40m QIL Cryo_Lab CTN SUS_Lab TCS_Lab OMC_Lab CRIME_Lab FEA ENG_Labs OptContFac Mariner WBEEShop
  40m Log  Not logged in ELOG logo
Entry  Fri Mar 23 05:10:46 2012, Suresh, Update, IOO, Beam Profile measurements: Errors too large to yield good fits. rawdataplot.pngPRM-to-REFL-profile.pdf
    Reply  Mon Mar 26 15:15:16 2012, kiwamu, Update, IOO, expected beam profile of PRM reflection expected_edit.png
       Reply  Mon Mar 26 16:25:44 2012, kiwamu, Update, IOO, expected v.s. measured beam profile of PRM reflection PRMreflection.pngDSC_4001_small.jpg
          Reply  Mon Mar 26 18:04:43 2012, kiwamu, Update, IOO, mode scan at the REFL port mode_profile.pngREFLmodescan.zip
Message ID: 6444     Entry time: Mon Mar 26 15:15:16 2012     In reply to: 6441     Reply to this: 6445
Author: kiwamu 
Type: Update 
Category: IOO 
Subject: expected beam profile of PRM reflection 

I have estimated how the mode profile of the PRM reflection should be, as shown in the plot blow.

A conclusion here is :

   we should be able to constrain the PRM curvature situation if measurements are precise and accurate enough with a level of less than ~ 100 um


In the calculation two cases are considered :

      (1) PRM has the correct curvature of  +122 m. This is shown as solid curves in the plot.

      (2) PRM has a wrong curvature of - 122 m (mirror is flipped) This is shown as dashed curves in the plot. 


The plot above shows beam radii of the PRM reflections for vertical and horizontal profiles in each case.
The x-axis is distance from PRM in meter and the y-axis is the beam radii in mm.
As for the initial beam parameter, I used the measured values (see the wiki), which are that of after the beam exits from the mode matching telescope and before it goes to PRM.
(1) If PRM has the correct curvature, the reflection after it passes MMT1 will have ~ 1.6 mm beam radii.
This is intuitively correct because the beam profiles should match to that of the MC exiting beam  (see the wiki), which has waist size of 1.5 - 1.6 mm if everything is perfect.
(2) When PRM is flipped, the beam starts converging at the beginning as PRM act as a convex mirror, resulting in smaller beam sizes after it comes out from the telescope.
Roughly speaking the waist sizes will be different by ~ 5 mm between those two cases, so our measurement should be more precise and accurate than this number.


 I have omitted the effect from the PRM thickness. Therefore PRM is dealt as just a curved reflector with RoC of +/- 122 m in the calculation.


ELOG V3.1.3-