40m
QIL
Cryo_Lab
CTN
SUS_Lab
TCS_Lab
OMC_Lab
CRIME_Lab
FEA
ENG_Labs
OptContFac
Mariner
WBEEShop
|
40m Log |
Not logged in |
 |
|
Mon Mar 26 23:47:54 2012, Suresh, Update, IOO, Beam Profile measurement: IPPOS beam  
|
Tue Mar 27 02:05:40 2012, Suresh, Update, IOO, Beam Profile measurement: IPPOS beam 
|
Tue Mar 27 11:54:18 2012, Jenne, Update, IOO, Beam Profile measurement: IPPOS beam
|
Tue Mar 27 18:03:46 2012, Jenne, Update, IOO, Beam Profile measurement: IPPOS beam
|
Tue Mar 27 21:20:32 2012, Jenne, Update, IOO, Beam Profile measurement: IPPOS beam
|
Tue Mar 27 23:37:35 2012, Suresh, Update, IOO, Beam Profile measurement: IPPOS beam
|
Wed Mar 28 01:17:29 2012, Jenne, Update, IOO, Beam Profile measurement: IPPOS beam  
|
Wed Mar 28 18:26:47 2012, Jenne, Update, IOO, Beam Profile measurement: IPPOS beam   
|
Wed Mar 28 20:54:02 2012, Jenne, Update, IOO, Beam Profile measurement: IPPOS beam 
|
Mon Apr 2 18:58:32 2012, Jenne, Update, IOO, Beam Profile measurement: IPPOS beam
|
Mon Apr 2 23:06:38 2012, Suresh, Update, IOO, Beam Profile measurement: IPPOS beam: Mystery deepens  
|
Tue Mar 27 17:19:02 2012, Koji, Update, IOO, Beam Profile measurement: IPPOS beam
|
Tue Mar 27 02:18:31 2012, keiko, Update, IOO, Beam Profile measurement: IPPOS beam   
|
Tue Mar 27 16:06:59 2012, keiko, Update, IOO, Beam Profile measurement: IPPOS beam
|
|
Message ID: 6459
Entry time: Tue Mar 27 23:37:35 2012
In reply to: 6457
|
Author: |
Suresh |
Type: |
Update |
Category: |
IOO |
Subject: |
Beam Profile measurement: IPPOS beam |
|
|
Quote: |
Quote: |
The moral of the story that I'm getting from this plot: something funny is going on.
|
Yup, something funny was going on. Nic's MM code that I used, "a la mode", calls for the focal length of the optics, whereas the code that I wrote and used for ages called for the radius of curvature. f = R/2. Fixing that factor of 2 I get something more like:
.....
So, what does it all mean? That I'm not sure of yet.
|
In an attempt to estimate the errors on the fit parameters I upgraded my Mathematica code to use the function 'NonlinearModelFit', which allows us to define weights and also reports the errors on the fit parameters. The plots have been upgraded to show the error bars and residuals.

The parameters determined are given below and compared to the earlier measurements of 06/18/2010
Vertical Profile:
Parameter |
Estimate |
Standard Error |
95% Confidence interval |
06/18/2010 measurement |
Waist (mm) |
2.768 |
0.005 |
2.757 -- 2.779 |
2.81 |
Waist location from MMT2 (m) |
5.85 |
0.12 |
5.625-- 6.093 |
5.36 |
Horizontal Profile:
Parameter |
Estimate |
Standard Error |
95% Confidence Interval |
06/18.2010 measurement |
Waist (mm) |
2.476 |
0.009 |
2.455 -- 2.496 |
2.91 |
Waist Location from MMT2 (m) |
4.935 |
0.145 |
4.645 -- 5.225 |
1.96 |
There is a significant change in the beam waist location (as compared to previous report) because I corrected a mistake in the sign convention that I was using in measuring the distances to the waist from the zero-reference.
|