40m QIL Cryo_Lab CTN SUS_Lab TCS_Lab OMC_Lab CRIME_Lab FEA ENG_Labs OptContFac Mariner WBEEShop
  40m Log  Not logged in ELOG logo
Entry  Sun Apr 29 22:53:06 2018, gautam, Update, General, DARM actuation estimate darmEst.pdf
    Reply  Tue May 1 19:37:50 2018, gautam, Update, General, DARM actuation estimate darmEst.pdfdarmEst_time.pdf
       Reply  Mon May 7 16:23:06 2018, gautam, Update, General, DARM actuation estimate darmProj.pdf37.pngMCalign_20180507.png
          Reply  Mon May 7 20:01:14 2018, Rorpheus, Update, General, Use anti-dewhitening + show CARMA/DARMA 
             Reply  Thu May 10 14:13:22 2018, gautam, Update, General, More refinement of DARM control signal projection darmProj.pdfdarmOLTF.pdfDWcomparison.pdf
                Reply  Fri May 11 13:58:42 2018, rana, Update, General, More refinement of DARM control signal projection 
                   Reply  Fri May 11 19:02:52 2018, gautam, Update, General, More refinement of DARM control signal projection darmProj.pdfdarmOLTF.pdfDWcomparison.pdfDARMsuppression.pdfControlLoop.pdf
                      Reply  Sat May 12 10:02:03 2018, rana, Update, General, More refinement of DARM control signal projection 
                         Reply  Sun May 20 17:43:01 2018, rana, Update, Electronics, How to choose resistors 
                      Reply  Mon May 14 18:58:32 2018, Kevin, Update, PonderSqueeze, Squeezing with no SRM homodyne_heatmap.pdfdisplacement_noise.pdfnoise_budget.pdf
                         Reply  Tue Oct 2 23:57:16 2018, gautam, Update, PonderSqueeze, Squeezing scenarios PonderSqueeze_NB_LORIN.pdf
                   Reply  Tue May 15 21:56:57 2018, gautam, Update, General, Stack measurement setup decommissioned 
                      Reply  Thu May 17 09:14:38 2018, Steve, Update, General, Stack measurement setup decommissioned Load_Cell_Measurement_Set_Up.jpgETMX_stack_up_down.png
Message ID: 13841     Entry time: Mon May 14 18:58:32 2018     In reply to: 13835     Reply to this: 14225
Author: Kevin 
Type: Update 
Category: PonderSqueeze 
Subject: Squeezing with no SRM 
Quote:

Note that for Signal Recycling, which is what Kevin tells us we need to do, there is a DARM pole at ~150 Hz.

To be quantitative, since we are looking at smaller squeezing levels and considering the possibility of using 5 W input power, it is possible to see a small amount of squeezing below vacuum with no SRM.

Attachment 1 shows the amount of squeezing below vacuum obtainable as a function of homodyne angle with no SRM and 5 W incident on the back of PRM. The optimum homodyne angle at 210 Hz is 89.2 deg which gives -0.38 dBvac of squeezing. Figure 2 is the displacement noise at this optimal homodyne angle and attachment 3 is the same noise budget shown as the ratio of the various noise sources to the unsqueezed vacuum.

The other parameters used for these calculations are:

  • 4.5 kΩ series resistance for the ETM coils; 15 kΩ for the ITM coils
  • 100 ppm transmissivity on the folding mirrors giving a PRC gain of 40
  • PD quantum efficiency of 0.88

So maybe it's worth considering going for less squeezing with no SRM if that makes it technically more feasible.

Attachment 1: homodyne_heatmap.pdf  337 kB  Uploaded Mon May 14 20:04:08 2018  | Hide | Hide all
homodyne_heatmap.pdf
Attachment 2: displacement_noise.pdf  22 kB  Uploaded Mon May 14 20:04:48 2018  | Hide | Hide all
displacement_noise.pdf
Attachment 3: noise_budget.pdf  20 kB  Uploaded Mon May 14 20:11:15 2018  | Hide | Hide all
noise_budget.pdf
ELOG V3.1.3-