|
40m
QIL
Cryo_Lab
CTN
SUS_Lab
TCS_Lab
OMC_Lab
CRIME_Lab
FEA
ENG_Labs
OptContFac
Mariner
WBEEShop
|
| 40m Log |
Not logged in |
 |
|
|
 Thu Feb 16 13:29:38 2017, gautam, Summary, General, Alternative Calibration Scheme 
|
 Thu Feb 16 21:55:47 2017, rana, Summary, General, Alternative Calibration Scheme
| |
Tue Feb 21 13:51:35 2017, Craig, Summary, General, Alternative Calibration Scheme
| |
Wed Feb 22 10:16:54 2017, rana, Summary, General, Alternative Calibration Scheme
|
|
|
Message ID: 12835
Entry time: Thu Feb 16 21:55:47 2017
In reply to: 12834
Reply to this: 12842
|
| Author: |
rana |
| Type: |
Summary |
| Category: |
General |
| Subject: |
Alternative Calibration Scheme |
|
|
Question for Craig: What does the SNR of our lines have to be? IF we're only trying to calibrate the actuator in the audio band over long time scales, it seems we could get by with more frequency noise. Assuming we want a 1% calibration at 50-500 Hz, what is the requirement on the frequency noise PSD curve? |