|
40m
QIL
Cryo_Lab
CTN
SUS_Lab
TCS_Lab
OMC_Lab
CRIME_Lab
FEA
ENG_Labs
OptContFac
Mariner
WBEEShop
|
| 40m Log |
Not logged in |
 |
|
|
 Sun Feb 3 13:20:02 2013, Koji, Summary, General, Hypothesis 
|
 Mon Feb 4 10:45:51 2013, Jamie, Summary, General, rough analysis of aligned PRM-PR2 mode scan
| |
Mon Feb 4 11:10:59 2013, Koji, Summary, General, rough analysis of aligned PRM-PR2 mode scan
| |
Mon Feb 4 19:33:19 2013, yuta, Summary, General, rough analysis of aligned PRM-PR2 mode scan
| |
Tue Feb 5 02:04:44 2013, yuta, Summary, General, rough analysis of aligned PRM-PR2 mode scan
| |
Tue Feb 5 03:16:51 2013, Koji, Summary, General, rough analysis of aligned PRM-PR2 mode scan
| |
Tue Feb 5 10:09:08 2013, yuta, Summary, General, rough analysis of aligned PRM-PR2 mode scan
| |
Tue Feb 5 11:30:19 2013, Koji, Summary, General, rough analysis of aligned PRM-PR2 mode scan
| |
Wed Feb 13 01:26:08 2013, yuta, Summary, General, rough analysis of aligned PRM-PR2 mode scan
| |
Wed Feb 6 15:20:55 2013, yuta, Summary, General, FWHM was wrong
| |
Mon Feb 4 15:06:56 2013, Koji, Summary, General, Hypothesis
| |
Mon Feb 4 19:48:32 2013, Jamie, Summary, General, arbcav recalc of PRC with correct ITM transmission
|
|
|
Message ID: 7998
Entry time: Tue Feb 5 03:16:51 2013
In reply to: 7997
Reply to this: 8000
|
| Author: |
Koji |
| Type: |
Summary |
| Category: |
General |
| Subject: |
rough analysis of aligned PRM-PR2 mode scan |
|
|
0.764 and 0.751 do not give us the stdev of 0.005.
I have never seen any Yokogawa in vicinity.
| Quote: |
|
Measured FWHM was 0.764 MHz and 0.751 MHz. By taking the average, FWHM = 0.757 +/- 0.005 MHz.
This gives you Finesse = 104 +/- 1, which is OK compared with the expectation.
What I need
I need better oscilloscope so that we can take longer data (~1 sec) with higher resolution (~0.004 V/count, ~50kHz).
TDS 3034B can take data only for 10 ksamples, one channel by one! I prefer Yokogawa DL750 or later.
|
|