The mode profile of the new input optics was measured.
Although the distance between each optic was not exactly the same as the design because of narrow space,
we measured the profile after the curved mirror (MMT1) that Jenne and Kevin put in the last week.
(interference from MMT1)
Below is a sketch of the current optical path inside of the chamber.

In the beginning of this measurement, the angle between the incident and the reflection on MMT1 (denoted as theta on the sketch) was relatively big (~40deg) although MMT1 was actually made for 0deg incident.
At that time we found a spatially large interference imposed on the Gaussian beam at the beam scan. This is not good for mode measurement
This bad interference can be caused by an extra reflection from the back surface of MMT1 because the interference completely vanished by removing MMT1 .
In order to reduce the interference we decreased the angle theta as small as possible. Actually we made it less than 10deg which was our best due to narrow space.
Now the interference got less and the spot looks better.
The picture below shows an example of the beam shape taken by using the beam scan.
Top panel represents the horizontal mode and bottom panel represents the vertical mode.
You can see some bumps caused by the interference on the horizontal mode, these bumps may lead to overestimation of the horizontal spot size .
(result)

The above plot shows the result of the mode measurement.
Here are the parameter obtained by fitting. The data is also attached as attachment:4
waist size for vertical |
w0v [mm] |
0.509 +/-0.0237 |
waist size for horizontal |
w0h [mm]
|
0.537 +/- 0.0150 |
waist position from MMT1 for vertical |
xv[m] |
-2.91 +/- 0.214 |
waist position from MMT1 for horizontal |
xh[m] |
-2.90 +/- 0.127 |
|