40m QIL Cryo_Lab CTN SUS_Lab TCS_Lab OMC_Lab CRIME_Lab FEA ENG_Labs OptContFac Mariner WBEEShop
  40m Log  Not logged in ELOG logo
Entry  Mon May 2 17:11:55 2016, rana, Update, COC, RC folding mirrors 
    Reply  Wed May 18 01:10:22 2016, gautam, Update, COC, Finesse modelling arms.pdfPRC.pdfSRC.pdfFinesse_model.zip
       Reply  Tue May 24 22:49:02 2016, gautam, Update, COC, Finesse modelling - mode overlap scans 9x
          Reply  Tue May 24 23:17:37 2016, ericq, Update, COC, Finesse modelling - mode overlap scans 
             Reply  Thu Jun 16 15:57:46 2016, gautam, Update, COC, Contrast as a function of RoC of ETMX contrastDefect.pdffinesseCode.zip
                Reply  Thu Jun 16 18:42:12 2016, rana, Update, COC, Contrast as a function of RoC of ETMX 
                   Reply  Thu Jun 16 23:02:57 2016, gautam, Update, COC, Contrast as a function of RoC of ETMX contrastDefect.pdf
                      Reply  Mon Jun 20 01:38:04 2016, rana, Update, COC, Contrast as a function of RoC of ETMX 
                         Reply  Mon Jun 20 18:07:15 2016, gautam, Update, COC, Contrast as a function of RoC of ETMX contrastDefectComparison.pdf
             Reply  Tue Jun 28 16:06:09 2016, gautam, Update, COC, RC folding mirrors - further checks C1_HOMcurves_Y.pdfC1_HOMcurves_DR.pdf
                Reply  Thu Jun 30 16:21:32 2016, gautam, Update, COC, Sideband HOMs resonating in arms image.jpegC1_HOMcurves_Y.pdfC1_HOMcurves_X.pdf
                Reply  Sat Aug 13 18:25:22 2016, gautam, Update, COC, RC folding mirrors - Numerical review PRX_consolidated.pdfSRX_consolidated.pdfGouy_PRC.pdfGouy_SRC.pdf
                   Reply  Tue Aug 16 11:51:43 2016, gautam, Update, COC, RC folding mirrors - Numerical review PRC_consolidated.pdfSRC_consolidated.pdfGouyPRC.pdfGouySRC.pdf
                      Reply  Tue Aug 16 16:38:00 2016, gautam, Update, COC, RC folding mirrors - Numerical review PRC_consolidated.pdfSRC_consolidated.pdfGouyPRC.pdfGouySRC.pdf
                         Reply  Wed Aug 17 14:37:36 2016, gautam, Update, COC, RC folding mirrors - Numerical review PRG.pdf
                            Reply  Wed Aug 17 16:28:46 2016, Koji, Update, COC, RC folding mirrors - Numerical review 
                            Reply  Mon Nov 21 15:34:24 2016, gautam, Update, COC, RC folding mirrors - updated specs Recycling_Mirrors_Specs_Nov2016.pdf
                               Reply  Thu Feb 23 10:59:53 2017, gautam, Update, COC, RC folding mirrors - coating optimization PR3_R_170222_2006.pdfPR3_123_TOnoise_170222_2203.pdfPR3_123_Layers_170222_2203.pdfPR3AR_R_170222_2258.pdfPR3AR_123_Layers_170222_2258.pdf
                                  Reply  Tue Mar 14 10:56:33 2017, gautam, Update, COC, RC folding mirrors - coating optimization PR3_R_170313_1701.pdfPR3AR_123_Layers_170313_1701.pdfPR3AR_R_170313_1752.pdfPR3AR_123_Layers_170313_1752.pdf
                                     Reply  Mon Apr 10 15:37:11 2017, gautam, Update, COC, RC folding mirrors - v3 of specs uploaded  8x
Message ID: 12936     Entry time: Mon Apr 10 15:37:11 2017     In reply to: 12887
Author: gautam 
Type: Update 
Category: COC 
Subject: RC folding mirrors - v3 of specs uploaded  

Koji and I have been going over these calculations again before we send a list of revised requirements to Ramin. I've uploaded v3 of the specs to the DCC page. Here is a summary of important changes.

