40m QIL Cryo_Lab CTN SUS_Lab TCS_Lab OMC_Lab CRIME_Lab FEA ENG_Labs OptContFac Mariner WBEEShop
  40m Log  Not logged in ELOG logo
Entry  Mon Apr 2 18:24:34 2012, keiko, Update, LSC, RAM simulation for Full ifo 
    Reply  Tue Apr 3 01:52:15 2012, Zach, Update, LSC, RAM simulation for Full ifo 
       Reply  Tue Apr 3 14:11:33 2012, keiko, Update, LSC, RAM simulation for Full ifo 
    Reply  Tue Apr 3 14:17:18 2012, keiko, Update, LSC, RAM simulation for Full ifo flowchart.png
       Reply  Tue Apr 3 15:50:58 2012, keiko, Update, LSC, RAM simulation for Full ifo 
          Reply  Tue Apr 3 22:50:37 2012, keiko, Update, LSC, RAM simulation for Full ifo 
             Reply  Wed Apr 4 23:57:35 2012, keiko, Update, LSC, RAM simulation for Full ifo 
                Reply  Sat Apr 7 00:31:12 2012, keiko, Update, LSC, RAM simulation for Full ifo plot4a.pngplot4b.png
Message ID: 6483     Entry time: Tue Apr 3 22:50:37 2012     In reply to: 6482     Reply to this: 6486
Author: keiko 
Type: Update 
Category: LSC 
Subject: RAM simulation for Full ifo 

Koji and Jamie suggested me to include the coupling between DoFs when I calculate the last matrix. So far, I just add all the pos-offsets of 5 DoFs and re-calculate the matrix again. However, once I add one DoF pos-offset, it could already change the LSC matrix therefore different pos-offset to the other four DoF, we must iterate this process until we get the equilibrium pos-offsets for 5 DoFs.

I also noticed an error in the optical configuration file. AM mod levels were smaller than that supposed to be because of the hald power going through the AM-EOMs in the MZI paths. Also I have put PM-Mods in the MZT path which gives the smaller mod indexes. So, smaller mod levels were applied both for PM and AM. As PM-AM ratio is still kept in this, so the matrices were not very wrong, I assume. I'll modify that and post the results again.

ELOG V3.1.3-