|
40m
QIL
Cryo_Lab
CTN
SUS_Lab
TCS_Lab
OMC_Lab
CRIME_Lab
FEA
ENG_Labs
OptContFac
Mariner
WBEEShop
|
| 40m Log |
Not logged in |
 |
|
|
 Wed Oct 15 20:10:29 2014, ericq, Update, LSC, Interim DARM Signal 7x
|
 Thu Oct 16 16:21:42 2014, ericq, Update, LSC, Interim DARM Signal
| |
Thu Oct 16 21:20:59 2014, rana, Update, LSC, misleading modelling
| |
Fri Oct 17 03:05:00 2014, ericq, Update, LSC, DARM locked on DC Transmission difference
| |
Fri Oct 17 13:19:48 2014, Jenne, Update, LSC, POP22 ?!?!
| |
Tue Oct 21 00:38:40 2014, ericq, Update, LSC, sweep + RMS as uncertainty
| |
Wed Oct 22 06:32:29 2014, rana, Update, LSC, sweep + RMS as uncertainty
|
|
|
Message ID: 10618
Entry time: Thu Oct 16 16:21:42 2014
In reply to: 10613
Reply to this: 10619
|
| Author: |
ericq |
| Type: |
Update |
| Category: |
LSC |
| Subject: |
Interim DARM Signal |
|
|
I've added (TRX-TRY)/(TRX+TRY) to the DC DARM sweep plots, and it looks like an even better candidate. The slope is closer to linear, and it has a zero crossing within ~10pm of the true DARM zero across the different CARM offsets, so we might not even need to use an intentional DARM offset.
   
|