40m
QIL
Cryo_Lab
CTN
SUS_Lab
TCS_Lab
OMC_Lab
CRIME_Lab
FEA
ENG_Labs
OptContFac
Mariner
WBEEShop
|
40m Log |
Not logged in |
 |
|
Wed Oct 15 20:10:29 2014, ericq, Update, LSC, Interim DARM Signal 7x
|
Thu Oct 16 16:21:42 2014, ericq, Update, LSC, Interim DARM Signal   
|
Thu Oct 16 21:20:59 2014, rana, Update, LSC, misleading modelling
|
Fri Oct 17 03:05:00 2014, ericq, Update, LSC, DARM locked on DC Transmission difference 
|
Fri Oct 17 13:19:48 2014, Jenne, Update, LSC, POP22 ?!?!
|
Tue Oct 21 00:38:40 2014, ericq, Update, LSC, sweep + RMS as uncertainty
|
Wed Oct 22 06:32:29 2014, rana, Update, LSC, sweep + RMS as uncertainty
|
|
Message ID: 10631
Entry time: Wed Oct 22 06:32:29 2014
In reply to: 10627
|
Author: |
rana |
Type: |
Update |
Category: |
LSC |
Subject: |
sweep + RMS as uncertainty |
|
|
This is looking very useful. It will be useful if you can upload some python code somewhere so that I can muck with it.
I would guess that the right way to determine the trans RMS is just to use the single arm lock RIN and then apply that as RIN (not pure TR RMS) to the TR signals before doing the sqrt operation. |