC/arm mode matching calculations 

Quote:

I left out the current situation (PR2/3 with -600 RoC) and the case where only PR3 is flipped, since those are both unstable according to a la mode.

This surprises me. I am curious to know the reason why we can't make the cavity stable by flipping the PR3 as PR3 was supposed to have more lensing effect than PR2 according to my statement.

ELOG V3.1.3-