40m QIL Cryo_Lab CTN SUS_Lab TCS_Lab OMC_Lab CRIME_Lab FEA ENG_Labs OptContFac Mariner WBEEShop
  40m Log  Not logged in ELOG logo
Entry  Thu Nov 5 02:18:32 2015, gautam, Update, LSC, FSR and linewidth measurements with phase tracker 
    Reply  Fri Nov 6 15:56:00 2015, gautam, Update, LSC, FSR and linewidth measurements with phase tracker Xcalib.pdfYcalib.pdfY_scan_log.pdf2015-11-05_phase_tracker_calib.dat.zip2015-11-04_y_arm_scan.dat.zip
       Reply  Mon Nov 9 11:34:51 2015, yutaro, Update, LSC, FSR and linewidth measurements with phase tracker plt.pngfitresult_and_code.zip
          Reply  Mon Nov 9 14:24:36 2015, yutaro, Update, LSC, FSR and linewidth measurements with phase tracker 
             Reply  Mon Nov 9 15:59:06 2015, ericq, Update, LSC, FSR and linewidth measurements with phase tracker 
                Reply  Mon Nov 9 16:58:59 2015, gautam, Update, LSC, FSR and linewidth measurements with phase tracker Y_scan.pdfmodDepth.pdfMatlab_code.zip
                   Reply  Tue Nov 10 02:34:28 2015, gautam, Update, LSC, Updated interpretation of peaks Y_scan.pdfmodDepth.pdf
                      Reply  Tue Nov 10 11:06:02 2015, yutaro, Update, LSC, Updated interpretation of peaks HOMlocation.pnghomfit.png
                         Reply  Tue Nov 10 11:40:03 2015, Koji, Update, LSC, Updated interpretation of peaks 
                            Reply  Tue Nov 10 16:34:00 2015, yutaro, Update, LSC, Updated interpretation of peaks homfit2.png
                               Reply  Fri Nov 13 17:33:39 2015, gautam, Update, LSC, g-factor measurements findGFactor.zip
                      Reply  Tue Nov 10 11:41:56 2015, Koji, Update, LSC, Updated interpretation of peaks 
       Reply  Fri Nov 13 15:48:16 2015, gautam, Update, LSC, Phase tracker calibration using Rubidium standard 6x
Message ID: 11745     Entry time: Tue Nov 10 02:34:28 2015     In reply to: 11743     Reply to this: 11746   11748
Author: gautam 
Type: Update 
Category: LSC 
Subject: Updated interpretation of peaks 

After thinking about the interpretation of the various peaks seen in the scan through 2 FSRs, I have revised the information presented in the previous elog. Yutaro pointed out that the modulation frequency isn't exactly 11MHz, but according to this elog, is 11.066209 MHz. So instead of using mod(11e6,FSR), I really should have been using mod(11.066209,FSR) and mod(5*11.066209,FSR) to locate the positions of the 11MHz and 55MHz sidebands relative to the carrier resonances. With this correction, the 'unknown' peaks identified in Attachment #1 in elog 11743 are in fact the 55MHz sideband resonances. 

However, this means that the peaks which were previously identified as 55MHz sideband resonances have to be interpreted now - I'm having trouble identifying these. If we assume that the types of peaks present in the scan are 11 MHz sideband, 55MHz sideband, and the TEM00, TEM10, TEM20, TEM30, and TEM40 mode resonances, then the peaks marked in grey in Attachment #1 to this elog can be interpreted as TEM30 (right of a carrier resonance) and TEM40 (left of a carrier resonance) mode resonances - however, the fitted center frequencies differ from the expected center frequencies (determined using the same method as elog 469) by ~3% (for TEM30) and ~20% (for TEM40) - therefore I am skeptical about these peaks, particularly the 4th HOM resonances. In any case, they are the smallest of all the peaks, and any correction due to them will be small. 

The updated modulation depths are as follows (computed using the same method as described in elog 11743, the updated plot showing the ratio of bessel functions as a function of the modulation depth is Attachment #2 in this elog):

@11.066209 MHz ---- 0.179

@5*11.066209 MHz --- 0.226

These numbers are now reasonably consistent with those reported in elog10211.

As for the mode-matching efficiency, the overall number is almost unchanged if I assume the TEM30 peaks are accurately interpreted: 92.11%. But the dominant HOM contribution comes from the first HOM resonance: (TEM00 = 1, TEM20 = 0.0325, TEM10 = 0.0475, TEM30 =  0.0056). These numbers may change slightly if the 4th HOM resonances are also correctly identified.

ETMx is still not well behaved and the mode cleaner isnt too happy either, so I think we will save the measurement of the round trip arm loss for daytime tomorrow.  

Attachment 1: Y_scan.pdf  188 kB  | Hide | Hide all
Y_scan.pdf
Attachment 2: modDepth.pdf  40 kB  | Hide | Hide all
modDepth.pdf
ELOG V3.1.3-