40m QIL Cryo_Lab CTN SUS_Lab TCS_Lab OMC_Lab CRIME_Lab FEA ENG_Labs OptContFac Mariner WBEEShop
  40m Log  Not logged in ELOG logo
Entry  Wed Apr 21 10:09:23 2010, kiwamu, Update, Green Locking, waist positon of Gaussian beam in PPKTP crystals focal_positin_edit.png
    Reply  Tue Apr 27 14:18:53 2010, kiwamu, Update, Green Locking, waist positon of Gaussian beam in PPKTP crystals mode_in_PPKTP.png
       Reply  Thu Jul 29 21:13:39 2010, Dmass, Update, Green Locking, waist positon of Gaussian beam in PPKTP crystals 
          Reply  Thu Jul 29 22:58:25 2010, kiwamu, Update, Green Locking, waist positon of Gaussian beam in PPKTP crystals 
             Reply  Fri Jul 30 00:02:15 2010, Dmass, Update, Green Locking, waist positon of Gaussian beam in PPKTP crystals 
                Reply  Fri Jul 30 09:51:58 2010, kiwamu, Update, Green Locking, Re: waist positon of Gaussian beam in PPKTP crystals efficiency_waist_edit.pngPPKTPmode.pngPSL_doubling.pngmode_in_PPKTP.png
Message ID: 2823     Entry time: Wed Apr 21 10:09:23 2010     Reply to this: 2850  
Author: kiwamu 
Type: Update 
Category: Green Locking 
Subject: waist positon of Gaussian beam in PPKTP crystals 

Theoretically the waist position of a Gaussian beam (1064) in our PPKTP crystal differs by ~6.7 mm from that of the incident Gaussian beam.

So far I have neglected such position change of the beam waist in optical layouts because it is tiny compared with the entire optical path.

But from the point of view of practical experiments, it is better to think about it.

In fact the result suggests the rough positioning of our PPKTP crystals;

we should put our PPKTP crystal so that the center of the crystal is 6.7 mm far from the waist of a Gaussian beam in free space.


(How to)

The calculation is very very simple.

The waist position of a Gaussian beam propagating in a dielectric material should change by a factor of n, where n is the refractive index of the material.

In our case, PPKTP has  n=1.8, so that the waist position from the surface of the crystal becomes longer by n.

Now remember the fact that the maximum conversion efficiency can be achieved if the waist locates at exact center of a crystal.

Therefore the waist position in the crystal should be satisfied this relation; z*n=15 mm, where z is the waist position of the incident beam from the surface and 15 mm is half length of our crystal.

Then we can find z must be ~8.3 mm, which is 6.7 mm shorter than the position in crystal.

The attached figure shows the relation clearly. Note that the waist radius doesn't change.

Attachment 1: focal_positin_edit.png  88 kB  | Hide | Hide all
focal_positin_edit.png
ELOG V3.1.3-