|
40m
QIL
Cryo_Lab
CTN
SUS_Lab
TCS_Lab
OMC_Lab
CRIME_Lab
FEA
ENG_Labs
OptContFac
Mariner
WBEEShop
|
| 40m Log |
Not logged in |
 |
|
|
 Tue Jul 29 13:54:08 2008, rana, Update, SUS, ETMY and PRM have EQ related problems 
|
 Tue Jul 29 14:38:02 2008, rob, Update, SUS, ETMY and PRM have EQ related problems
| |
Tue Jul 29 19:53:19 2008, Koji, Update, SUS, PRM photos from the south window
|
|
|
Message ID: 756
Entry time: Tue Jul 29 14:38:02 2008
In reply to: 755
Reply to this: 759
|
| Author: |
rob |
| Type: |
Update |
| Category: |
SUS |
| Subject: |
ETMY and PRM have EQ related problems |
|
|
| Quote: | The attached trend shows that ETMY and PRM both had large steps in their sensors
around the time of the EQ and didn't return afterwards. The calibration of the
OSEM sensors is ~0.5 mm/V. The PRM sensors respond when we give it huge biases
but there is very little change in the ETMY. Almost certainly true that the
optics have shifted in their wire slings and that we will have to vent to
examine and repair at least ETMY.
Jenne is looking at the spectra of the other suspensions to see if there is
other more subtle issues. |
Some additional notes/update:
ETMY, PRM, & MC2 had OSEM signals at a rail (indicating stuck optics). Driving the optics with full scale DAC output freed ETMY and MC2, so while these may have shifted in their slings it may be possible to avoid a repair vent. PRM is still stuck. One OSEM appears to respond with full range to large drives, but the other three face OSEMS remain disturbingly near the rail (HIGH, which is what would happen if a magnet fell off). |