  1. Change in RoC specification - I condensed the mode-matching information previously in 8 plots into the following 2 plots. Between tangential and saggital planes, the harmonic mean was taken. Between X and Y cavities, the arithmetic mean was taken. Considering the information in the following plots, we decided to change the spec RoC from 600 +/- 50m to 1000 +/- 150m. The required sensitivity in sag measurement is similar to the previous case, so I think this should be feasible.

    Why this change? From the phase map information at  /users/public_html/40m_phasemap/40m_TTI gather that we have 2 G&H mirrors, one with curvature ~ -700m and the other with curvature ~ -500m. An elog search suggests that the installed PR2 has RoC ~ -700m, so this choice of RoC for PR3 should give us the best chance of achieving optimal modematching between the RCs and arms as per the plots below.

  2. Cavity stability checks - these plots confirm that the cavity remains stable for this choice of RoC on PR3...
      
  3. Coating design - I've been playing around with the code and my understanding of the situation is as follows. to really hit low AR of 10s of ppms, we need many dielectric layer pairs. But by adding more pairs, we essentially become more susceptible to errors in layer thickness etc, so that even though the code may tell us we can achieve R_AR(532nm) < 50ppm, the minima is pretty sharp so even small perturbations can lead to much higher R of the order of a few percent. On the HR side, we need a large number of layer pairs to achieve T_HR(1064nm)=50ppm. Anyways, the MC studies suggest that for the HR coating design, with 19 layer pairs, we can be fairly certain of T_HR(1064nm)<100ppm and R_HR(532nm)>97% for both polarizations, which seems reasonable. In order to make the R_HR(532nm) less susceptible to errors, we need to reduce the number of layer pairs, but then it becomes difficult to achieve the 50ppm T_HR(1064nm) requirement. Now, I tried using very few layer pairs on the AR side - the best result seems to be with 3 layer pairs, for which we get R_AR(532nm)<1% and T_AR(1064nm)>95%, both numbers seem reasonable to me. In the spectral reflectivity, we also see that the minima are much broader than with large number of layer pairs.

    First row below is for the HR side, second row is for the AR side. For the MC studies, I perturbed the layer thicknesses and refractive indices by 1%, and the angle of incidence by 5%.
        
       

If there are no objections, I would like to send this version of the specs to Ramin and get his feedback. Specifically, I have assumed values for the refractive indices of SiOand Ta2O5 from google, Garilynn tells me that we should get these values from Ramin. Then we can run the code again if necessary, but these MC studies already suggest this coating design is robust to small changes in assumed values of the parameters...

Attachment 1: PRC_modematch.pdf  63 kB  | Hide | Hide all | Show all
PRC_modematch.pdf
Attachment 2: SRC_modematch.pdf  65 kB  | Hide | Hide all | Show all
SRC_modematch.pdf
Attachment 3: TMS_PRC.pdf  37 kB  | Show | Hide all | Show all
Attachment 4: TMS_SRC.pdf  37 kB  | Hide | Hide all | Show all
TMS_SRC.pdf
Attachment 5: PR3_HR_spectralRefl.pdf  94 kB  Uploaded Mon Apr 10 16:39:59 2017  | Hide | Hide all | Show all
PR3_HR_spectralRefl.pdf
Attachment 6: PR3_HR_MC_CDF_revised.pdf  154 kB  Uploaded Mon Apr 10 16:40:26 2017  | Hide | Hide all | Show all
PR3_HR_MC_CDF_revised.pdf
Attachment 7: PR3_AR_spectralRefl_new.pdf  82 kB  Uploaded Mon Apr 10 16:40:55 2017  | Hide | Hide all | Show all
PR3_AR_spectralRefl_new.pdf
Attachment 8: PR3_AR_MC_CDF_new.pdf  163 kB  Uploaded Mon Apr 10 16:41:13 2017  | Hide | Hide all | Show all
PR3_AR_MC_CDF_new.pdf
ELOG V3.1.3-