|
40m
QIL
Cryo_Lab
CTN
SUS_Lab
TCS_Lab
OMC_Lab
CRIME_Lab
FEA
ENG_Labs
OptContFac
Mariner
WBEEShop
|
| 40m Log |
Not logged in |
 |
|
|
 Thu Nov 5 02:18:32 2015, gautam, Update, LSC, FSR and linewidth measurements with phase tracker
|
 Fri Nov 6 15:56:00 2015, gautam, Update, LSC, FSR and linewidth measurements with phase tracker 
| |
Mon Nov 9 11:34:51 2015, yutaro, Update, LSC, FSR and linewidth measurements with phase tracker
| |
Mon Nov 9 14:24:36 2015, yutaro, Update, LSC, FSR and linewidth measurements with phase tracker
| |
Mon Nov 9 15:59:06 2015, ericq, Update, LSC, FSR and linewidth measurements with phase tracker
| |
Mon Nov 9 16:58:59 2015, gautam, Update, LSC, FSR and linewidth measurements with phase tracker
| |
Tue Nov 10 02:34:28 2015, gautam, Update, LSC, Updated interpretation of peaks
| |
Tue Nov 10 11:06:02 2015, yutaro, Update, LSC, Updated interpretation of peaks
| |
Tue Nov 10 11:40:03 2015, Koji, Update, LSC, Updated interpretation of peaks
| |
Tue Nov 10 16:34:00 2015, yutaro, Update, LSC, Updated interpretation of peaks
| |
Fri Nov 13 17:33:39 2015, gautam, Update, LSC, g-factor measurements
| |
Tue Nov 10 11:41:56 2015, Koji, Update, LSC, Updated interpretation of peaks
| |
Fri Nov 13 15:48:16 2015, gautam, Update, LSC, Phase tracker calibration using Rubidium standard 6x
|
|
|
Message ID: 11747
Entry time: Tue Nov 10 11:40:03 2015
In reply to: 11746
Reply to this: 11749
|
| Author: |
Koji |
| Type: |
Update |
| Category: |
LSC |
| Subject: |
Updated interpretation of peaks |
|
|
What is the uncertainty of your RoC estimation?
One measurement of the ETMY ROC was 57.6m, but we trust another measured value of 60.26m than the other.
The value is always dependent on the spotposition on the mirror and how the ROC is calculated from the mirror phase map (e.g. spotsize, averaging method).
So I don't think this is a huge deviation from the spec. |