40m
QIL
Cryo_Lab
CTN
SUS_Lab
TCS_Lab
OMC_Lab
CRIME_Lab
FEA
ENG_Labs
OptContFac
Mariner
WBEEShop
|
40m Log |
Not logged in |
 |
|
Thu May 31 23:12:17 2018, gautam, Update, LSC, DRMI locking attempt
|
Fri Jun 1 01:22:50 2018, gautam, Update, LSC, DRMI locking restored
|
Fri Jun 8 01:58:56 2018, gautam, Update, LSC, DRMI locking attempt again
|
Tue Jun 12 03:22:25 2018, gautam, Update, LSC, AUX laser shuttered
|
Wed Jun 13 01:02:40 2018, gautam, Update, LSC, Reliable and repeatable 1f DRMI locking
|
Wed Jun 13 11:17:40 2018, gautam, Update, LSC, PRCL loop shape anomaly
|
Thu Jun 14 00:40:42 2018, gautam, Update, LSC, PRCL loop shape anomaly
|
Thu Jun 14 18:09:24 2018, gautam, Update, LSC, Reliable and repeatable 1f DRMI locking
|
Fri Jun 15 00:53:21 2018, gautam, Update, LSC, Calibrated MICH spectrum
|
|
Message ID: 13953
Entry time: Wed Jun 13 11:17:40 2018
In reply to: 13952
Reply to this: 13959
|
Author: |
gautam |
Type: |
Update |
Category: |
LSC |
Subject: |
PRCL loop shape anomaly |
|
|
Attachment #1 shows the measured PRCL loop shape. The blue line is meant to be the "expected" loop shape. While the measured loop shape tracks the expectation down to ~100 Hz, I cannot explain the shape below it. I am also not sure what to make of the fact that there is high coherence down to 10 Hz fron IN2 to IN1, but no coherence between EXC/IN2. I confirmed that the low-frequency boost filters were ON during the measurement. I don't understand how a pendulum TF + the digital filters we used can account for the shape below 100Hz.
gautam 11pm: After discussing with Koji, I conclude that the low frequency loop shape is consistent with the excitation amplitude being insufficient below 100 Hz. Coherence is good between In1/In2 because they are the same signal effectively - what we need is coherence between In1 and EXC, which isn't plotted. It is still strange that Coherence between In2/EXC is ZERO....
Quote: |
Measured loop TFs - PRCL is a big mystery. Used these to finalize loop gains.
|
|
|
|