[Jenne, Yuta]
We put 0 dBm sine wave to the RF input of the beatbox and linear-sweeped frequency of the sine wave from 0 to 200 MHz using network analyzer (Aligent 4395A).
(We first tried to use 11 MHz EOM marconi)
Whlile the sweep, we recorded the output of the beatbox, C1:ALS-BEATY_(FINE|COARSE)_(I|Q)_IN1_DQ. We made them DQ channels today. Also, we put gain 10 after the beatbox before ADC for temporal whitening filter using SR560s.
We fitted the signals with sine wave using least squares fit(scipy.optimize.leastsq).
Transision time of the frequency from 200 MHz to 0 Hz can be seen from the discontinuity in the time series. We can convert time to frequency using this and supposing linear sweep of the network analyzer is perfect.
Plots below are time series data of each signal(top) and expansion of the fitted region with x axis calibrated in frequency (bottom).
We got
C1:ALS-BEATY_COARSE_I_IN1_DQ = -1400 sin(0.048 freq + 1.17pi) - 410
C1:ALS-BEATY_COARSE_Q_IN1_DQ = 1900 sin(0.045 freq + 0.80pi) - 95
C1:ALS-BEATY_FINE_I_IN1_DQ = 1400 sin(0.89 freq + 0.74pi) + 15
C1:ALS-BEATY_FINE_Q_IN1_DQ = 1400 sin(0.89 freq + 1.24pi) - 3.4
(freq in MHz)
The delay line length calculated from this fitted value (supposing speed of signal in cable is 0.7c) is;
D_coarse = 0.7c * 0.048/(2*pi*1MHz) = 1.6 m
D_fine = 0.7c * 0.89/(2*pi*1MHz) = 30 m
So, the measurement look quite reasonable.
FINE signals looks nice because we have similar response with 0.5pi phase difference.
For COARSE, maybe we need to do the measurement again because the frequency discontinuity may affected the shape of the signal. |