|
40m
QIL
Cryo_Lab
CTN
SUS_Lab
TCS_Lab
OMC_Lab
CRIME_Lab
FEA
ENG_Labs
OptContFac
Mariner
WBEEShop
|
| 40m Log |
Not logged in |
 |
|
|
 Fri Jul 18 19:41:09 2008, Yoichi, Update, PSL, PMC PZT investigation 
|
 Fri Jul 18 23:24:24 2008, rob, Update, PSL, PMC PZT investigation
| |
Sat Jul 19 19:39:44 2008, rob, Update, PSL, PMC PZT investigation
|
|
|
Message ID: 702
Entry time: Sat Jul 19 19:39:44 2008
In reply to: 701
|
| Author: |
rob |
| Type: |
Update |
| Category: |
PSL |
| Subject: |
PMC PZT investigation |
|
|
| Quote: |
| Quote: | | The 64k is the series resistor after the PA85, not the modeled resistance of the PZT itself. |
Yes. What I meant was that because the measured voltage across the PZT was a half of the open voltage of the HV amp, the DC impedance of the PZT is expected to be similar to the output impedance of the HV amp. Of course, I don't think the DC impedance of a normal PZT should be such low.
I'm puzzled by the discrepancy between this expected DC impedance and the directly measured impedance by the Fluke DVM (1.5M Ohm).
One possibility is that the PZT leaks current only when a high voltage is applied. |
ELOG V3.1.3-
|