[Suresh, Jenne]
The input beam is most probably being clipped at the Faraday Isolator.
Evidence:
a) The beam scan of the IPPOS beam showed a nongaussian beam in the horizontal direction. This was visible in the beam scan since it overlays a gaussian-fit over the data.
b) I was able to remove this departure from gaussian profile by introducing an offset of 5 into the C1:IOO-WFS2_YAW_OFFSET.
c) We made a few measurements of the beam diameter as a function of distance at an offset of 7. At a distance of beyond 3 m the deviation from gaussian profile was once again apparent.
d) We increased the offset to 14 to remove this deviation.
e) When we measured the beam diameter again with this new offset the horizontal diameter and vertical diameters dropped by 2.sigma. Indicating there the beam was clipped till then.
f) We increased the offset to 16 and the beam diameter did not change further (within 1.sigma). Implying no more clipping, hopefully.
And then the earthquake stopped us from proceeding further.
We plan to investigate this further to be sure.. Data attached.
Subsidiary effects to keep track of:
1) Introducing an offset into the WFS loops decreases the coupling from PSL into MC.
2) If the beam is being clipped at the Faraday Isolator then the REFL beam would also show lesser clipping with WFS offsets. |