40m QIL Cryo_Lab CTN SUS_Lab TCS_Lab OMC_Lab CRIME_Lab FEA ENG_Labs OptContFac Mariner WBEEShop
  40m Log  Not logged in ELOG logo
Entry  Thu Apr 7 11:47:22 2022, Yehonathan, Update, BHD, Initial BHD modeling: AS - LO mode matching 
    Reply  Thu Apr 7 21:15:04 2022, Yehonathan, Update, BHD, Initial BHD modeling: AS - LO mode matching 
       Reply  Mon May 16 16:13:01 2022, Yehonathan, Update, BHD, Initial BHD modeling: Damped suspension model Damped_SUS.pngETMY_SUSPOS_GOL.pdfSUS_Response.png
          Reply  Thu Jun 16 17:40:15 2022, Yehonathan, Update, BHD, Comparison of MICH OLTF model with measurement MICH_Model_Measurement_Comparison.pdf
             Reply  Fri Jun 17 12:05:32 2022, Yehonathan, Update, BHD, Comparison of MICH OLTF model with measurement 
                Reply  Fri Jun 17 13:07:08 2022, Koji, Update, BHD, Comparison of MICH OLTF model with measurement 
Message ID: 16927     Entry time: Fri Jun 17 12:05:32 2022     In reply to: 16923     Reply to this: 16928
Author: Yehonathan 
Type: Update 
Category: BHD 
Subject: Comparison of MICH OLTF model with measurement 

I should write down what I didn't include for completeness:

1. AA filters

2. AS55 input 60Hz comb filter

3. Violin filters

After discussing with Paco, we agreed that the discrepancy in the MICH calibration might come from the IQ mixing angle which for the IFO is not optimized, while in Finesse is set such that all the amplitude is in one quadrature.

Quote:

I made some progress in modeling MICH loop.

Putting all the LSC and SUS filters together with the MICH Finesse model I constructed an OLTF model and plot it with the measurement done by Paco and Yuta in this elog (attachment 1).

There are 2 unknown numbers that I had to adjust in order to fit the model with the measurement:

1. The SUS damping loop gain (found to be ~ 2.22), which seems to vary wildly from SUS to SUS.

2. The coil driver gain (found to be 45), which I should measure.

I find coil_driver_gain*SUS_damping_filter_gain by increasing it until the SUS damping loop becomes unstable.

The coil driver gain I find by making the measurement and model overlap.

However, there is one outstanding discrepancy between the measurement and the model: Paco and Yuta measure the MICH calibration to be 1.3e9 cts/m while my model shows it to be 1.3e10 cts/m, an order of magnitude larger.

ELOG V3.1.3-