|
40m
QIL
Cryo_Lab
CTN
SUS_Lab
TCS_Lab
OMC_Lab
CRIME_Lab
FEA
ENG_Labs
OptContFac
Mariner
WBEEShop
|
| 40m Log |
Not logged in |
 |
|
|
 Thu Feb 16 13:29:38 2017, gautam, Summary, General, Alternative Calibration Scheme 
|
 Thu Feb 16 21:55:47 2017, rana, Summary, General, Alternative Calibration Scheme
| |
Tue Feb 21 13:51:35 2017, Craig, Summary, General, Alternative Calibration Scheme
| |
Wed Feb 22 10:16:54 2017, rana, Summary, General, Alternative Calibration Scheme
|
|
|
Message ID: 12845
Entry time: Wed Feb 22 10:16:54 2017
In reply to: 12842
|
| Author: |
rana |
| Type: |
Summary |
| Category: |
General |
| Subject: |
Alternative Calibration Scheme |
|
|
OK, but the questions still stands: "Assuming we want a 1% calibration at 50-500 Hz, what is the requirement on the frequency noise PSD curve?"
| Quote: |
|
We get SNR in two ways: the amplitude of applied force and the integration time. So we are limited in two ways: stability of the lock to applied forces and time of locklosses / calibration fluctuations.
|
|