40m QIL Cryo_Lab CTN SUS_Lab TCS_Lab OMC_Lab CRIME_Lab FEA ENG_Labs OptContFac Mariner WBEEShop
  40m Log  Not logged in ELOG logo
Entry  Thu Aug 27 14:00:33 2009, rana, Update, PSL, RC thermal servo impulse response Untitled.png
    Reply  Mon Sep 7 20:05:18 2009, rana, Update, PSL, RCTEMP v. RMTEMP rct2.pngrct.png
    Reply  Mon Sep 7 23:35:03 2009, rana, Update, PSL, RC thermal servo: PID script modified, database + screen added Untitled.png
Message ID: 1968     Entry time: Mon Sep 7 20:05:18 2009     In reply to: 1957
Author: rana 
Type: Update 
Category: PSL 
Subject: RCTEMP v. RMTEMP 

Since ~Aug. 27, the reference cavity has been running with no thermal control. This is not really a problem at the 40m; a 1 deg change of the glass cavity

will produce a 5 x 10-7 strain in the arm cavity. That's around 20 microns of length change.

This open loop time gave us the opportunity to see how good our cavity's vacuum can insulation is.



The first plot below shows the RCTEMP sensors and the RMTEMP sensor. RMTEMP is screwed down to the table close to the can and RCTEMP is on the can, underneath the insulation. I have added a 15 deg offset to RMTEMP so that it would line up with RCTEMP and allow us to see, by eye, what's happening.

There's not enough data here to get a good TF estimate, but if we treat the room temperature as a single frequency (1 / 24 hours) sine wave source, then we can measure the delay and treat it as a phase shift. There's a ~3 hour delay between the RMTEMP and RCTEMP. If the foam acts like a single pole low pass filter, then the phase delay of (3/24)*360 = 45 deg implies a pole at a ~3 hour period. I am not so sure that this is a good foam model, however.

The colorful plot is a scatter plot of RCTEMP v. RMTEMP. The color denotes the time axis - it starts out blue and then becomes red after ten days.

ELOG V3.1.3-