40m QIL Cryo_Lab CTN SUS_Lab TCS_Lab OMC_Lab CRIME_Lab FEA ENG_Labs OptContFac Mariner WBEEShop
  40m Log  Not logged in ELOG logo
Entry  Wed Nov 25 16:40:32 2015, yutaro, Update, LSC, round trip loss of Y arm 
    Reply  Wed Nov 25 23:34:52 2015, yutaro, Update, LSC, round trip loss of Y arm 14.png
       Reply  Fri Nov 27 03:38:23 2015, yutaro, Summary, LSC, round trip loss of Y arm image1.png
          Reply  Fri Nov 27 22:20:24 2015, yutaro, Update, LSC, round trip loss of Y arm log.txt.zip17.png
          Reply  Sat Nov 28 11:46:40 2015, yutaro, Update, LSC, possible error source of loss map measurement 
          Reply  Mon Nov 30 10:41:45 2015, yutaro, Update, LSC, Does a baffle in front of ETMY have effect on loss map measurement? 
             Reply  Mon Nov 30 17:17:30 2015, yutaro, Update, LSC, Does a baffle in front of ETMY have effect on loss map measurement? element2-2.pngelement0-0.pngelement4-4.png
          Reply  Mon Dec 7 11:11:25 2015, yutaro, Summary, LSC, round trip loss of X arm image1-2.JPGsymmetry.png
Message ID: 11857     Entry time: Mon Dec 7 11:11:25 2015     In reply to: 11818
Author: yutaro 
Type: Summary 
Category: LSC 
Subject: round trip loss of X arm 

On the day before yesterday and in this morning, I measured loss map of ETMX. I reported the method I used to change the beam spot on ETMX below.

Round trip loss was measured for 5 x 5 points. The result is below.

(unit: ppm)

455.4 +/- 21.1       437.1 +/- 21.8       482.3 +/- 21.8       461.6 +/- 22.5       507.9 +/- 20.1      
448.4 +/- 20.7       457.3 +/- 21.2       495.6 +/- 20.2       483.1 +/- 20.8       472.2 +/- 19.8      
436.9 +/- 19.3       444.6 +/- 19.7       483.0 +/- 19.5       474.9 +/- 20.9       498.3 +/- 18.7      
454.4 +/- 18.7       474.4 +/- 20.6       487.7 +/- 21.4       482.6 +/- 20.7       487.0 +/- 19.9      
443.7 +/- 18.6       469.9 +/- 20.2       482.8 +/- 18.7       480.9 +/- 19.5       486.1 +/- 19.2 

The correspondence between the loss shown above and the beam spot on ETMX is shown in the attached figure. In the figure, "up" and "right" indicate direction of shift of the beam spot when you watch it via the camera (ex. 455.4 ppm corresponds to the highest and rightest point in the view via the camera). 

This result is consistent withe previous result of 561.19 +/- 14.57 ppm ericq got with ASDC and reported in elog 10248 if the discussion I reported in 11819 is taken into account. Elog 11819 says in short that the strange behavior of ASDC could give us 60-70 ppm error.

The reason why the error is larger than that of the measurement for ETMY is that the noise of POX is larger than that of POY. But I am not sure to what extent the statistical error needs to be reduced.

How I shifted the beam spot on ETMX:   

Basically, the method was same as one used for Y arm. Different point is: for Y arm we have two steering mirrors TT1&2, but for X arm we have only one steering mirror BS. Then in order to shift incident beam so that the beam spot on ITMX does not change, I ran the dithering of X arm as well as that of Y arm and added offsets to both dither loops that caused same amount of shift on ETMX and ETMX. Thanks to the symmetry between X arm and Y arm, the dithering of Y arm ensured that the beam spot on ITMX was unchanged as well as that of ITMY. The idea of this method is schematically shown in Attachment 2. 

The calibration of how much the beam spot shifted is based on the results of elog 11846 . The offset was [-15,-7.5,0,7.5,15]x[-5,-2.5,0,2.5,5] for pitch and yaw, respectively.  

 

Attachment 1: image1-2.JPG  75 kB  | Hide | Hide all
image1-2.JPG
Attachment 2: symmetry.png  78 kB  Uploaded Mon Dec 7 14:24:57 2015  | Hide | Hide all
symmetry.png
ELOG V3.1.3-