40m
QIL
Cryo_Lab
CTN
SUS_Lab
TCS_Lab
OMC_Lab
CRIME_Lab
FEA
ENG_Labs
OptContFac
Mariner
WBEEShop
|
40m Log |
Not logged in |
 |
|
Tue Feb 4 02:13:02 2020, gautam, Update, LSC, Locking updates 
|
Wed Feb 5 16:35:12 2020, gautam, Update, LSC, Diagnosis plan
|
Thu Feb 6 01:16:58 2020, gautam, Update, LSC, Diagnosis results 
|
Thu Feb 6 01:25:50 2020, gautam, Update, LSC, Locking updates 
|
Fri Feb 7 02:24:24 2020, gautam, Update, LSC, Some short notes
|
|
Message ID: 15185
Entry time: Tue Feb 4 02:13:02 2020
Reply to this: 15188
15192
|
Author: |
gautam |
Type: |
Update |
Category: |
LSC |
Subject: |
Locking updates |
|
|
Summary:
The CARM-->RF transition remains out of reach. No systematic diagnosis scheme comes to mind.
Details:
- Config is PRFPMI, SRM is misaligned macroscopically.
- PRMI can easily be locked with 3f signals while CARM is offset from resonance. Aided by DAFI, I turned on the PR violin filter in the BS output section to prevent it from ringing up, making the lock much more robust.
- When the CARM offset is reduced
- POP22 level dips and sometimes goes negative - i don't see this in my simple simulations. POP22 is the trigger signal for MICH/PRCL loops, so to prevent the PRMI lockloss, I mix in some POPDC into the trigger matrix element.
- Once the circulating power exceeds ~10, the ALS noise apparently increases.
- The arms "buzz" through resonance, but the power fluctuation is nearly 0-200 in TRX/TRY, corresponding to several CARM linewidths, but all the out-of-loop ALS noise measurements have me believe that we are close to the CARM linewidth in noise. So we should only see ~factor of 2 fluctuation in power.
- The RF error signal for CARM (=REFL 11) doesn't show any features that i can use to aid the transition / diagnose what is going on systematically.
- Koji suggested changing the actuation for CARM from MC2 to the ETMs, and check if the MC OSEMs witness the excess motion at small CARM offsets
- The ALS transition is scripted, so I had to make a modified version that accommodates this changed actuation scheme.
- The usual CARM-->MC2 matrix element is -1.
- The frequency actuation strength of MC2 is ~3x that of the ETMs. Additionally, ETMX has 5x the series resistance of ETMY. So I used the output matrix elements shown in Attachment #1 so as to get the same loop UGF with the same loop gains elsewhere in the chain. Confirmed the actuation strength is the same using the sensing matrix infrastructure and comparing line heights.
- Attachment #2 shows the measured UGF - both CARM and DARM look okay to me.
- With this new ALS output matrix actuation scheme, I was able to make it to PRMI + arms on zero offset a couple of times tonight, but the drifting input alignment makes the PRMI lock not so robust anymore.
TBC. Mercifully at least the shaker stayed still tonight. |
|
|
|
|