40m QIL Cryo_Lab CTN SUS_Lab TCS_Lab OMC_Lab CRIME_Lab FEA ENG_Labs OptContFac Mariner WBEEShop
  40m Log  Not logged in ELOG logo
Entry  Thu Sep 29 20:21:29 2016, Johannes, Update, General, YARM loss measurement 
    Reply  Mon Oct 3 21:24:02 2016, Johannes, Update, General, XARM loss measurement ReflectionLoss.pdf
       Reply  Tue Oct 4 22:18:24 2016, Johannes, Update, General, X/YARM loss measurement anomalousData.png
          Reply  Wed Oct 5 19:10:04 2016, gautam, Update, General, Arm loss measurement review 
             Reply  Mon Nov 14 19:15:57 2016, Johannes, Update, General, Achievable armloss measurement accuracy 
                Reply  Tue Nov 15 20:35:19 2016, Johannes, Update, General, Achievable armloss measurement accuracy 
                   Reply  Thu Nov 17 21:54:11 2016, Johannes, Update, General, Achievable armloss measurement accuracy 
                      Reply  Thu Jan 12 02:45:53 2017, Johannes, Update, General, Next armloss steps ass_illustration.pdf
                         Reply  Fri Jan 13 08:54:32 2017, Johannes, Update, General, DC PD installed ASDCPD_up.jpgASDCPD_down.jpgscrambled_osci.jpg
Message ID: 12618     Entry time: Tue Nov 15 20:35:19 2016     In reply to: 12614     Reply to this: 12624
Author: Johannes 
Type: Update 
Category: General 
Subject: Achievable armloss measurement accuracy 

I had a mistake in my script that reported the wrong error after averaging several datapoints, and because I hadn't looked at the individual numbers I didn't catch it so far. Thanks to Gautam it is no more.

The updated numbers are (with fresh, more trustworthy data):

XARM: 21 +/ 35 ppm
YARM: 69 +/- 45 ppm

This looks much better. I'm planning to take more data with the AS110 PD rather than AS55 when I get the chance, increase the averaging time, and also sigma filter the datapoints. That should get us to a good spot and cut down the uncertainty even further.

ELOG V3.1.3-