40m QIL Cryo_Lab CTN SUS_Lab TCS_Lab OMC_Lab CRIME_Lab FEA ENG_Labs OptContFac Mariner WBEEShop
  40m Log  Not logged in ELOG logo
Entry  Mon Jan 16 21:03:47 2017, rana, Summary, IOO, MCL / MCF / Calibration c1ioo_zoom_MCLF.pngMCL.pdf
    Reply  Wed Jan 18 12:34:21 2017, ericq, Summary, IOO, MCL / MCF / Calibration 
       Reply  Wed Jan 25 18:18:08 2017, Koji, Summary, IOO, MCL / MCF / Calibration 
    Reply  Fri Mar 24 12:21:27 2017, gautam, Summary, IOO, MCL / MCF / Calibration 6x
       Reply  Mon Mar 27 12:48:36 2017, rana, Summary, IOO, MCL / MCF / Calibration 
          Reply  Mon Mar 27 22:40:44 2017, Koji, Summary, IOO, MCL / MCF / Calibration 
Message ID: 12912     Entry time: Mon Mar 27 22:40:44 2017     In reply to: 12907
Author: Koji 
Type: Summary 
Category: IOO 
Subject: MCL / MCF / Calibration 

In http://nodus.ligo.caltech.edu:8080/40m/11793 I posted the calibrated PMC free-running displcament with/without IMC locked. Unfortunately, this measurement was done with a part of the IMC electronics not perfect (https://nodus.ligo.caltech.edu:8081/40m/11794). I did the same measurement after the fix, but there is no low freq data http://nodus.ligo.caltech.edu:8080/40m/11795.

Assuming we have the similar error signal leve in the low freq band as The entry 11793, the IMC is considered to be noisier than the PMC between 0.8 and 4Hz. But we should do the same measurement with the current electronics.

The PMC calibration can be found in this entry http://nodus.ligo.caltech.edu:8080/40m/11780

ELOG V3.1.3-