40m QIL Cryo_Lab CTN SUS_Lab TCS_Lab OMC_Lab CRIME_Lab FEA ENG_Labs OptContFac Mariner WBEEShop
  40m Log  Not logged in ELOG logo
Entry  Mon Mar 27 20:41:21 2017, rana, gautam, Update, PSL, PMC DAQ assay for feed-forward integration TEK00000.PNG20170327_194931.jpg20170327_204554.jpg
    Reply  Wed Mar 29 11:41:19 2017, gautam, Update, PSL, PMC DAQ assay for feed-forward integration C1ALS_PSLnamespace.pngPMCcheckout.pdfD980352-A-40m_151119.pdf
       Reply  Thu Mar 30 00:16:09 2017, gautam, Update, PSL, PSL NPRO PZT calibration 
          Reply  Mon Apr 3 17:25:13 2017, gautam, Update, PSL, PSL NPRO PZT calibration PDHerr.pdfNPROcalib.pdf
             Reply  Tue Apr 4 17:27:58 2017, rana, Update, PSL, PSL NPRO PZT calibration 
       Reply  Thu Mar 30 18:11:01 2017, rana, Update, PSL, PMC DAQ assay for feed-forward integration 
          Reply  Mon Apr 3 23:07:09 2017, gautam, Update, PSL, PMC DAQ assay for feed-forward integration 
             Reply  Tue Apr 11 00:38:37 2017, gautam, Update, PSL, PMC demod moved off servo board PMC_Ctrl_spec.pdf
                Reply  Wed Apr 12 00:36:53 2017, gautam, Update, PSL, PMC demod moved off servo board PMC_digitalSpec.pdfPMC_DAQ_spectra.pdf
                   Reply  Tue Apr 18 01:01:03 2017, gautam, Update, PSL, PMC OLTF measured, DAQ channels calibrated PMCspectra_calibrated.pdfPMC_MEDMs.png
                      Reply  Tue Apr 18 16:10:00 2017, gautam, Update, PSL, PMC OLTF measured, DAQ channels calibrated PMC_OLTF_170418.pdf
                         Reply  Tue Apr 18 23:37:15 2017, rana, Update, PSL, PMC OLTF measured, DAQ channels calibrated 
                         Reply  Wed Apr 19 15:13:30 2017, gautam, Update, PSL, PMC/MCL multicoherence PMC_MCL_multicoherence.pdf
Message ID: 12928     Entry time: Tue Apr 4 17:27:58 2017     In reply to: 12925
Author: rana 
Type: Update 
Category: PSL 
Subject: PSL NPRO PZT calibration 

good cal. I wonder if this data also gives us a good measurement of the cavity pole or if the photo-thermal self-locking effect ruins it. You should look at the data for the positive sweeps and negative sweeps and see if they give the same answer for the cavity poles. Also, maybe we can estimate the PMC cavity pole using the sidebands as well as the carrier and see if they give the same answer? 

ELOG V3.1.3-