|
40m
QIL
Cryo_Lab
CTN
SUS_Lab
TCS_Lab
OMC_Lab
CRIME_Lab
FEA
ENG_Labs
OptContFac
Mariner
WBEEShop
|
| 40m Log |
Not logged in |
 |
|
|
 Tue Oct 8 18:35:09 2019, gautam, Update, LSC, Locking prep
|
 Wed Oct 9 18:15:26 2019, gautam, Update, LSC, PRMI 3f locking 
| |
Wed Oct 9 22:02:58 2019, gautam, Update, LSC, REFL55 whitening issue
| |
Thu Oct 10 01:12:56 2019, gautam, Update, LSC, Locking studies
| |
Wed Oct 16 11:42:17 2019, gautam, Update, LSC, Poor separation of PRCL/MICH in 3f signals
| |
Thu Oct 17 11:19:28 2019, gautam, Update, LSC, Locking activity last night
| |
Tue Oct 22 00:52:27 2019, gautam, Update, LSC, Locking updates
| |
Tue Oct 29 01:24:45 2019, gautam, Update, LSC, More locking updates
| |
Tue Oct 29 15:13:19 2019, gautam, Update, LSC, More locking updates
| |
Wed Oct 30 01:27:00 2019, gautam, Update, LSC, More locking updates
| |
Wed Oct 30 11:53:41 2019, gautam, Update, LSC, MICH loop shape tuning
| |
Wed Oct 30 17:08:40 2019, gautam, Update, LSC, POP22 investigation
| |
Mon Nov 4 15:29:47 2019, gautam, Update, LSC, POP signal path
| |
Mon Nov 4 16:06:58 2019, gautam, Update, LSC, POP optical path
| |
Tue Nov 5 11:52:27 2019, gautam, Update, LSC, Locking notes
| |
Wed Nov 6 02:08:48 2019, gautam, Update, LSC, Locking updates
| |
Wed Nov 6 17:05:45 2019, gautam, Update, LSC, CARM calibration
| |
Wed Nov 6 17:45:34 2019, gautam, Update, LSC, ~
| |
Mon Nov 18 21:04:38 2019, gautam, Update, LSC, Locking - some ideas
| |
Wed Nov 20 01:07:18 2019, gautam, Update, LSC, Locking - progress
| |
Wed Nov 20 12:14:17 2019, gautam, Update, LSC, Locking - progress
| |
Wed Nov 20 17:20:24 2019, Yehonathan, Update, LSC, QPD Investigation
| |
Wed Nov 20 17:52:00 2019, gautam, Update, LSC, QPD MEDM screen update
| |
Wed Nov 20 21:29:28 2019, gautam, Update, LSC, PRG ~13
| |
Fri Nov 22 00:54:14 2019, gautam, Update, LSC, locking notes
| |
Mon Nov 25 19:11:22 2019, gautam, Update, LSC, ALS noise re-look
| |
Wed Nov 27 23:24:01 2019, gautam, Update, LSC, No shaking but no inspiration either
| |
Sun Dec 1 13:38:48 2019, rana, Update, LSC, No shaking but no inspiration either
| |
Tue Dec 3 00:03:57 2019, gautam, Update, LSC, Green ALS also shows elevated noise with high arm buildup
| |
Wed Dec 4 19:54:27 2019, gautam, Update, LSC, A look to the past
| |
Thu Dec 5 01:54:39 2019, gautam, Update, LSC, Partial CM board path engaged
| |
Fri Dec 6 00:02:48 2019, gautam, Update, LSC, What is the correct way to set the 3f offsets?
| |
Fri Nov 15 12:08:04 2019, gautam, Update, LSC, POPDC whitening board
| |
Tue Oct 29 17:40:48 2019, gautam, Update, LSC, More locking updates
|
|
|
Message ID: 15038
Entry time: Wed Nov 20 12:14:17 2019
In reply to: 15037
Reply to this: 15039
|
| Author: |
gautam |
| Type: |
Update |
| Category: |
LSC |
| Subject: |
Locking - progress |
|
|
I took a look at the TRX/TRY RIN reported in the single arm POX/POY lock, and compared the performance of the two available PDs at each of the two ends. Attachment #1 shows the results. Some remarks:
- The noise performance of the two QPDs at each end isn't identical - is there some transimpedance gain difference?
- The lower plot shows the angular motion reported by each QPD when the arm cavity is locked. The EX QPD seems much more sensitive than the EY QPD.
- I estimate that in this condition, each photodiode is receiving ~20uW of power, corresponding to a shot noise limited RIN of ~10^-7. None of the photodiodes saturate this bound.
- There are some ND filters placed in front of the QPDs at both ends. Do we really need these ND filters? I estimate that for the highest buildups, we will have ~10kW * 15ppm * 0.5 ~75mW of power incident on the QPD, so ~20mW per segment. Assuming silicon responsivity of 0.2 A/W, a transimpedance of 1kohm would give us 4V of signal. But the schematic shows higher transimpedance. Do we still have the switching capability for this QPD?
| Quote: |
|
Next steps:
- Check the EX QPD / TRX situation.
|
|
|
|