40m QIL Cryo_Lab CTN SUS_Lab TCS_Lab OMC_Lab CRIME_Lab FEA ENG_Labs OptContFac Mariner WBEEShop
  40m Log  Not logged in ELOG logo
Entry  Thu Nov 5 02:18:32 2015, gautam, Update, LSC, FSR and linewidth measurements with phase tracker 
    Reply  Fri Nov 6 15:56:00 2015, gautam, Update, LSC, FSR and linewidth measurements with phase tracker Xcalib.pdfYcalib.pdfY_scan_log.pdf2015-11-05_phase_tracker_calib.dat.zip2015-11-04_y_arm_scan.dat.zip
       Reply  Mon Nov 9 11:34:51 2015, yutaro, Update, LSC, FSR and linewidth measurements with phase tracker plt.pngfitresult_and_code.zip
          Reply  Mon Nov 9 14:24:36 2015, yutaro, Update, LSC, FSR and linewidth measurements with phase tracker 
             Reply  Mon Nov 9 15:59:06 2015, ericq, Update, LSC, FSR and linewidth measurements with phase tracker 
                Reply  Mon Nov 9 16:58:59 2015, gautam, Update, LSC, FSR and linewidth measurements with phase tracker Y_scan.pdfmodDepth.pdfMatlab_code.zip
                   Reply  Tue Nov 10 02:34:28 2015, gautam, Update, LSC, Updated interpretation of peaks Y_scan.pdfmodDepth.pdf
                      Reply  Tue Nov 10 11:06:02 2015, yutaro, Update, LSC, Updated interpretation of peaks HOMlocation.pnghomfit.png
                         Reply  Tue Nov 10 11:40:03 2015, Koji, Update, LSC, Updated interpretation of peaks 
                            Reply  Tue Nov 10 16:34:00 2015, yutaro, Update, LSC, Updated interpretation of peaks homfit2.png
                               Reply  Fri Nov 13 17:33:39 2015, gautam, Update, LSC, g-factor measurements findGFactor.zip
                      Reply  Tue Nov 10 11:41:56 2015, Koji, Update, LSC, Updated interpretation of peaks 
       Reply  Fri Nov 13 15:48:16 2015, gautam, Update, LSC, Phase tracker calibration using Rubidium standard 6x
Message ID: 11749     Entry time: Tue Nov 10 16:34:00 2015     In reply to: 11747     Reply to this: 11762
Author: yutaro 
Type: Update 
Category: LSC 
Subject: Updated interpretation of peaks 
Quote:

What is the uncertainty of your RoC estimation?

The uncertainty came from the residual of linear fitting and based on my estimation,

ROC_ETMY = 59.3 +/- 0.1 m.

 

And I attach the updated figure of the fitting (with residual zoomed up).

Data points in the lower are (intentionally) slightly shifted horizontally to make it easy for us to see them.

It is hard, I think, to estimate the error of each data point, but I used 17 kHz for the errors of all data points; 17 kHz is the error of FSR estimation of this measurement, and since FSR is the distance between two carrier peaks we can consider that HOM distances, which are the distance between carrier peaks and HOM peaks, have similar order errors comared with that of FSR. 

Attachment 1: homfit2.png  43 kB  | Hide | Hide all
homfit2.png
ELOG V3.1.3-