40m
QIL
Cryo_Lab
CTN
SUS_Lab
TCS_Lab
OMC_Lab
CRIME_Lab
FEA
ENG_Labs
OptContFac
Mariner
WBEEShop
|
40m Log |
Not logged in |
 |
|
Sun Feb 3 13:20:02 2013, Koji, Summary, General, Hypothesis 
|
Mon Feb 4 10:45:51 2013, Jamie, Summary, General, rough analysis of aligned PRM-PR2 mode scan
|
Mon Feb 4 11:10:59 2013, Koji, Summary, General, rough analysis of aligned PRM-PR2 mode scan
|
Mon Feb 4 19:33:19 2013, yuta, Summary, General, rough analysis of aligned PRM-PR2 mode scan
|
Tue Feb 5 02:04:44 2013, yuta, Summary, General, rough analysis of aligned PRM-PR2 mode scan
|
Tue Feb 5 03:16:51 2013, Koji, Summary, General, rough analysis of aligned PRM-PR2 mode scan
|
Tue Feb 5 10:09:08 2013, yuta, Summary, General, rough analysis of aligned PRM-PR2 mode scan
|
Tue Feb 5 11:30:19 2013, Koji, Summary, General, rough analysis of aligned PRM-PR2 mode scan
|
Wed Feb 13 01:26:08 2013, yuta, Summary, General, rough analysis of aligned PRM-PR2 mode scan
|
Wed Feb 6 15:20:55 2013, yuta, Summary, General, FWHM was wrong
|
Mon Feb 4 15:06:56 2013, Koji, Summary, General, Hypothesis
|
Mon Feb 4 19:48:32 2013, Jamie, Summary, General, arbcav recalc of PRC with correct ITM transmission 
|
|
Message ID: 8000
Entry time: Tue Feb 5 10:09:08 2013
In reply to: 7998
Reply to this: 8002
|
Author: |
yuta |
Type: |
Summary |
Category: |
General |
Subject: |
rough analysis of aligned PRM-PR2 mode scan |
|
|
stdev of [0.764, 0.751] is 0.007, but what we need is the error of the averaged number. Statistical error of the averaged number is stdev/sqrt(n).
Quote: |
0.764 and 0.751 do not give us the stdev of 0.005.
|
|