40m QIL Cryo_Lab CTN SUS_Lab TCS_Lab OMC_Lab CRIME_Lab FEA ENG_Labs OptContFac Mariner WBEEShop
  40m Log  Not logged in ELOG logo
Entry  Wed Oct 15 20:10:29 2014, ericq, Update, LSC, Interim DARM Signal 7x
    Reply  Thu Oct 16 16:21:42 2014, ericq, Update, LSC, Interim DARM Signal dcDARMSweep-300.pdfdcDARMSweep-120.pdfdcDARMSweep-50.pdfdcDARMSweep-0.pdf
       Reply  Thu Oct 16 21:20:59 2014, rana, Update, LSC, misleading modelling 
          Reply  Fri Oct 17 03:05:00 2014, ericq, Update, LSC, DARM locked on DC Transmission difference TRdifflock.pngOct17lock.pdf
             Reply  Fri Oct 17 13:19:48 2014, Jenne, Update, LSC, POP22 ?!?! 
          Reply  Tue Oct 21 00:38:40 2014, ericq, Update, LSC, sweep + RMS as uncertainty dcCARMSweep_uncertainties.png
             Reply  Wed Oct 22 06:32:29 2014, rana, Update, LSC, sweep + RMS as uncertainty 
Message ID: 10619     Entry time: Thu Oct 16 21:20:59 2014     In reply to: 10618     Reply to this: 10621   10627
Author: rana 
Type: Update 
Category: LSC 
Subject: misleading modelling 

 I think these are all very helpful and interesting plots. We should see some better performance using either of the DC DARM signals.

BUT, what we really need (instead of just the DC sweeps) is the DC sweep with the uncertainty/noise displayed as a shaded area on the plot, as Nic did for us in the pre-CESAR modelling.

Otherwise, the DC sweeps mistakenly indicate that many channels are good, whereas they really have an RMS noise larger than 100 pm due to low power levels or normalization by a noisy signal.

ELOG V3.1.3-