40m
QIL
Cryo_Lab
CTN
SUS_Lab
CAML
OMC_Lab
CRIME_Lab
FEA
ENG_Labs
OptContFac
Mariner
WBEEShop
|
40m Log |
Not logged in |
 |
|
Mon Sep 11 23:31:50 2017, johannes, Update, Cameras, post-vent camera capture comparison 13x
|
Tue Sep 26 22:11:08 2017, johannes, Update, Cameras, post-vent camera capture comparison   
|
Mon Oct 2 12:44:45 2017, johannes, Update, Cameras, Basler 120gm calibration 
|
Mon Oct 2 23:16:05 2017, gautam, HowTo, Cameras, CCD calibration
|
Tue Oct 3 01:58:32 2017, johannes, HowTo, Cameras, CCD calibration
|
Thu Oct 12 01:03:49 2017, johannes, HowTo, Cameras, ETMX GigE side view  
|
Thu Oct 12 07:56:33 2017, Steve, HowTo, Cameras, ETMX GigE side view at 50 deg of IR scattering  
|
Wed Oct 18 11:37:58 2017, johannes, HowTo, Cameras, ETMX GigE side view at 50 deg
|
Wed Oct 18 15:26:58 2017, johannes, HowTo, Cameras, Revision: CCD calibration 
|
|
Message ID: 13375
Entry time: Thu Oct 12 01:03:49 2017
In reply to: 13354
Reply to this: 13377
|
Author: |
johannes |
Type: |
HowTo |
Category: |
Cameras |
Subject: |
ETMX GigE side view |
|
|
I calculated a better lens solution for the ETMX side view with the simple python script that's attached. The camera is still not as close to the viewport as we would like, and now the front lens is almost all the up to the end of the tube. With a little more playing around there maybe a better way, especially if we expand the repertoire of focal lengths. Using Steve's wonderful camera fixture I put the beam spot in focus. I turned the camera sideways for better use of the field of view, and now the beam spot actually fills the center area of the beam, to the point where we probably don't want more magnification or else we start losing the tails of the Gaussian.
We'll take a serious of images tomorrow, and will have an estimate of the scatter loss by the end of tomorrow.
|
|
|
|