40m
QIL
Cryo_Lab
CTN
SUS_Lab
CAML
OMC_Lab
CRIME_Lab
FEA
ENG_Labs
OptContFac
Mariner
WBEEShop
|
40m Log |
Not logged in |
 |
|
Wed Dec 11 15:01:57 2019, Jon, Summary, PSL, PMC cavity ringdown measurement
|
Thu Dec 12 19:20:43 2019, Yehonathan, Update, PSL, PMC cavity ringdown measurement  
|
Fri Dec 13 12:28:43 2019, Yehonathan, Update, PSL, PMC cavity ringdown measurement
|
Tue Dec 17 20:45:30 2019, rana, Update, PSL, PMC cavity ringdown measurement
|
Fri Dec 27 15:01:02 2019, Yehonathan, Update, PSL, PMC cavity ringdown measurement   
|
Tue Dec 31 03:03:02 2019, gautam, Update, PSL, PMC cavity ringdown measurement
|
Mon Dec 16 18:19:42 2019, shruti, Update, PSL, PMC cavity ringdown measurement : beat-note disruption
|
|
Message ID: 15102
Entry time: Tue Dec 17 20:45:30 2019
In reply to: 15097
|
Author: |
rana |
Type: |
Update |
Category: |
PSL |
Subject: |
PMC cavity ringdown measurement |
|
|
idk - I'm recently worried about the 'thermal self locking' issue we discussed. I think you should try to measure the linewidth by scanning (with low input power) and also measure the TF directly by modulating the power via the AOM and taking the ratio of input/output with the PDA55s. I'm curious to see if the ringdown is different for low and high powers
Quote: |
I plan to model the PD+AOM as a lowpass filter with an RC time constant of 12us and undo its filtering action on the PMC trans ringdown measurement to get the actual ringdown time.
Is this acceptable?
|
This is an ole SURF report on thermal self-locking that may be of use (I haven't read it or checked it for errors, but Royal was pretty good analytically, so its worth looking at) |