40m
QIL
Cryo_Lab
CTN
SUS_Lab
TCS_Lab
OMC_Lab
CRIME_Lab
FEA
ENG_Labs
OptContFac
Mariner
WBEEShop
|
40m Log |
Not logged in |
 |
|
Tue Jan 4 18:26:59 2022, Anchal, Update, BHD, Tested 2" PR2 candidates transmission
|
Wed Jan 5 17:46:04 2022, Anchal, Update, BHD, Tested 2" PR2 candidates transmission
|
Mon Jan 10 18:20:45 2022, Anchal, Update, BHD, Tested 2" PR2 candidates transmission
|
Tue Jan 11 15:21:16 2022, Anchal, Update, BHD, PR2 transmission calculation  
|
Thu Jan 13 17:10:55 2022, Anchal, Update, BHD, PR2 transmission calculation  
|
Fri Jan 14 03:07:04 2022, Koji, Update, BHD, PR2 transmission calculation
|
Fri Jan 14 11:00:29 2022, Anchal, Update, BHD, PR2 transmission calculation
|
Fri Jan 14 13:46:25 2022, Anchal, Update, BHD, PR2 transmission calculation updated  
|
Wed Jan 19 16:22:48 2022, Anchal, Update, BHD, PR2 transmission calculation updated 
|
Thu Jan 20 01:48:02 2022, Koji, Update, BHD, PR2 transmission calculation updated
|
|
Message ID: 16602
Entry time: Thu Jan 20 01:48:02 2022
In reply to: 16598
|
Author: |
Koji |
Type: |
Update |
Category: |
BHD |
Subject: |
PR2 transmission calculation updated |
|
|
IMC is not such lossy. IMC output is supposed to be ~1W.
The critical coupling condition is G_PRC = 1/T_PRM = 17.7. If we really have L_arm = 50ppm, we will be very close to the critical coupling. Maybe we are OK if we have such condition as our testing time would be much longer in PRMI than PRFPMI at the first phase. If the arm loss turned out to be higher, we'll be saved by falling to undercoupling.
When the PRC is close to the critical coupling (like 50ppm case), we roughly have Tprc x 2 and Tarm to be almost equal. So each beam will have 1/3 of the input power i.e. ~300mW. That's probably too much even for the two OMCs (i.e. 4 DCPDs). That's OK. We can reduce the input power by 3~5.
Quote: |
LO Power
LO power when PRFPMI is locked is calculated by assuming 1 W of input power to IMC. IMC is assumed to let pass 10% of the power ( ).
|
|